Hold the line – Undivided Gold Coast Meeting

,

Every day more and more people are joining community rallies against the vaccine mandates that the government is steamrolling ahead with.

Thank you to Frankie Dog Turner Productions on The Grounded TV Network for additional footage of my speech.

Transcript

So we know we’re doing that for the people, you just confirmed that. But we had calls from Josh Frydenberg, the treasurer, saying, please pass my such and such bill.

Sorry mate, but this is really important to you guys too, it is, but there’s something more important than all of it. Freedom.

[crowd] Yes!

I want to compliment some liberal and national party senators Pauline and I will work with anyone, providing them, working in the national interest. Senator Gerard Rennick, Senator Alex Antic from South Australia, Senator Matt Canavan from Queensland. Senator Sam McMahon from Northern Territory, Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells from New South Wales, Craig Kelly from New South Wales, And George Christensen from Queensland.

So we have to be united and hold the line. We are here for freedom. Many people in this room have been coerced into the injection. We did not say anything about those people. They’ve been forced into it. Many are in the room, injected, double injected and not wanting it and regretting it, but that’s the way it’s been. That is despicable. We do not make any judgement that was your circumstances. If you chose it freely, that’s your choice. That’s what we want. Choice. Not coercion. I’m going to disappoint you now, because I’m going to tell the truth about something. You are expecting me possibly to come up with solutions. Don’t expect solutions from politicians. I’m serious! The people who caused this mess in this country are us, the voters. We keep voting for the same donkeys.

[crowd] Yeah!

And those donkeys are not working for us. They have got it so tightly stitched up that a federal senator, even Pauline cannot do much. What we’re doing is working in the political arena through our ban on the government bills, actually voting against it, I’ll get to your questions at the end, at the end of the evening, but we’re also working in the most important court of all, of the court of public opinion. That’s the only court that ultimately matters. I’ve got a barrister here of 40 years of experience. That is the only court that really matters. And we are all in that court. All of us are in that court. There’s no easy solution. The state Premiers have got things tied up with their emergency declarations, emergency directives.

I wrote a letter to that stage, to Palaszczuk and the Prime Minister back in the 19th of October of this year. 67 pages, six pages of letter, seven attachments with details, facts. I normally get staff to do something like that we’ve got some very good staff, but I wanted to make sure I understood it myself, So I did it every bit of it. Now what we’ve seen is that Annastacia Palasczuk state came back last Friday with two pages, not a single question answered. These guys are spreading the same stuff that comes out of the south end of a northbound bull, that’s what they’re doing. Virus characteristics, I asked the chief medical officer for the virus characteristics. The transmission building is high, not as high as South two, but the severity is low to moderate, low to moderate, not severe. That severity is less than some past flu’s. That is a fact, the death data. There is no pandemic of deaths. And you might say, well that’s because there’s lockdowns. No! There is no pandemic of deaths anywhere in the world! Sweden had a sharp rise in deaths, but that was just pulling stuff forward then now reverting to the mean. That’s facts. There is a change in the deaths and that is the Australian data shows deaths go like this, seasonal basis. There’s an upper range and a lower range. Since the injections started, the actual deaths have gone above the upper range, since the injections started. And then the government pulled a little trick. It used to release the death data two weeks after the month closed. 15 weeks and counting. Think about that. I asked the head of a TGA, some basic questions. I said, why have there been 564 deaths from the vaccines? He exploded. He says there haven’t been, there’ve been nine. So I went back to, I went back to my website, back to the internet later that afternoon and came back in the Senate estimates and asked the chief acting head, acting secretary, deputy secretary of the health department that I said, the figures actually show on the TGA’s website, 564 deaths due- this is doctors reporting deaths due to vaccines.

Only the ones that are reported!

They have a process for winding it down to nine. So I said, tell me the process. I want to know if they’ve had autopsies, I want to know if they’ve had blood samples tissue, cultures, et cetera. I want to know how I make 550 odd down to nine. This is one figure we all need to remember. Pfizer this year is forecasting an income of $43.5 billion. And the TGA, when I started asking questions of the TGA and started spreading the news that ivermectin, you’ve heard of that word, haven’t you? I’ve taken it for seven years ago. I’m still here. It didn’t shrink me, something else shrank me. So the TGA wrote me a letter, two and a half, three and a half pages long and they said I must cease advertising ivermectin. They quoted bits out of one of the acts. So how do you handle a bully? Stand up to them. So what I did was I wrote back a very short letter with the help of a barrister that said, I am a duly elected Senator of this parliament. How dare interfere with my communication to and from the citizens of this country. And secondly, I said the government has blood on its hands for refuting ivermectin. And do you know the answer I got? Thank you for your letter. These people, control freaks, are scared of us. They’re trying to control us because they’re afraid. Always beneath control there is fear.

[Crowd] Fear.

When people try to control, think about this leaders get up front, they listen and then paint the vision. And then they draw people with them. You only follow because you want to follow. Following is a choice. Leadership gives people a choice. All the way through this we’ve had the Prime Minister and all the Premiers pushing, kicking from behind and controlling. They are not leaders. They’re frauds. The government is the problem. The government is the problem with this country. Parliaments now, state and federal, serve the parties and their donors. They do not serve the people. That is fundamental. They tried to knock Pauline out, tried to jail her, because she was saying exactly that 25 years ago. But it’s more than that. The media is the problem. Who decides whether or not they buy the media? We do. I’ve cancelled my subscription to sky. I don’t listen to 2GB. I don’t listen to just about anyone, but it goes beyond that. It’s a global assault. This is coordinated from well outside us. It’s not just Western, it’s a global thing. The government is killing this country, to comply with a global order. The core problem is the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, WWF, Greenpeace, the Greens and I mean the Greens. The Greens are really strongly in favour of controlling people. Everything they do has control and they’re doing it on behalf of the UN. They knock back Pauline’s bill again, they knock back Pauline’s bill twice. They knocked it back from even going to committee. So that’s the core problem. But you know, if someone is offering you something like the UN is offering the government control over the people. It’s really the people who make the choice to implement the greed of the UN policies that are at fault and that’s being a Liberal National’s coalition and the Labour Greens coalition. And if you don’t remember the Labour Greens coalition, that’s what Gillard was in with Millon. Labour and Greens are in coalition, and God help us if they get back into power because the Greens will tell Labour what they want them to do. I want to touch on something in the last minute. Who knows about the digital integrity bill? Have a look at our Facebook page, the digital integrity bill, I haven’t got time to go into it, the government will sell your data to a corporation, store it overseas, and then charge you for access to your medical data. There are so many things that is heading towards bringing in a social credit system.

[Woman In The Crowd] Like China!

Like China, exactly. I haven’t got time to go into the details. I just want to leave you with two things. The parliament is the problem. The parliament is not holding government accountable, Pauline and I are trying, a couple of liberal senators are trying, but the parliament is the problem. The second thing is that Pauline and I, we’ll be voting against every government bill until we get freedom back for the people. But then I ask you to do something as well. I ask you to hold the line.

[Crowd] Yes!

I ask you to hold the line and recognise when people cannot- don’t blame them, blame Annastacia Palaszczuk and Scott Morrison. Scott Morrison could end this overnight. So hold the line, be in strong support of other people holding the line and stay united. One united.

/1 Comment/by

Rebuttal to Queensland Premier – COVID evidence

,

This letter is a rebuttal to Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk’s reply to me in late November.

Previous letters in this series (click to read):

Full LetterDownload
/2 Comments/by

Senator Roberts at the Millions March Against Mandatory Vaccines Gold Coast

, ,

Thousands marched on Kurrawa Park Gold Coast to protest the coming vaccine mandates and to stand for freedom. This is my speech to that rally.

Transcript

[Crowd] Hello!

Look at this! It’s wonderful. Look at what we’re doing. Someone over here said, “This is not…” Where’s your poster? Oh, thank you! “This is not scientific, it’s sadistic.” “Hands off our kids!” Look at over here, “End medical apartheid now!” “Forced jabs are crimes against humanity.” “A pedo has more privacy than we do”! This is wrong!

But, my basic message is, the momentum is changing. The momentum is changing. Let me just give you a few examples. Last night, I was at Redlands. They’re expecting in three days notice, they expected to get a couple of hundred people. The hall was packed, standing room only, 500. And I had to yell into the microphone so people outside could hear. And they were there because they want freedom. Freedom.

It wasn’t about being injected or not injected. It was about freedom. Think about some of these things, Daniel Andrews invoked the lockdown in Victoria, when there were around 200 cases a day. When they were 2000 cases a day, he removed the lockdown. Now, here’s why he did it. The CFMEU, rank and file, marks on the union bosses and gave ’em hell because they didn’t stand up for workers. The CFMEU, rank and file, marched in the streets, along with teachers, nurses, doctors, policeman.

They marched in the streets. They were fired upon in our country. But, they kept marching and Andrews realised he was buggered. So, what did he do? Remove the lockdown down. Palaszczuk hasn’t lived that lesson yet.

[Man From Crowd] She will!

She will. She will. The next thing, Up at Livingston Shire Council, which is in Yeppoon. Senator Pauline Hanson, the hardest working, most competent Senator in Australia’s Federal Parliament. She addressed him last Monday, Monday week, she addressed a meeting of 400 people in small business and residents in Yeppoon. They talked to the council the next day and Livingston Shire Council had a unanimous motion that was passed unanimously to tell the government what they could do with their mandate.

They were gonna stand up for their small businesses in Yeppoon and Livingston. Now, that doesn’t mean they’ll get it. But, they have said if the state government intervenes and fires them, who cares? They don’t mind. Then we had Fraser Coast Shire Council. Then we had Banana. And now there’s a fourth one. And the meetings in Redlands. Meeting tomorrow in Beaudesert. There’s a ground swell coming from the people. The people!

Pauline and I have said that we will vote against the government on every bill they put forward until they change this nonsense. And yes, on Thursday, the treasurer, Josh Frydenberg called us and said, “Can you please pass our bill on?” I won’t go into the details. And we said, “No.” Because we’ve got the balance of power at certain times in the Federal Senate, and we are exercising that for the people. Why am I in Parliament? To listen to you and then to speak for you.

That’s my role. Every speech I start in the Senate, there’s more than a couple of minutes long, I start with the words, this been the very first speech and every speech since, “I am a servant to the people of Queensland and Australia.” And I’ll come back to this because when I uttered those words first, the people in the Labour Party laughed. The people on the Liberal Party laughed. Are they laughing now? You’ve got to make that take that grin off their face.

I want to acknowledge Liberal Senators, Gerard Rennick, and Alex Antic… Yes! Give them a hand! They’re abstaining from voting from their own governments bills until they stopped some of these practises. So, thank you, Gerard. Now, I also want to mention, I heard this morning that ATAGI, I can’t remember what they stand for, but they’re regulating a lot of the health practises and the injections. They have broadened the exemption categories for getting exemption from the injections, last night.

They did it quietly, very quietly. But, now if you’ve had… I haven’t got all the details. A colleague of mine in their party sent me the link, I’m gonna look at the link later. But, this is one of them. If you have had an adverse reaction from the first injection, that can be a grounds for exemption from the second one. So, why are they doing this? Why are they doing it? Because of you!

That’s why they’re doing it. Because we’ve got to keep this pressure up. But, that doesn’t mean you should go and have your first one and say you had exemptions. Don’t have any of them in my book. I’m not gonna be injected! Not injected! Now, I want to reach out to those, because we know that 40% of people who have been injected, did so under coercion. Coercion! That is brutal and wrong. And some of these people are worried about what will happen to them.

So, I’m gonna talk to every person who’s been injected. One dose, two dose. We’re with you. We understand that many of you don’t want to be injected and you’ve been forced to. We don’t feel any worse towards you, any better towards you. If an injected brother came up to me and an non injected, you’re the same. You are the same.

But, I have empathy. I have empathy for those who’ve been injected under coercion. Nurses every day make sure people are given informed consent. And then they’re under instructions to be jabbed, to be injected. That is completely wrong. Teachers too. Federal workers too. Just think about this, the basic message from my first opening is stand the line, hold the line, stand up. I will not be injected! Pauline will not be injected. We know some others. Think about what’s happening in this country. How do you lead? What you do when you lead, I’ve done it in business, is you get the data.

You listen to the people, whether it be customers or employees, then you paint a vision. That honest vision. Then you paint. Then you develop the plan and then you pull people towards you. If they want to go, you’re only a leader if you’ve got people who want to follow. Who want to follow. If you are pushing at the back, you are a bully, not a leader. That’s what we’ve got in this country. We don’t have leaders in the Premiers. We don’t have leaders in the Prime Minister. We have lawyers, thugs, intimidators and bullies. I’ll ask you all question. A simple question. Always, beneath control, there is… Fear!

They are terrified of us! That’s why they’re controlling us. And we swallowed some of it. When I was say, “We”, most of the people have swallowed it. But, look at this, you’re waking up. That’s beautiful. I want to talk briefly about the virus characteristics, because I won’t go into the details, but I dug this out of the government. The virus is classified as highly transmissible. It is just like the flu. It’s also classified in severity as being low to moderate. You heard me, low to moderate, not severe, not high severity.

Like many past flus, it is less significant in terms of severity than many past flus. Think about this, in the death data, there is no pandemic of deaths. None at all. There is no pandemic. With a pandemic, you have to have a pandemic of deaths. None. And some people might say, “That’s because lockdowns in Australia.” It’s because there’s no pandemic of deaths. Sweden had an increase in deaths. But, now they’re coming back to the mean.

All it did was pull a few deaths forward, but they’re coming back to the mean. Taiwan has done a spectacular job. If you look at the global figures, there is no pandemic of death. This has been concocted. Now, people do die from COVID. I’m not denying that, but that means they have to be treated with a proper plan. So, let’s consider some of those things. The second thing about death data, is that the deaths in Australia follow a cycle from season to season and they follow a band from season to season.

There is no pandemic of death. But, there is now, above the upper range of deaths, significantly, deaths that are coinciding with the start of injections. That is fact. The second thing about that death data, is the Federal Government used to release it two weeks after the month. We haven’t got it now since the 20th of June. So, what are they doing? Are they hiding the deaths due to injections?

We know they are. They made a couple of changes in their website as a result of my questions, but they’re still hiding the deaths since June. We know that in America they’ve had 16,000 deaths as of the end of July. Europe, 30,000. 46,000 deaths from injections. Now, the third figure on deaths is that the TGA, Therapeutic Goods Administration, has had reported to them… it’s on their website, 546 deaths due to injections, according to doctors.

And when I challenged them and the Senate estimates on that, I thought that the TGA head was gonna have a heart attack. He exploded. And he said, “No! It’s only nine.” Nine, really? How come? And I went back to their website and found it is 546 reported deaths. They have revised the figures down. So, I’ve asked the question, and I’m waiting for the answer. Show me the process by which you reclassify a doctor’s verdict, and you reclassify that as not due to injections.

Did they have blood samples? Did they have an autopsy? Did they have tissue cultures? We want to know. There’s a lot of things we’ve got to dig into because the TGA has not tested these injections in Australia. It has taken the word of the injection manufacturers. That’s not working for us. I also want to talk about Pfizer. There’s one figure you need to know about Pfizer. They’re own income figures project an income this year of $43.5 billion. This is all about money and nothing else.

This is the first time in our country’s history that a government has injected healthy people with something that can kill them and is killing them. It is the first time in our country’s history that a government has withheld proven, safe, affordable, accessible treatment from sick people and let them die. They have banned Ivermectin. I’ve taken it myself. It is one of the top 100 drugs of all time, according to the UN itself. And we’ve banned it in this country for treating COVID.

Doctors are being smashed, practises destroyed, invaded, privacy being smashed. Yeah, it’s murder, it’s genocide. Withholding that is genocide. But, let me tell you something. The TGA sent me a letter a few months ago saying you’ve been talking about Ivermectin in public. Surely not. And they accused me of advertising it. They accused a representative of the people, listening to the people and talking about it publicly. Three and a half page letter, of threats, implied threats.

So, I went back to them and said… they expected me to count down, just say, “Give up.” No. With bullies what do you do? You stand right up to their face. So, what I said back to them was, “How dare you interfere with the work of a representative of the people duly elected, and how dare you, how dare you because the government has blood on its hands.” You know what their answer was? “Thank you for your letter.” The problem here is government.

The second problem is media. I’ve had experiences with the media where they turn the truth into lies. They turn lies into the truth. I’ve cancelled my subscription to Sky News because it has become a propagandist. I no longer listen to 2GB, 4GB whatever it is, in Brisbane because they’ve become propagandists. They get enormous funds through advertising from the government. Same with The Weekend Australian. We don’t buy papers.

My wife buys The Weekend Australian to look for the magazine. That’s it. There’s nothing else of value in that paper. But, remember who decides what media they buy? You do! So, cancel your subscriptions to these globalist media. I also want to make another comment. It’s not just the media. It’s not just tax state and federal and territory governments. It’s a global apparatus underway. We know that. It’s not Western. It’s not white. It’s not European. It’s not to hurt any distinct race, religion, anything like that.

This is about hurting humanity, about controlling humanity. That’s what this is about. What they’re trying to do is separate, injected versus non-injected and then tell me that I’m hurting, I’m a threat to the injected. If your damn injections are so good, why am I a threat to you? Isn’t that the truth? Government is being used to control people. They won’t release to a peoples representative, anything about the contracts they’ve signed with Pfizer, AstraZeneca, because it’s commercial in confidence. I am authorising these expenditures when I stand in the Senate and vote for them.

But, I’m not doing it as my money, I’m doing it as our money, on our behalf. And that’s wrong. We need to know, you need to know. India. I just saw this morning, the Indian Prime Minister has stood up. We know they’re using Ivermectin, they’re using it successfully. They know that the Ivermectin is a prophylactic. It prevents access to the disease of the virus to your body. It also prevents it, it cures people very quickly. Safe for more than 40, 50, 60 years.

No serious adverse side effects, minor adverse effects on a few people. But, this will stop the vaccine…the virus in its tracks. I had a slip up there. It will also stop the vaccine in its tracks. And that’s why it’s banned. That’s why it’s banned, because our TGA is not protecting us. They’re savaging us and killing us because they’re not using Ivermectin in this country for COVID. And a doctor cannot be frank with his patient, because if he is, he or she… the doctor will lose their practise.

What’s happening in this country? In Germany, I met one of the ladies at the Redlands Bay last night, came up to me afterwards and said, she’s a German, of German descent. Her brother in Germany. Un-injected, is now facing a curfew. This virus only hits the un-injected apparently and only at night. Very clever virus.

Yesterday, I came down here and went further south to the border. According to the border residents, there’s a while I saw the , I touched the . I didn’t get infected, but there are 20,000 people, Queenslanders, who can drive home… And right now, if they were allowed to, they’re prevented from coming in by the Premier of this state. Boo. Now the Premier of this state has told them, first of all, there’s no virus at Northern New South Wales. There was a virus case in Tugun just a couple of weeks ago. There is virus in Sydney.

[Man In Crowd] Not now!

No, probably not now. So, what our Premier is telling them to do, she won’t let them drive, fill up their car in Tweed Heads with fuel and drive all the way to Bundaberg. She’s stopping them. She’s saying, “Drive to Sydney, fly to Brisbane, interact with other people on the plane, interact with other people on the ground, and then you can go home.”

So, I’ll tell you the core problem, then I’ll finish. The core problem is the United Nations, the United Nations World Health Organisation, the World Economic Forum, World WWF, Greenpeace. The greens because the greens are pushing injections, mandated injections they completely lost the plot. The Labour Party, The Liberal Party, and The National Party. If you think this is bad, have a look at the 700 page Digital Integrity Bill.

It’s coming, and it’s laying the groundwork for your data to be sold to overseas corporations. And then for you to have to pay, to access to your health data. Other things… I’m serious. It’ll set up a social credit system, which we don’t want. So, the core problem is Parliaments and lack of Parliamentary Accountability.

Why? I’ll tell you why? Because we as voters have just kept voting for the same old donkeys. It’s our fault, and we have the power to change that. If you want to stop this, and I know you do, change the Parliament.

Change the Parliament.

/7 Comments/by

Respect and Senator Thorpe

This week on Marcus Paul I talked about the revelations in Parliament this week and politicians failing to lead by example.

Transcript

Malcolm Roberts, good morning.

Good morning, Marcus. How are you?

Well, thank you, mate. Did you hear that?

I did. It’s disgusting, isn’t it? But you know what it shows, Marcus? It shows complete disrespect for the people of Australia. The people in that parliament house are supposed to be representing the people of Australia and they’re supposed to listen to the people and then serve the people. And what we have is a complete disregard for the people and the people’s assembly house. And what it shows is that voters have lost control of this country. This is supposed to be a democracy in which the citizens are served by the parliament and by the parliamentarians. We now have voters in this country, citizens in this country working for the parliament. The parliaments today, state and federal level, both are serving the parties, the the tired old parties and their donors, that’s it. And so what you have is this nonsense going on in the parliament. I have never yelled out and I never will. Pauline has only yelled out about twice because she just couldn’t contain herself. But she’s never yelled out anything vile or anything crazy. It’s just a matter of, you know, respect for each other. And even if you don’t like someone’s view, they are there to supposedly serve the people of Australia. You have to respect it then listen to them and then beat their argument with data and facts not with slurs and lies.

Yeah, just on one issue that we’re asking our listeners this morning and it’s made news as well. Alcohol should not be tolerated in parliament houses. The senior coalition minister backing a booze ban in the wake of a damning Report on the rates of bullying and harassment in Canberra. We know that Home Affairs minister, Karen Andrews has thrown her support behind an alcohol ban in federal parliament, saying she would be quote very comfortable if it was no longer allowed. This is a workplace. Alcohol should not be tolerated. Well, she’s right. It’s not tolerated here at the radio station. I’m sure it’s not tolerated in any other workplaces where there’s business to be conducted, Malcolm.

Yes, that’s a very good point. I drink very little. The strongest thing I have is a light beer, probably a one or two a week and that’s it. So if they banned alcohol in parliament house, I’ve got no problem with that whatsoever. It is important though, to recognise that it is a workplace and so it is important to recognise that and I agree with you. At the same time, there are so many hours that we spend in parliament house, that it is important to recognise it’s also a social place. And so, it’s not a simple cut and dried issue.

Oh, I understand, yes.

And you know, there are quite often some things, people relax, I relax just depending on the company. So I don’t need booze to make me relax. But some people do. And so there can be some things happening over drinks that will really facilitate politics. And I don’t mean getting drunk. I mean, just, you know, some people relaxing.

Well, a glass of wine over lunch is fine but you know, without going to excess, particularly if you’re expected in the chamber a little later to vote.

Exactly. And see, I wouldn’t drink at all during the day and I never do because even the light beer can affect me slightly. It doesn’t affect my thinking.

You’re lightweight like me, Malcolm. I am a lightweight.

Exactly. Yeah.

Absolute lightweight.

Well, we prefer to call ourselves heavyweights and that we focus on the work rather than the alcohol. But I think, you know, it’s like everything in moderation. The key issue in parliament is that it’s a place where data and facts are no longer used to drive policies and decisions markets and what happens then is that people resort to the other things which has power over others. And we can see that in the rape allegations and in the violent behaviour and the intimidation and the bullying, that starts at the top, you know. And, so it’s up to the prime minister and it’s up to the leader of the opposition to behave properly, respectfully and above all, honestly.

Yeah. I mean, look there was an incident with Anthony Albanese earlier this week that was much publicised. I don’t mind a little bit of banter across the chamber. I mean, I don’t want it to be stayed and you know, where people can’t be emotional if you like. And I understand that there will be interjections, there will be sighs, there will be groans. There will be all this sort of stuff. But I mean, the comments that were made, obviously that’s been reported and you say you heard it in the Senate. I mean, that’s where it goes way too far.

Yeah. I didn’t hear them in the Senate. I just heard what you said.

Oh, okay.

I wasn’t in Senate. We’ve been doing Senate remotely because Palaszczuk up here has got us in quarantine if we come back from Canberra for two weeks and you just can’t be out of the constituents for two weeks. But you know, those comments by Lidia Thorpe were just disgusting and there’s just no room for that at all. And, she does that quite a bit. She has called various people, old men, old grey head men, just slurs and you know, just denigrating people. And that shows that she, shows something about her past but it also shows that she hasn’t got an argument and she’s looking for attention. And I’m guessing that poor old senator Thorpe has not had a good time because she doesn’t feel like people are listening to her or paying any attention. You don’t get attention and respect by behaving in the way she does and she has yet to work that out.

Yep. All right, Malcolm. Just a short old chat this morning, just on what’s been transpiring in parliament this week. You and I will talk again next week. Thank you very much.

All right, mate.

One Nation’s, Malcolm Roberts on the programme.

/by

Greens need division and victims

,

The Greens profit from division and discrimination. You cannot label someone an oppressor without making a victim, so it is not in their interest to actually save victims.

Transcript

I want to refer to speeches that you gave yesterday and also Senator Thorpe. In your speech, you mentioned the term far-right extremist or extremist, every third or fourth line that enshrines separation. Five times in just 18 lines. Senator Thorpe used the term white privilege 11 times on average every fourth line, driving hate and conflict.

Now in private talk with Senator Thorpe, and not meant to be kept private but personal talk, she recognises to me that the Aboriginal Industry is doing enormous damage, but she doesn’t say that in public. What we’ve got is gutless, woke bureaucrats shovelling money continually to keep the gap open so that the people in the Aboriginal Industry, both black and white, can make money off it.

Care requires data and facts, not emotive slogans and labels. Care requires understanding. Senator Thorpe talks about climate and Aboriginals, the UN and Aboriginal, property rights and Aboriginals. They are not the same. These very things are hurting the Aboriginals, but not as much as the resort to labelled. Keeping people locked in victimhood makes them dependent so that The Greens can control them.

I’ve never heard anyone condemn you for your race, your gender, your background, only for your incitement to division and hatred. You have the privilege of being in the Senate and representing Australians. But your rhetoric is dividing on basis of race. Yet every Australian recognises we all have red blood, regardless of our skin colour. We all have a human spirit that we share with every human regardless of ethnicity, regardless of background, regardless of prejudices. And it’s about time that people in this Parliament, especially in The Greens, started to recognise that we should be united, we are one people.

/by

Peter McCullough, Senator Ron Johnson and Australian Politicians Webinar

,

Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, Tess Lawrie, Peter McCullough and Dr Brian Tyson. Attended by four Australian Senators and three current House of Representatives members. Australian Politicians Present include:

  • MP Craig Kelly
  • MP George Christensen
  • MP Neil Angus
  • Senator Malcolm Roberts
  • Senator Gerard Rennick
  • Senator Alex Antic
  • Senator Matt Canavan

Frontline Doctors can save lives and freedoms and paint the way forward to quickly end declared Covid19 pandemics in Australia and around the world.

With Mainstream Media Campaigns often funded by the People’s taxes, have been shown young victims of Covid19 gasping for air in Hospital

The people have been told medications with Decade’s old use and safety records are Poisons or are only good for use on horses.

The people have been obstructed from Medications.  

In Australia, John Skerritt heads the TGA and they have actually classified  Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin as Poisons;  one explanatory note actually explained that it was to funnel people into adopting the Clinical Trial Vaccines (to prevent the perception that there is an alternative to the Vaccines Available).  

The people have had a wedge driven between themselves and Doctors.

This has been achieved in Australia through the TGA obstructing Medications and

through AHPRA, led by Mr Martin Fletcher, via a campaign of warnings and suspensions of

medical professionals who have given their honest and researched risk benefit assessments of the vaccines and who may believe the current clinical trial vaccines are not in the best interests of some, many or almost all Australians.

The people have been tricked into thinking they are all in harm’s way with minimal chance of surviving Covid19.

The People have been tricked into thinking Vaccines will slow or stop people from catching or transmitting Covid19.

The People have been tricked into thinking the Vaccines offer the best way to reduce death and Hospitalisation.

The people have no idea of their own risk profile for Covid19; to get some idea see: www.mycovidodds.org

The Doctors have had their rights to practice their profession compromised in a way where they can no longer express their honest risk benefit assessments of Novel Technology Clinical Trial Phase Vaccines and where they can no longer offer normally what they beleive to be available safe and effective medications for the prevention and early treatment of Covid19.

As Peter McCullough states, the only court (given the legal court systems around the globe are failing at almost every turn to preserve the people’s freedoms and the people’s rights to choose what medications and experimental medications go into their bodies) is the people’s court.

To this end, our Australian Politicians have never had a more important or more responsible role to play than to help these doctors educate the people to the solutions at hand and the dangers to avoid; people kept so long in the dark by the forces losing theri grip on maintaining this darkness.

In this video Robert F. Kennedy’s book ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’ is strongly recommended by Senator Ron Johnson.

Peter McCullough shared 5 key usable, provable and clear principles:

a.      Covid ONLY (⁣practically) spreads from people who are symptomatic.

b.      Thus, NO asymptomatic testing is needed or is of any value.

c.      Natural immunity is much better than the current Novel Technology Clinical Trial Vaccines; You CANNOT ⁣(⁣practically) get Covid again if you have had it.

d.      Covid is quite easily treatable when treated early

e.      ALL current ⁣Novel Technology Clinical Trial Vaccines are NEITHER safe NOR effective.

/2 Comments/by

Reply from Queensland Premier – COVID evidence

,

This letter was in reply to my letter to leaders about the data and evidence on COVID, available here.

Other letters in this series (click to read):

211126-Premier-of-QLD-2

/by

Abundance is something to be celebrated

,

Abundance is not a dirty word, it is a blessing to be celebrated. It is time to return to the Australia we know and love.

Transcript

As a servant to the people of Queensland and Australia, I note that we are living through a time of great civil disturbance. The media have chosen to fill our screens with exaggerated horror and fear. As a result, families are turning against families, neighbours against neighbours, and employers against employees. At this difficult time, we cannot lose sight of the good in this world. While it is daunting for some, we benefit from counting our blessings and looking forward to again becoming the Australia we all know and love. My message tonight is simple: ‘abundance’ is not a dirty word; it’s a blessing to be appreciated.

Australia is blessed with natural diversity in climate and soil. Somewhere on our continent exist the conditions necessary to grow any crop to rival the world’s best. Whether it’s olives in Inglewood or cashews at Dimbulah, Aussie farmers will always step forward to have a go. As 42 countries slip into food deficits, Australia’s agricultural output is at record highs. We’re literally feeding the world right now, and more water for our farmers will feed more of the world’s hungry. Our entrepreneurship lifted Australia from a prison colony to a top-10 world economy. Australians invented the black box flight recorder, heart pacemakers, the electric drill, bionic hearing, wi-fi hotspots and even Google Maps. This flow of innovation has not stopped. It continues. The University of Queensland has pioneered a world-first tissue culture system that can produce up to 500 avocado plants from a single cutting. This gives Australian producers the ability to bring new cultivars to market, faster, cheaper and using fewer chemicals than anywhere else in the world. The world avocado market is valued at $20 billion, and Australia has only $500 million of that so far.

Let’s look at mining. An Australian invention called the Reflux Classifier allows for the recovery of minerals that normally run to waste in the processing of ore. The University of Newcastle pioneered this recent technology, returning $1.5 billion in royalties to Australia every year. The University of Newcastle recently registered a patent on a new type of low-cost thermal storage called miscibility gap alloy. Miscibility gap alloy raises the promise of storing energy from non-baseload power sources, to be fed back into the grid at times of peak energy demand. This has the potential for a multibillion dollar export and licensing industry. I certainly hope so, because that may stop some arguments about the proliferation of unreliable renewables—what I call ‘intermittents’. Miscibility gap alloy could not exist without carbon and without mining. The economic powerhouse that is Australian mining has kept Australia out of recession these last two years. At one point, we had the world’s largest value of stored natural resources. If we were still exploring for the bounty this land has given us, we may still be the richest country in the word. It’s not too late. We need to reject the black-armband view of our history and, by extension, our future. We need to embrace entrepreneurship, to defend the inalienable right of everyday Australians to lift themselves up through hard work and enterprise, and we need to make sure the benefit of that hard work accrues to the Australians doing the work, to everyday Australians, not to foreign corporations. Let me explain.

The wealth each Australian creates every year, called the gross domestic product—per capita and inflation adjusted—increased from $41,000 per person in 1980 to $77,000 per person in 2019. Do we feel almost twice as wealthy as we did 40 years ago, though? No, definitely not. Median or mid-point wages have not increased in this period. The spoils of the hard work of everyday Australians have not gone to everyday Australians. Instead, this wealth has gone to foreign multinational corporations and to the administrative class. Public Service wages are growing at four per cent while private enterprise wages grow at less than one per cent, and that’s just not right. What’s needed in the short term is the removal of all COVID restrictions so the economy can open up and the Australian entrepreneurial spirit can repair the damage of COVID lockdown mismanagement. Then we need to remove green tape so farmers can farm and miners can mine. Instead of unelected, unaccountable foreign bureaucrats dictating to us, we must start making decisions for ourselves. Government does have a role to build the roads, the dams and the railroads. We need to restore our productive capacity to support this growth. Tax and finance reform are necessary to ensure that Australians can access the capital to expand and ensure that the profits from that expansion stay here.

We have one flag. We are one community. We are one people. We are one nation. Abundance is not to be ashamed of. Abundance is a blessing to celebrate.

/by

Unjabbed Lockout

,

This week with Marcus Paul I discussed Remembrance Day, the Queensland Government’s announcement the unvaccinated would be locked out of society and the climate debate.

Transcript

Malcolm Roberts, good morning, mate.

Good morning, Marcus, how are you?

Well, thank you. What does Armistice Day, or Remembrance Day, the 11th of the 11th mean for you?

It means we commemorate the fallen, and also the contribution they made to our country and to protect our freedoms.

Absolutely.

It also brings back an awareness and a responsibility that we have to preserve what they gave us, what they fought for, for us. And also, it reminds me, I can still remember, not long after I was sworn into the Senate, driving from the War Memorial in Canberra, and there’s a long avenue, I think it’s Commonwealth Avenue, I can’t remember.

Yes, I think it is, yeah. It’s beautiful there.

Yeah, and looking at–

It’s gorgeous.

Looking at Parliament House on the Capital and thinking, “Gee, I wonder if one day I’ll have to make a decision about sending people overseas in an armed conflict,” and that’s a weight on my shoulders. But then I was stunned to learn, as I took my position in the Senate, that we don’t have any say, and I’m thinking of, we don’t even have a review of a decision like that. And I’m thinking of Alexander Downer, the Foreign Minister, when he retired from politics. He said on TV, he said that he can still remember John Howard coming back from 9/11 in America, marching into the Cabinet and saying, “We’re off to Iraq.” I mean, you don’t make decisions like that. These are serious decisions, and we shouldn’t enter conflict just chasing someone else, following someone else, rather, into conflict, and not having an end game in mind. I mean, this is so disrespectful to the people who have died in the past and who will die in the future. I mean, it’s just irresponsible.

Yeah. All right. By the way, I’ve got somebody who wants to take you on, Malcolm. We’ll get to that at the end of our conversation. I’ll play some of the audio back. His name is Mark and he’s a regular listener. He’s like me, a bit of a lefty. In fact, I think he’s way more left. But anyway, I’ll get to that in a moment. Now let’s go through a couple of issues here. I want to talk about rapid antigen testing, which you’re in support of, but the Queensland government, or up there in your neck of the woods, if you’re unvaccinated, forget it for 2022, effectively Anastasia Palaszczuk’s announcement just the other day, It mirrors similar to what they’re doing in Victoria, not here in New South Wales. The unvaxxed will be welcome in, I dunno, just under a month. But certainly, in Queensland, you always talk about a two-tiered society. It’s pretty obvious that’s where Anastasia Palaszczuk is headed.

That’s right. It’s all about control, Marcus. But there was a very serious development yesterday in Victoria, and this is where Queensland’s headed too. There was a raid on Dr Mark Hobart’s clinic, he’s a GP in Melbourne. And unidentified people just entered his clinic and wandered around. Can you imagine the arrogance of that? They then took files, patient files, which means that they broke the confidentiality, completely smashed the confidentiality between patient and doctor, which is a fundamental relationship that has been held sacrosanct for 3,000 years. So there’s no confidentiality or privacy of your records with a doctor now. People can just wander in. He then had the temerity, Dr Hobart, to ask for identification, and they reluctantly showed him identification. They did all this with no explanation of who they were, no identification–

Well, who was it?

It was somebody to do with an authorised officer from the Department of Health. Now I don’t know whether that’s State or Federal, because I watched Mark Hobart on, Mark is a wonderful person, very direct. He has got a very, very positive reputation amongst his patients in Melbourne. But they took what they wanted, no reason given. And they just marched out of the joint. And he said, “Hang on a minute.” And they said, “We’ll give you a list later.” So they walked out of the doctor’s surgery with confidential, private patient-doctor files. They took whatever they wanted, and they said, “We’ll give you a list later of what we’ve taken.” How does the doctor know that they’ve recorded things properly? How does he know they won’t deliberately leave things out? They also stole his appointment book. Just took it!

But why would they be targeting this man, this doctor?

I don’t know, but he’s been outspoken with his views on how we need to treat this COVID. So you’d have to ask about that.

So now we’re getting somewhere. So has he been on social media, or in the media, talking about what?

No, he’s been, I don’t think he’s had much work on social media at all, but he’s been known to give his views on a certain medication, Ivermectin, which is one of the World Health Organization’s

Well, that could be it.

hundred essential medicines. The developer was given the Nobel Prize in Medicine. I’ve used it. It’s phenomenal stuff. No side-effects. Mild side-effects on a very small proportion of people. Three point seven billion doses in over 60 years. And you know, this is rubbish.

I know that some doctors have come in for criticism for writing a number of what they call fake exemption certificates. He wasn’t providing exemptions for people, was he?

I don’t know. Maybe that’s got something to do, I don’t know, Marcus. But, you know, the thing is that a doctor-patient relationship… If someone goes to the doctor, you go to the doctor, your records are private and you don’t have people wandering in, no authorization, no identification, and just stealing stuff out of a doctor’s surgery. And then saying, “We’ll tell you what we’ve taken after we’ve had a look at it.”

All right.

This is wrong! This is happening in our country!

Well, I’ll follow up on that. I mean, we don’t, as you know, mate, have absconded and done the wrong thing, and putting the rest of the community at risk by not quarantining. You’re doing the right thing. Anyway, I understand the point. I understand the point. And look, it’s not the police’s fault, they’re acting on, obviously, the authority of the government. I don’t know.

I had another very interesting phone-call from a female as well, which turned into a Zoom conference. It was Parliament’s Respect and Safety Workshop on Safety and Respect in the Workplace, something like that, right. You know, because of what’s happened, and politics in this country, and certain parties, there’ve been abuses of people, even allegations of rape, in Parliament House, this kind of stuff.

Yeah, we know.

So I said, “Yeah, okay, I’ll sign up for training.” And I think all MPs are supposed to do it. And so I started the training. Lovely lady on the other end of the Zoom call. And she was just talking about the introduction of this training, and I said, “Look,” and it just came to me, I didn’t have it planned, it just came to me on the spot. I said, “Look, with due respect to you, you’re giving training,” and we’re about to embark on this training, “You’re giving this training on treating people with respect in the workplace, and the federal government is coercing people to get something in their bodies that they don’t want in there.” Marcus, I heard of a survey from a nurse the other day that said 40% of nurses have been injected reluctantly, under coercion, under threat of losing their job. These people are not happy about that. They’re very upset that this is happening, in this country. And I said to this lady, “Here we are, the federal government giving this training, which I think is good, but at the same time they’re injecting people against their will. That is a violation of the body, it’s just a complete violation.”

But it’s the health orders, Malcolm.

Exactly. This is rubbish, Marcus.

All right.

You can’t do that kind of stuff in this country.

Before we run out of time, you say although you have serious concerns about Australia’s Doherty Institute that’s been advising government on the virus, you note that it has recommended rapid antigen testing instead of quarantine for schoolkids. You say that this test-to-stay-at-school-approach to managing outbreaks is good and that it can improve the quality of life and learning for our children, and you would also like it to be part of our back-to-work protocol across the country.

Yes. I’m still open on the rapid antigen testing. I don’t know whether it’s good or bad. I’m not a medical expert. But it looks like an alternative that’ll enable people to not get an injection if they don’t want it, because there are serious consequences of this injection already appearing right across the world. And so it’s another alternative to give governments a way of saying, “Okay, we understand that this is serious, so we can test people.” Taiwan has had by far the most spectacular success in managing this virus, because it’s actually managed the virus, rather than the virus controlling us, which is what’s happening here. And they do testing at the workplace. And it’s a simple test. We did it in Parliament House last time I was down there. When you walk into your job, you get tested temperature, just hold up one of those infrared, or whatever it is, guns to your forehead. And someone else does it, and they say, “Okay, your temperature’s either cool, or it’s normal, away you go.” If you’re warm over here, you get COVID tested. That’s what’s happening in Taiwan. Taiwan has a similar population to us, 24 million, we’ve got 25. They’re crammed in a tiny island that’s half the size of Tasmania, so they’ve got much higher transmission opportunities for the virus to spread. They got the virus into their country from mainland China. They have a huge interaction with people crossing over those two countries. They got the virus earlier than we did. They get it more heavily, in terms of the risk there. And yet in the first 12 months, when we had over 900 deaths, and we had lockdowns, severe lockdowns, Taiwan had no lockdowns and had seven deaths. Not 700. Seven.

Seven, all right.

And, you know, this is what’s going on in this country. We’re just absurd. It’s complete… I was on a show last night on Facebook, and livestreamed from someone in Canberra managing it. Lovely bloke. Three cops on there. I have never been so impressed with these three people. These three people have all either left or are protesting the police force in their state, Victoria, New South Wales, Queensland. These men were stunning individuals. Strong, well-spoken, quite clear in what they’re doing. And these people are protesting against what’s going on in the police forces. We’re turning into a police state, Marcus.

Before I let you go, have a listen to this. This is one of my regulars, Mark.

I wonder if you worked out that trees make oxygen and that they absorb carbon dioxide and put it back into the soil. Duh!

Are you telling me that you’ll, on this programme, will debate Malcolm Roberts?

Yep. On air.

On air? Beautiful. All right, Malcolm, Mark wants to take you on this time next week.

Oh, sure. Happy.

Happy to?

Yeah, I’d love to. But, Marcus, tell Mark that there is one decider of science. It’s well-known. And this is what the beauty of science is. It’s brought this to the world. It’s developed freedom. The scientific method has developed freedom.

Yep. Quickly.

He needs to be able to tell me where the specific location, the page number, the document title, the authors’ names, where the evidence is, that carbon dioxide from human activity affects climate and needs to be cut.

Well I don’t think it’s just climate change–

He needs to be able to tell me where it’s quantified.

he wants to talk about. There’ll be other issues. But let’s do it. Let’s lock it in next Thursday.

Love to.

I’ve gotta go, mate, ’cause the news is approaching.

See you, mate. We’ll talk to you again next week for the great debate. Malcolm Roberts v Mark, don’t miss it. QSM Traffic.

Southern Cross drive inside the–

/by

Ensuring Election Integrity – Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Integrity of Elections) Bill 2021

,

When I started researching election integrity I was doing it to show that our elections are secure. That is not what I found. There is no requirement to audit the results and no ID requirements to ensure there is no double voting. Our electoral legislation is full of holes. My bill seeks to fix those holes using audits that many well researched committees, agencies and investigations have already suggested. There really isn’t much reason to vote against it.

Transcript

As a servant to the people of Queensland and Australia I present the the Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Integrity of Elections) Bill 2021, which amends the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918.

This bill provides for the routine auditing of the electronic component of Australian federal elections and for the provision of voter identification.

It should also be noted that this bill does not look backward to previous elections, but rather forward to ensure confidence in the next election.

During COVID the actions of unelected bureaucrats and incompetent politicians has wiped out small businesses and jobs, disrupted lives and reduced many people to desperation.

The next election will be a powder keg.

It is essential to ensure that Australians can accept the result and move on.

Suspicion of the outcome can be easily fueled, especially on social media, and turned into violence by those who seek to manipulate the result for their own ends.

The level of trust in the result must be commensurate with the current heightened level of risk.

When I started researching election integrity it was to show that our elections are secure. That is not what I found.

The Australian National Audit Office conducted three audits into the 2013 federal election. Their final report came out in 2016. This is what ANAO said about the Australian Electoral Commission (the AEC):

In 2014 the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters wrote to the Auditor General seeking a performance audit focusing on the adequacy of the Australian Electoral Commission implementation of recommendations arising from earlier ANAO audits of the AEC.

The Auditor General decided to conduct 3 related performance audits.

All three reports found that the AEC had not adequately and effectively implemented the earlier ANAO recommendations. The reports concluded that in order to protect the integrity of the Australian electoral system and rebuild confidence in the AEC these recommendations should be implemented.

AUDITOR-GENERAL REPORT NO. 6 OF 2015–16

The report went on to say:

“ANAO plans to undertake a follow-up audit following the next federal election, in 2016, to examine the adequacy and effectiveness of the AEC’s implementation of the ten recommendations made by ANAO across three reports.”

AUDITOR-GENERAL REPORT NO. 6 OF 2015–16

Those recommendations included:

“the AEC must develop a strategy for deeper reform to ensure and demonstrate integrity in all aspects of the election, including a fundamental overhaul of the AEC’s policies and procedures to restore confidence in the electoral process”.

AUDITOR-GENERAL REPORT NO. 6 OF 2015–16

Let me say that again – a fundamental overhaul to ensure election integrity.

Mr President the follow-up audit to test how well the AEC implemented this fundamental review into election integrity never occurred.

Perhaps someone should do a bill to bring on that audit. Oh wait Mr President, I did.

Were ANAO happy for this direction – apparently not.

In their submission to this bill ANAO said my bill was not necessary as they had the power to audit the AEC at any time.

If that is the case then they should get on with it.

Mr President New South Wales and Western Australia have provisions in their electoral acts to audit state elections.

New South Wales conducts an audit before each election to ensure systems are fit for purpose and then audits again after each election to ensure integrity, and to see what can be improved for next time.

Western Australia audits after every election.

There is no audit function currently specified in the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918.

This bill creates a function for the Auditor General to audit the operation of the AEC twice in each election cycle:

  1. In the lead up to the election; and
  2. From polling day to the declaration of the poll.

 The audit provided for in this bill covers electronic measures, and tests if:

“the use of authorised technology produces the same result as would be obtained without the use of authorised technology.”

Put simply this is asking the Auditor General to ensure that the use of computerised voter rolls, tallying, preference allocations and related matters produced a result that accurately reflects the will of the people.

ANAO felt that was too high a bar to meet, I would consider ensuring the will of the people was accurately reflected in the result was the bare minimum for any election audit.

This bill does not specify what will be audited. The decision regarding the operation of the audit is best left to the agencies conducting the audit.

Secondly, this bill authorises the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) to audit and monitor computer systems for unauthorised access internally and externally.

This is targeting both unauthorised access from within the system and unauthorised external access by malicious entities.

The Australia Signals Directorate is currently conducting a cyber “uplift program” at the Australian Electoral Commission. While the program is most welcome, there is no basis in the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 or the Intelligence Services Act 2001 for that program.

This bill brings legislation into line with current practice.

Mr President In May Senate estimates I asked the Australian Electoral Commission simple questions regarding their auditing. I was assured that audits are occurring. On no occasion then or since have the following questions been answered:

  • Who conducted the audit?
  • When was the audit conducted?
  • What was audited?
  • What was the result?
  • Have any changes been made as a result of the audit?

It is disturbing that such an audit could happen behind closed doors without direction or structure. It is more disturbing that this program has no legal basis in the Commonwealth Electoral Act.

We should not have to rely on the admirable conscientiousness of the Australian Signals Directorate. We should be able to rely on the completeness of our legislation.

Mr President I also looked at other issues around election integrity.

First up was a simple question: At the Senate Scanning Centre is the electronic data file containing each vote ever compared back to the paper ballot after the vote has been adjudicated?

That answer is no. At no time is the electronic record of a vote checked back against the paper ballot once the ballot is adjudicated.

Some disputed votes are held back and adjudicated later in the counting process, then filed away.

There is no routine sampling beyond that point. That is not acceptable.

The third part of my bill is for voter ID. Most of the recommendations in the ANAO report, that was never followed up, went to failures in the integrity of voter rolls.

It is too late to go back now and audit those rolls before the next election, by way of re-commencing residency checks, as ANAO recommended.

It is not too late for a quick fix – which is voter ID. Asking for simple identification will act as an audit on the rolls in real time, and ensure every vote cast was legitimate.

This is not my idea. Recommendation 21 of the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters Inquiry into the 2019 Federal Election called for voter identification to be introduced. This same finding was made in 2016 and 2013.

Schedule 2 of this bill is drafted to give effect to the committee recommendation as literally as possible.

Voters must present a form of acceptable identification to be issued with an ordinary pre-poll or election day vote. Authorised identification must be suitably broad so as to not actively prevent electors from casting an ordinary ballot.

This bill allows a wide range of acceptable voter ID. The AEC is empowered to make further regulations to ensure voters are not disenfranchised.

The AEC noted in their submission to the JSCEM inquiry that:

“multiple voting is frequently the subject of media commentary and social media speculation. Such a degree of focus is entirely understandable: there can hardly be a more emblematic component of trust in electoral results than ensuring eligible voters only exercise the franchise [appropriately].”

Multiple voting is a red herring in this debate. My bill is not concerned with multiple voting, it is concerned with ensuring every vote cast was made according to law.

The Commonwealth Electoral Act (Integrity of Elections Bill) 2021 is about protecting confidence in our elections.

The cyber integrity of our elections and the use of voter identification is essential to that confidence.

I recommend the Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Integrity of Elections) Bill 2021 to the Senate.

/2 Comments/by