Here’s what’s emerging on Labor’s Voice: Labor sees it as essential for making a “treaty” to create a separate sovereign aboriginal state.
The 1-minute video shows that in pushing the failing Voice campaign, Anthony Albanese contradicts the claims he made in parliament before the election.
Law Professor Gabrielle Appleby* explains why an aboriginal body, the Voice, must come before making a Treaty “with aboriginals”.
She says, quote: “The sequencing of Voice, Treaty, Truth has been given significant thought. Voice precedes Treaty because fair, modern treaty negotiations require first the establishment of a representative Indigenous body to negotiate the rules of the game with the state. It can’t be left to the state alone, and the state must have a group of people with whom to negotiate.
In Victoria, this was achieved through a specific representative institution – the First Peoples Assembly.
Truth follows Voice and Treaty, because, as Torres Strait Islander political scientist Sana Nakata explains, Voice ensures Truth will matter more than just “continued performance of our rage and grief for a third century and longer”. Voice establishes the power for Treaty, and Treaty establishes the safekeeping of Truth.”
While, I’m not a lawyer, I can read a dictionary definition saying the word “treaty” means “a formally concluded and ratified agreement between states”.
Anthony Albanese is setting up to make the Voice as a body to “represent” the aboriginal industry and then make a separate sovereign entity.
Is this why he and the Labor machine including Minister Burney have been hiding the Voice details. Passing the Voice would end Australia as we know it and create another separate nation.
To create that separate nation and divide Australia, the terms and conditions would be negotiated between Albanese’s Voice and Albanese’s government. A power grab.
The result would surrender many controls and rights to the UN. As Labor-Liberals have done repeatedly since the UN was formed in 1944.
And especially since the Whitlam Labor government signed the UN Lima Declaration in 1975, that in 1976 the Fraser Liberal government ratified. That UN Declaration destroyed Australian manufacturing and sent it to China.
As Eddie, an aboriginal from the Northern Territory told me: He is opposed to the politicians’ Voice for two reasons:
1. He’s Australian, and
2. The Voice is racist.
At the Voice referendum, I’ll be joining with many aboriginals voting NO.
*Professor Gabrielle Appleby is a Professor at the Faculty of Law and Justice, UNSW Sydney. She researches and teaches in public law. She is the Director of The Judiciary Project at the Gilbert + Tobin Centre of Public Law, the constitutional consultant to the Clerk of the Australian House of Representatives and a member of the Indigenous Law Centre. In 2016-2017, she worked as a pro-bono constitutional adviser to the Regional Dialogues and the First Nations Constitutional Convention that led to the Uluru Statement from the Heart.
Any Australian, who endorsesw the Evil, Global terrorist cabal of the “Privately owned so called UN, is a “FOOL” just have a look at the Fake constitution involved “WHEN” Twice we voted against local government IE Council, UN Criminals, but the votes meant nothing to them, they went & did local government under corporate law they are UNLAWFUL under Our real constitution ! WAKE UP !
I totally agree , When they say they want to recognize the Aboriginals as a nation in our constitution , but back dated to 1788 saying Aboriginals was a nation before us , so they own all the land and we are a bunch of immigrants who invaded their country . Even thou you were born here you can never become a citizen . Albo said this is nation building , He fails to mention it won’t be your nation he is building
Spot on – all this stupid fool will do by making it a separate sovereign aboriginal state, is to effectively drive a wedge between black and white. One party will throw their weight around and the other party will fight back.
The Indigenous are being led like sheep to the slaughter, WAKE UP before its too late.
Never in all the years has their ever been any laws that were beneficial to the Indigenous, it has always contained clauses of something to benefit the white community.
Example – If a particular area is proven to be your land, you can have it back as per the “Voice” agreement, BUT….a clause will be in there somewhere hidden with all the ‘within’, ‘therefores’, ‘aforementioned and ‘wherefores’, that says you can go jump as there are now white peoples’ homes on that land, so we the Government will have the last say in making that decision, you will have no final say at all. The Government will override your decision and it will set in concrete in the laws.
The Indigenous will be screwed again..