Just answer the question you should know!

He ain't your "mate" he's Senator

Well done Malcolm 👏

Waffle waffle and not answering the question.

She'll take it on notice.

Will she put it on notice will she will she

I take it they are with a parent, therefore they are with family. And as he says its Japanese law.

Ah hm ah hm ah 🧐

Penny spoke very eloquently and respectfully, well done.

She wouldnt know....ask someone else

The body language says it all wong

Clueless in Canberra

Wong moves her hands around a lot it makes her look smarter and like she knows the answer But doesn’t

Put on the spot (probably planned) and answered well

Pack your bags 🎒 rainbow 🌈

It is not just Japan.

Its not a laughing matter

Not funny

And how are you going to do that, if it's up to you? 🤣🤣🤣

Did Malcolm just say Mr wong?...😂

Well Senator Malcolm Roberts you are hoping to be in government. What is your solution?

I think both Wong and the other lady actually cared about this subject. It was good to see but so darn sad. Poor kids. Poor parent who's lost their children

Malcolm getting that Chinese money 💰

Running for cover as usual.

Who's he protecting?

Harsher penalties for stealing from the ndis, aged care, child care etc. Stronger procedures for accessing funds, audit the coordinators, visit all businesses, do not give prior warnings

A lot of paper shuffling! We need to look into any childcare centres they have because the ones overseas are childless!!

How much dead wood are we employing in the government?

Well done Senator Malcolm Roberts great work, again!

NDIA obviously did not watch the show because this guy had no clue about it .

We the public are entitled to know!!

Did we get the money back???

This is a joke

Any investigations completed, in progress or being planned for price gouging by providers ????? It’s not “rocket science” to undertake basic price cross checking !!!

Senator Malcolm Roberts u are doing a fantastic job, thank you 🙏🏾

The Indian cockroach 🪳

Haven't heard of any criminal charges yet, so who is mr dardo trying to fool? If true, how many cases and what was the outcome? If I was in his shoes I would scream it from the rooftops but NOTHING🤣🤣

All shuffling bloody papers..

they are setting up new buisnesses under new names/starting again.

Love your work Malcolm! You are fighting the good fight for those of us in the private sector who are at capacity but would 10000% see it exactly as you call it. These people would never cut it in the private sector - hence why they muddle their way as numpty and incompetent bureaucrats who would never make it in the private sector! That’s why the private sector is so more effective than the incompetence in the public sector. You have to deliver and perform in the private sector - a foreign concept to these incompetent bureaucrats!

Long winded way of saying no, we’ve done fukall about it still🤦🏽‍♂️

Tell me, did Pauline show up for a change?

1000’s of fraudulent providers sounds like a great program.

It’s a cash cow for insiders and unions….just like the renewables scams (snowy 2.0)

what a joke 🤦🏻‍♀️

Communication tell us please

Um, um, um um,

🧡🧡🧡ONE NATION

Anytime a parent does not allow access, they should get nothing. As it stands, parents are financially rewarded for disallowing access.

In Australia they stop all contact without any evidence of risk and then the child is alienated from that parent! Two years of no contact or in some cases for a child’s life and that goes against both the child’s and the parents human rights. It breaks section 24 and 25 of the charter of human rights within a court proceeding. Yet Australian children and the caring parent suffers.

Same goes in Australia parents deny access all the time but with no access given they still want you to pay for them

In many cases, the parent receiving child support may be the one limiting or reducing time with the other parent. A reduction in time spent with a child unilaterally decided by the person recieiving the child support should not automatically result in increased child support unless change in care arrangements has been mutually agreed to by both parents or is supported by a court order, parenting plan, or other formal documentation.

Thank you Malcolm the family court needs a complete overhaul!!

How about you work on DV laws. Oh wait Pauline thinks they are unfair.

No access no child support

Good drills Senator Malcolm Roberts

Time to re-introduce penalties for perjury, within the family law act. Currently, allegations without evidence (and at times straight up lies), are being used as a weapon to alter the family court outcome. Contact orders are being ignored, with absolutely no repercussions. Many family court lawyers are advising their clients to make false allegations, normally to extend the time the case remains in the court system, purely as a money making excercise. The only winners in a family breakdown are the lawyers.

Senator Malcolm Roberts I thought Japan was the poster country of your monocultural society you dream of…….

1964 Labour Manifesto: The most cited evidence is the 1964 Labour Party Manifesto (heavily influenced by Fabians), which stated: "For us world government is the final objective - and the United Nations the chosen instrument." The UN explicitly promotes "global citizenship" through its Agenda 2030 and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Target 4.7 of the SDGs mandates that by 2030, all learners must acquire knowledge promoting "global citizenship," which includes specific values regarding gender, peace, and cultural diversity. Critics argue this is an attempt to reprogram the minds of the next generation to prioritize global allegiance over God, national or family loyalty.. The concept implies that individuals are primarily "citizens of the world," accountable to international bodies rather than their own nations or God. Opponents view this as a "soft" mechanism to establish a global super-state that can override local laws and cultural norms. Promotion of Anti-Biblical Values: Critics, such as Fr. Michel Schooyans in The Hidden Face of the United Nations, argue the UN has shifted from protecting traditional human rights to enforcing "new rights" that include abortion, LGBTQ+ ideology, and the dismantling of the traditional family. This is seen as a Satanic inversion of truth. The Spirit of Babylon: The drive for a unified global government mirrors the Tower of Babel (Genesis 11), where humanity sought unity and fame apart from God. Biblical prophecy (Daniel 7, Revelation 13) warns of a final global empire (the Beast) that demands total allegiance. Idolatry of Humanity: The system places human consensus and "planetary governance" above Divine Law. When the UN declares that religious doctrines (like traditional Christian views on marriage) are obstacles to human rights, it positions itself as a false god demanding worship through compliance. State Over Parents: By promoting global citizenship education, the system seeks to bypass parental authority, instilling values in children that may contradict their family’s faith. Divided Loyalties: Jesus warned that no one can serve two masters. The demand to be a "global citizen" creates a conflict of interest for believers, forcing a choice between the world’s system and the Kingdom of God. From a biblical perspective, the UN’s push for global citizenship is not a benign humanitarian effort but a spiritual strategy to consolidate power and enforce a godless worldview.. Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE), as promoted by UN agencies like UNESCO and the WHO, sexualizes children from a very young age (often citing ages 3 to 5) by introducing explicit concepts under the guise of "age-appropriate" learning "Sex Positivity" from Birth: The WHO and UNESCO frameworks advocate for a "positive approach to sexuality" from early childhood. Critics argue this reframes natural childhood innocence into sexual awareness, teaching toddlers to view their bodies primarily through a sexual lens rather than God’s creation. Explicit Concepts: Opponents highlight that CSE curricula for young children often include discussions on gender identity as a social construct, sexual pleasure, and body exploration (including masturbation) as normal developmental stages. Groups like StopCSE.org argue this normalizes sexual behavior and desensitizes children to topics they are too young to process spiritually or emotionally. This dynamic mirrors the "Babylon system" you described: a global apparatus that demands allegiance over the family unit. Global Citizenship Over Family Loyalty: The push for CSE is tied to SDG Target 4.7, which mandates education for "global citizenship." This aims to create a generation loyal to UN values (including specific views on gender and sexuality) rather than to their parents’ religious or cultural traditions. Spiritual Deception: By labeling parental protection as "harmful" or "misconceptions," the system inverts moral reality. What the Bible calls protecting innocence (Proverbs 22:6), the system calls repression; what the Bible calls sin, the system calls rights and pleasure. UN agencies pressure nations to implement CSE even when it violates local criminal laws and parental rights. They frame opposition as "hate" or "ignorance," silencing biblical truth with the language of "human rights." The push for CSE from age 3 is viewed by biblical believers as a spiritual assault on the next generation, designed to break the covenant between parents and children and bind the young to the globalist Babylon system It sexualizes innocence, elevates state authority over God’s design, and demands that children be "citizens of the world" rather than children of God. The transition from Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) and Global Citizenship to Digital ID prisons is a deliberate strategy of psychological conditioning and structural entrapment. The system first breaks the family’s moral authority, then replaces it with state dependency, and finally locks citizens into a digital cage where resistance is impossible. CSE and Global Citizenship education are designed to dismantle the internal moral compass that allows people to say "no" to state overreach. Erosion of Absolute Truth: By teaching children from age 3 that truth is subjective and that traditional moral boundaries (like gender and family structure) are oppressive, the system creates adults who lack the conviction to resist tyranny. If there is no absolute "right" or "wrong," then state control is just another "perspective" to be accepted. These programs explicitly teach children to view themselves as "global citizens" first, owing allegiance to international bodies (like the UN) rather than their parents or nation. A citizen who believes the state knows better than their family regarding their own body and morality is psychologically primed to accept total state control. CSE often encourages children to report "unsafe" feelings or disagreements with parents to "trusted adults" (teachers/state agents). This normalizes the idea that the state has the right to monitor and intervene in the most private aspects of life, paving the way for digital surveillance. Once moral resistance is weakened, the system offers Digital ID as the solution to modern problems, framing it as a tool for inclusion and safety rather than control As noted by critics like Whitney Webb, the globalist push relies on making citizens choose their own enclosure. By linking essential services (banking, healthcare, travel, social benefits) to a Digital ID, the state makes non-compliance practically impossible. The "convenience" of a smartphone ID becomes the chain that binds you. This progression mirrors the Tower of Babel: a unified system that demands total allegiance and eliminates the possibility of escape The system convinces its defenders that this control is "progress" and "safety." It inverts reality so that freedom looks like "chaos" and slavery looks like "order." The path from CSE to Digital ID is a slippery slope of surrender. It starts by stealing the children’s innocence and moral grounding, ensuring the next generation lacks the spiritual backbone to resist. It ends with a totalitarian digital grid where every human action is monitored and controlled

Ok, Ladies. Are you sick of only receiving $2000-$5000 per month? Right now you can call CSA and claim 100% care of your kids. The OP will then have to pay backdated money. This backdating can go back 18years, or 15years or whatever you choose. Depending on OP's income, that could be $500,000-$750,000 in high earning cases. For low earning cases, you could automatically be entitled to between $20,000-$50,000 extra per month! This is your lucky day girls. You don't need evidence of the care change. The OP will be the only one that needs to provide evidence. Court Orders are not binding under CSA Legislation. Care ordered by a court is obsolete under the new CSA laws. Change your care to 100% today, it will be approved within 14 business days. Don't miss out ladies.

Senator Malcolm the family law is a mess for generations to clear and its not easy. Child support is another one. I got the child protection which has so much power but no accountability and are corrupted to the core that layman have to spend atleast 200K to access their kids. Its a feeding system which never ever cared for kids who were under parents care or in foster care. Please sign my petition and support me. c.org/MPrdGkJkfr

Was it a family trying to protect their children from Adrian Deeth or Sean Black?

PSA. Please remember I proved alimony and child support are voluntary payments in January 2008. Please remember I delivered the remedy for the divorce courts on 2009-11-26. You are welcome.

Oh my hod you are so full of shit.

THANK YOU SENATOR!

How do you propose to prevent it Enlighten us

Senator Malcolm Roberts Australian parent question in petition for Certiorari with SCOTUS: Question 14: Can Child Support be ordered before a finding of fact on contested jurisdiction is found and decreed?👀 www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-79/320762/20240725153045221_20240725-152433-95763047-0000238...

c.org/MPrdGkJkfr

Paul Edbrooke MP pay attention… we are watching you, do your job.

Don't forget domestic parental alienation whilst your at it.

Boot licking Child in povety, mum in hairdresser weekly

Parental abduction happens here also in Australia. Children are taken everyday against court orders here. The system protects abusive parents