Wouldn’t have to be paid if they split income, lowered taxes,put everyone on the same rate, make schools tax deductible

I don't support paid parental leave. I absolutely oppose it. But I oppose pretty much everything the government does, so it's in keeping with the distain I have for them. I also oppose all taxation as it is blatant theft.

Paid maternity leave is literally the bare minimum babies and mothers deserve.

Really Malcolm? "They get themselves pregnant and [the government will] have the same problems they did with the baby bonus, with people just doing it for the money,...This is not commonsense ­policy. I’ve gone through a bloody tough life myself as a single ­mother and held down a part-time job. I had no assistance, no help from anyone. But we have such a welfare handout mentality.” Pauline Hanson February 2017

He can go swiming with box jelly fish

I see Barnaby Joyce is recruiting new staff, planning another dip is he ?

Scrap net zero? Another reason not to vote for ON.

They say by contract they get 90 days with spouse per child and the multiple births a year and the divorce and re-marriage to diffent spouse with children plus 30 day leave and sixty days leave, they only work a few months out of the year, is that fair?

Amanda sums up Poorline perfectly

Dam straight and THATS WHAT SHE SAID .

Pauline speaks the truth

We never got it 15 years ago, not sure what the big deal is, If you want to have a baby you need to afford to pay for one

Of course she does, she will always speak the truth and always be for Australians and Australia🩷 One Nation 🧡🧡🧡🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺

You have never voted for it or voted to expand it. That is a fact.

Pauline Hanson for Prime Minister of Australia🇦🇺☮️🧡

But 6 months is excessive.

I would comment but it gets declined for no reason . They pick and choose comments to suit their friends .

Sorry , no one believes this.

The flop has flipped

Kylie Oliver

thanks China, fair swap for our coal and iron ore.

6 AI data centres require vast amounts of electricity and water to power heavy graphics processing units (GPUs) and keep them from overheating. A single large-scale "hyperscale" AI facility (100 MW) uses as much power annually as \(100,000\) homes and consumes millions of gallons of water daily for cooling.The exact amount varies widely depending on location, cooling technology, and model size.Electricity ConsumptionChip Level: An advanced generative AI GPU can draw upwards of \(1,200 \text{ Watts}\) per chip, meaning a single server rack easily draws tens of thousands of watts.Facility Level: Projections indicate AI will drive data centre energy demand to roughly \(945 \text{ Terawatt-hours (TWh)}\) globally by 2030.Local Impact: In Australia, data centres already account for roughly 2% of the total energy on the National Electricity Market.Water ConsumptionDirect Use: AI centres require roughly \(25\text{ ML}\) of water per megawatt of capacity. A typical facility uses around \(300,000\) gallons daily, while massive centres can consume up to 5 million gallons—equivalent to a town of \(50,000\) residents.Indirect Use: Power plants (coal, gas, hydro) also use substantial water to generate the electricity powering these buildings.Cooling Alternatives: Water consumption varies depending on the cooling method. For example, some Google facilities use billions of gallons annually in water-cooled systems, while air-cooled sites use a tiny fraction of that.The footprint of this infrastructure is skyrocketing. You can read more about how this expansion impacts local grids on the Climate Council or explore UN research regarding sustainability on UNRIC.If you're interested in the environmental impact of AI data centres, I can:Provide details on the indirect water and power footprint of running specific modelsDiscuss emerging energy-efficiency optimizations in AI hardwareShare the projected carbon and water footprints expected by 2030 I am worried about this

Well the risk is when the turbines is working and then shedding the asbestos when the brakes are on how much more comon sence do you all bloody need . They have confirmed they have asbestos so we will get the fibres in the air eventually. So we should tell them to take these off the list don't get any and return what we have back .

As much as I feel he was trying to be honest I don't think he really knew the risks and statistics. Just stop the risk altogether. Across the board.

Mate came and play in Wittenoom

Asbestos, is highly dangerous and can be life threatening, but can be considered totally safe, if the government says it is

I was pointing this out two years ago . About asbestos and the other carcinogens in the blades and the fact that they deteriorate and start shedding there poisons with in the first few years of commissioning. And the project agent refuted it and started sprouting on about recycling them. Well here some advice DONT GET INVOLVED IN THE RECYCLING OF THESE THINGS UNLESS YOU HAVE STUDIED THEM PROPERLY ☹️✌️

So now they know (Chinese) only the documentation is checked .....not the product. Onya border force. I have a new word! "Farcecurity"

Regardless of a risk assessment. Asbestos was brought in to the country. So what company is paying the one million plus fine? And when do you expect to receive that money.

What about the people that are breathing it in that don't know. What about the workers going into the wind turbines for maintains with asbestos breaks being put in them. Have ant turbines been found on wind turbines.

Even better get rid of wind turbines ffs

sounds like a documentary just answer the question who let that shit go in them and transport them

A shame Bowen can't be held responsible after all he and his Dept are the ones directly initiating the importing of the turbines and their parts!

Well done.

I call bullshit on testing 😡😡😡🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺

Senator Malcolm Roberts So what is inside the wings? I thought it was asbestos too originally, then the Chinese have changed it to a soft wood component but also now being filled with other stuff. I may have misunderstood the documentary but seem all these wings are being used as landfill, what assurance are we being given that whatever is inside can actually breakdown and what is the breakdown period.

Very careful of what he is letting out

These need to be independently tested

This is interesting given Senator Malcolm Roberts history of hypocrisy. It is only interesting - at this stage. My research has only just begun. “Senator Malcolm Roberts and One Nation have faced criticism for claiming that certain forms of asbestos, such as chrysotile (white asbestos), are "safe" or not harmful if left undisturbed.Australian health and safety authorities, including the Asbestos Safety and Eradication Agency, maintain that all forms of asbestos—including chrysotile—are hazardous. There is no known safe level of exposure.

so the maintenance staff have been breathing this shit in for 10 years now.

Cancel the payments, suspend the base lease, force clean-up restitution, Undeclared Allergens...violation of lease agreement, aggregate verdict.

Lawless Australia 🇦🇺 Rod Culleton - Great Australia Party youtu.be/u587IjTI8hs

Why is Poorline hiding One Nation's finances?

Crickets .... says it all!

There looking into ir . Meaning a whole lot of pen pushing and paper shuffling

Crickets to start with. 🙄

Can anyone understand a thing he has said?

If this weren’t so damn ,serious (it is one of the highest budget line expenditures) it would be laughable. Wasn’t able nor it seemed prepared to provide basics; number of prosecutions in train - didn’t notice in the question a specific case

Panic and fear is i hear

Obviously not by no response

Where is the proof they’ve been investigated?

I do applaud you for shining a light on the impact/convergence between social media and society as it stands.

THE ANSWER IS NO

No answers yet

The answers given, worded the way they are he is doing nothing but talking about hypotheticals and knows very well that they aren't being investigated or even looked at

If they fiddle with the things on their desks and pretend they haven't heard the question, maybe it'll go away? They've been asked the question, because it's in the interest of the public to know. Stop beating about the bush, so the allotted time expires.

What ever you ask, will not be answered. I don’t t even need to look at the video clip. You Know what I’m saying!

What is taking so long

Absolute incompetents

Are they suing those fraudulent providers??

They will take that on notice

Causing trouble and never assimilating. Conquerors masquerading as victims. Using western democracy to destroy western democracy. Infiltrating parliaments to strive to implement Sharia law. Abusing 250,000 British girls in UK and always denying it. The devil comes to kill steal and destroy and that's exactly what this cult is doing to Western countries.

Will take it on notice will be their catch cry same as audits done on all money given to the thousands of so called Aboriginal departments and CEOs

Cases!!!!

Says it all. Pigs in the trough. We allow it.

Senator Malcolm Roberts Did you see the post Pete made regarding the woman with the dreadlocks having since been given Australian Citizenship?

Why is Poorline hiding One Nation's finances?