A comment from Catherine: More to the point. Trans women aren't women. They're trans women 🎯

what do you expect when mental illness is normalized

Tactic straight out of the communist handbook. Except they used gender ideology and a rainbow flag instead of a Red one!

About 1.7% of the population have “mismatched” chromosomes, hormones or genitalia, is the implication of this post that those people have a psychological disorder? Just more scientifically illiterate hateful nonsense from a desperate bunch of morons, support for one notion is clearly the most common mental deficiency in this country at present. Absolutely disgraceful.

No..they are men in dresses not trans women

How is this even controversial ? What’s happening in the world, I know bloke like you Senator Malcolm Roberts know the amazing Australia that was. Why do we have to fight to have that kept alive. It was amazing, lots from different backgrounds, no marches, no bridge takeovers, no terrorists. What in gods name is happening?

Usual One Nation hatred

More to the point. Trans women aren't women. They're trans women

So is supporting one nation

I'm superman and I can fly. You all have to support my belief in this.

"𝘈𝘯𝘺 𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘺𝘪𝘦𝘭𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺 𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘥𝘳𝘢𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦. 𝘏𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘴, 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘴; 𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵, 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘴 𝘩𝘪𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘯 𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵." — 𝗚𝗲𝗼𝗿𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝗦𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗹, 𝘙𝘦́𝘧𝘭𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘳 𝘭𝘢 𝘷𝘪𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 (𝘗𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘴: 𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘭 𝘙𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘦̀𝘳𝘦, 1908). 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯: '𝘙𝘦𝘧𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘝𝘪𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦' (𝘓𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘯: 𝘎𝘦𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘦 𝘈𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘯 & 𝘜𝘯𝘸𝘪𝘯, 1915). #Resistance #Violence #PoliticalAction #Duty

I see the little Goblin is hard at work. 🐈

It's Bex and a good lie down time, Mal

Absolutely 😳

Not true, there's also religion.

Don't be so free with the impossible word, advances in the future may make it possible even though that would create yet another potential nightmare.

That’s only because being a One Nation supporter is yet to be defined by clear set of diagnoses.

Religion sounds similar to me

Some will say being a ON senator is ALSO a mental illness

Flying was once impossible, but you growing as a human remains impossible. Gronk.

100%

100 % 👏👏👏

💯

Eventually most people will own an EV though, so this will be considered public infrastructure.

Everyone is either buying or about to buy EVs, so the charging infrastructure benefits everyone.

Because you have such a grip on reality Malcolm. I think I will fact check this.

Just practice that bulldozer noise for Gina Reinhardt...🚜 Brrrrrr.......Brrrrr.... 😂.

I don’t catch public transport, so why should I fund it?

And the AI centres

What is an EV power station?

As opposed to AI data centres which do the same thing to the energy grid but offers poor people the ability to generate a picture of Micky mouse kissing sonic the hedgehog

The obvious answer here is to put a charge (say $500) on every purchase of an EV vehicle that pays for the EV infrastructure.

we all pay for things we don’t use, I don’t use kids playgrounds but am happy to help fund them.

In the 5 hours it took you to write this pathetic post, the Australian fossil fuel industry received ~$10 million in subsidies. Can must allocate it to energy security and energy independence by encouraging EVs, chargers, and smarter choices.

Capitalism is a wealth distribution system but you don't criticise thst

About $1400 in low emission tech is fitted to the average diesel ute. There's a tax right there.

Been watching Malcolm being dissed on Sky News by commentators as a conspiracy theorist, saying Pauline & especially Barnaby struggling to clear up Malcolm's mess. Personally I agree with everything Malcolm has claimed & if he's ditched by ON half their base would leave.

$10 million dollars over what timeframe? Per year? If it’s per year, then what a joke of a gripe this is. Spread across the approximately 10 million households in Australia, this is about $1 per household to build infrastructure which will help to insulate our personal and goods transport nationwide from the extreme insecurity which exists in liquid fuel supply lines. Sounds like a bloody bargain to me. Even if it’s $10 million per quarter, that’s $4 per household per year. Still a bloody bargain. Everyone benefits from EV adoption, either indirectly due to reduced demand for liquid fuels which ICEV owners need, or directly through better access to charging for EV owners.

"could be added" Where is this information coming from?

Pay pay pay tax tax tax on borrowed money

Could? How much would the reduction on demand for petrol reduce fuel prices?

🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺

The incorrect inference that Little Mal is making here is that your taxes aren’t used to subsidise liquid fossil fuels. Perhaps he can explain what the Fuel Tax Credits Scheme or Fuel Security Services Payment are. This should be interesting…

All the EV owners I know, you wouldn't call wealthy. You can buy EVs for around the same price as ICE vehicles.

And yet if you drive all electric where subsidising petrol and desiel a measly 2 billion more than normal this financial year

Hold on tight as oil hits $200

Operation Mockingbird Australia edition.

Hahaha… how will the ABC and SBS stay on air?!

MEANING: They people will be censored more,it will be in there somewhere

It sounds like you're searching for another conspiracy

Sounds like they will consider changes. Whether or not they make changes is another thing.

Bias will mean ‘bias against the left’.

Noted: The Senator for Tinfoil is in favour of media bias.

"unearthed" Aka public available information

Looks like a very considered approach and surely you would support less bias in the media? Of course you only care about that if it is in your favour don’t you?

This is great news

Free Speech - shutting down the abc, sbs, not participating in interviews by the abc or the guardian. Free when it suits.

Fact-based reporting would be preferable for all media. The difference between editorial and news is skewed.

Isn't bias something that goes against free speech - just ask donny - and if that's what on is 'working to enshrine' then u need to re think senator. BTW the High court of Australia has already had something to say about free speech senator - have a read of what they think, might trump 😲😏😂 on ideas.

Senator Malcolm Roberts searching for his next conspiracy 🙄 Next post will be about the emergency broadcast I'm pretty sure.

Bias has been redefined. Like "what is a woman ? " Any person that identifies with telling the truth " is truth".

So does free speech in the media mean barring certain media from press conferences??? Asking for a friend.

Australia needs to become a republic with a bill of rights - which includes free speech, nobody takes the monarchy seriously anymore. 🤷‍♀️

They must be referring to “our ABC”, giving them too soft a ride

Sounds more like communist rule to me.

Appointing an independent body rather than just sticking the ABC board with right wing nutters.

Media is supposed to present both sides of the story ...not just Murdoch or Gina Rinehart viewpoints

What a joke .., they give tens of millions to Left-leaning media outlets already (Sky and Seven need not apply). Wolves in sheep’s clothing they are indeed.