Meanwhile, PH is being massively influenced by Rinehart, but we are not supposed to notice that.

The fella doesn't understand what it is being asked

Is 'take it on notice', code for "unprepared to answer questions"⁉️ Asking for a friend....

The community don’t need AHPRA to protect them from health professionals. The community need health professionals to protect them from AHPRA!

Thank you Senator Roberts, please do not lose heart. Your questions may awaken the conscience of fence-sitters in Parliament. I do hope so.

Thank you for your support for clinicians. We are leaving our professions in the UK & Australia because AHPRA are not fulfilling their business purpose to PROTECT the public due to the VEXATIOUS claims to AHPRA of whistle-blowers of preventable patient harm: 🔍 Dr Jillian Spencer Child Psychiatrist (QLD puberty blockers). 🔍 Dr Amos Psychiatrist (QLD puberty blockers). 🔍 Dr Simon Silgo GP (QLD covid vaccine). 🔍 Midwife Jackie Pulleine (QLD Patient Confidentiality), Metro North. 📢 Executive Director President of QNMU & ANMF. 📢 🔍 Clinical Midwife Consultant RBWH, Metro North Alicia Hyland (QLD Fake allegation of Occupational violence). I escalated repeated Coroners cases with reccomendations of 'education regarding identification & escalation of preventable patient harm' unable to implement because we have 5 DIFFERENT universities all teaching differently & a bullying culture causing: 👩‍🦰 1. MIDWIFE Merinda Hocken. Bullied by Team Leaders = SUICIDE 2015. 👱‍♀️ 2. MIDWIFE Bernadette Bennett. Bullied whistleblower by Unit Manager Sarah Kirby who used her to set me up = SUICIDE 2023. 👩‍🦳 3. MATERNITY ORGANISER Kim Ramsdale bullied whistleblower by Alana Geary Executive Director of Nursing & Midwifery, Metro North & 📢 QNMU Secretary & President 📢 = SUICIDE 2025. 👩‍🦰 4. CLINICAL FACILITATOR Samantha Jorna Bullied whistleblower, Metro South = SUICIDE 2025 📢 The Health Ministers Meeting oversee AHPRA are: Federal Health Minister Mark Butler MP & Tim Nicholls MP: NO ACTION.📢 📢 NMC board chair Veronica Casey & previous Executive Director Metro South 📢 OHO / NMC Investigators: 📢 Mary Sidebotham Set up Midwifery Education Griffith University & prev QLD RCM 📢 📢 Sarah Kirby Unit Manager Birthing RBWH 📢 QIRC Investigators: 📢 Prev QLD Chief Nurse Shelly Nolan. NO ACTION 📢 📢 Professor Jenny Gamble set up Midwifery Education Griffith University (Project 2000) & prev QLD RCM 📢 📢 Professor Mary Sidebotham set up Midwifery Education Griffith University (Project 2000) & prev QLD RCM, Clinical Council Maternal Morbidity UK & Australia, dismissed the Senior Sisters of Stepping Hill Hospital (Project 2000) Trial Site for bullying because of skills knowledge gaps. I was on the trial. It was set up for nursing by Betty Kersaw & Norma Hall (my mother). It was never intended for midwifery, but they copied it because the universities got rich & Betty became UK President of RCN & given an OBE. 📢 QLD Chief Midwife: Liz Wilkes 📢 previous QNMU lead Midwifery, prev QLD RCM, Owns MY Midwives Franchise. NO ACTION. 📢 📢 Univerity Associate Professors & Associate Deans = QLD Executive Directors of Nursing & Midwifery & Previous QNMU Secretary.📢 🔍These leaders block the escalation of preventable patient harm due to their own professional agendas & relationships.🔍 Are you listening Jason Clare, Yvette Cooper Andy Burnham please work TOGETHER & sort this out. ✅️ CLINICAL PRACTICE teaching, mentoring & assessment RETURN to Hospitals & 997 course with mentors 80% of all shifts TOGETHER to be confident, competent full scope of practice midwives on qualification. ✅️ Dept NATIONAL CURRICULUM that universities can all teach with ONE per hospital ONLY to STOP TURF WARS or professions & research politics & be SAFE. Including 📢 CLINICAL ANAESTHETISTS teaching 'BODY SYSTEMS & IDENTIFICATION & ESCALATION of DETERIORATING PATIENTS' because this is the Skills knowledge gap in EVERY HHS NHS Trust. 📢

I will take it on notice as always 🙈

Not answering the questions is he. Throwing off ill take that on notice

There’s a rather large difference between asking an accusatory question at Senate Estimates and proving the accusation contained in the question. Yes, AHPRA confirmed that it is a member of Pride in Diversity, an ACON workplace inclusion program, and participates in the Australian Workplace Equality Index. Yes, when Malcolm Roberts asked whether AHPRA had undertaken a formal assessment of whether that membership created an actual or perceived conflict of interest, AHPRA said it had not. But AHPRA did not admit that it was biased, ideologically captured or politically compromised. In fact, its CEO explicitly said he was confident the membership did not create a conflict and explained that regulatory decisions are governed by legislation and professional codes, made through independently appointed professional boards, and are subject to external review. The same sleight of hand occurs with the psychosis question. Roberts asked whether individual AHPRA caseworkers could distinguish a psychoanalytic use of "psychosis" from a psychotic disorder. AHPRA took the question on notice. "I'll take that on notice" is not an admission that caseworkers are incompetent, let alone that they are "weaponising ignorance." And the claim that AHPRA "basically admitted they have no defence" for doctors' legal costs is simply not what happened. Roberts asked about the cost of going to court, his allotted questioning time expired, and no such admission was made. So strip away phrases such as "radical ideological", "weaponising ignorance", "politicised", "bureaucratic overreach" and "progressive inclusion agendas", and what are we actually left with? Roberts asked a series of questions. Some were answered. Some were taken on notice. He then took his own accusations embedded in those questions and presented them as though the hearing had established them as facts. It didn't. An accusation followed by "I'll take that on notice" is not evidence that the accusation is true.

Great work Malcolm 🙌🏾

Thanks Senator Robert’s - please keep asking these hard questions, and holding this woke ideology to account.

They can't answer those questions without having the lobbyists like equality Australia getting upset.

conflict of interest (common english) = making money off of business deals while in a public office. conflict of interest (A legal definition) = Crossing jurisdictional lines. often, like malcom with his donation to vax companies, while ordering people to get more vax... wasnt judged as conflict of interest in law... it was clearly in common english!

Thank you for asking them these very important and revealing questions Senator Malcolm Roberts

The reason they take out CTO constantly is to keep the drug psychosis active so they can claim a life style of financial revenue .I've sent AHPRA emails stating our case and the medication got higher and the CTO were organised as one ran out. I have proof of malpractice manipulation and abuse of power so Iam quiet happy to take our case to court.

Waffle be the phon playbook

Good on you!

You mean the Gina that sued her own children out of their inheritance... Great human there!

some of these evasions of parliamentary inquiry are contemptuous. It's time for the estimates to use their powers to get answers. Public servants and ministers need to be referred to the Senate for contempt. It is time to stop the bureaucracy from thinking they can do what they like. Senate estimates has power. It just isn't using it.

AHPRA does not pass the pub test nor Senator Robert's excellent questions based on scientific evidence‼️

It's sad Malcolm thinks he makes sense, was he asking them for a diagnosis or something?

Go Malcolm, it’s about time that these questions were answered!

Thank you Malcolm for bringing the spotlight on ahpra who do more harm than good to doctors by pushing their ideological ideals rather than protecting the public.

Check their bank accounts and who their friends are, most likely dodge criminals in parliament.

The time, energy and money spent protecting the definition of “woman” would be better spent advocating for the vital and crumbling network of organisations that actually protect women. / Instead of safeguarding a definition on paper it is better to make sure there is a budget for trauma counselling, a budget to help women fleeing violence, seek shelter, and staff to help women living through hell. Celebrating the exclusion of 0.44% of the population from Rape Crisis is performative. / The public conversation has been so warped by this red herring. It seems like a deliberate distraction to shift the focus away from the systemic mistreatment and abuse of women. All they have done is build trans people up as a straw man, muddy the media waters, and allow men to continue to abuse women. / And part of the reason that this gender definition war has gained so much traction is because it has allowed men to feel comfortable participating in a “women’s rights” issue. Men can join in and claim they are soldiers for the rights of women, staunch feminists, et cetera. Because it is not really about women anymore, it’s a debate about identity politics. Women’s rights through this lens are no longer about men’s behaviour. It is no longer about gender-based violence, coercive control, abuse, sexual assault, or rape. It's now a philosophical argument about gender. And it’s convenient. The gender debate has taken men’s accountability off the table. The only women’s rights issues that get attention are the ones men allow to be noticed. The fight that matters to me is the one that protects women and ensures they don’t end up immolated or strangled by men in their lives. / Trans people are not a threat. Research shows that trans, non-binary, lesbian, gay, and bisexual people face higher rates of gender-based violence than anyone else. One in four trans people in a relationship has experienced domestic abuse from a partner. We should be concentrating on rooting out the rot, the reason that anyone would need to access Women’s Aid or Rape Crisis in the first place. Budget cuts have gutted the third sector. What’s more, numerous studies have indicated that gender-based violence is exacerbated during recessions.

Show the proof that the money goes back to the recipients.

Malcolm, please ask about NDIS using Ai to assess participants eligibility- I predict many will have their funding cut off due to Ai involvement in, and changes to eligibility criteria and assessment processes.

She just said it loud and clear ‘ going after ndis fraudsters doesn’t really benefit the government’ …… that’s yr answer as to why they aren’t going hard enough!!!! Different story if they were profiting more from it!

NDIS, providers are overcharging.

What background do all these pollies have in the portfolio they are put in

29000 tip offs ,25 convictions ,thus is a federal crime maybe we need more AFP

Not enough being done. 29,000 tip offs, 25 convictions ?

The money is NOT going back to disabled people The reality is the NDIA are stripping much needed money from many disabled people. Try honesty Jenny - or get honest advisors

So to me it sounds like the ndis is not checking the so called providers

Maybe spend more on convicting fraud than taking honest people to the ART and you may save some money

Yet two blokes on YouTube can out these filthy rorters within days yet it takes public servants years, go figure

She should manage a sweatshop in China Best stitchup ever

I think she should be on the ndis

Thorough and it costs money to investigate

How did all these people survive before NDIS came along ????

Why did this take so long?

what is she for real

How does a person access all the specialist care needed if they dont know how to function without daily care , they need to stamp out the bad care providers doing wrong and put people in touch with care providers that are doing the right thing care providers should of had regular audits and screening all along

I got disability pension and total permanent disability however im not eligible for any assistance and been homeless over a year how great to be an Australian

Horse 🐎 poop cut their salaries and make performance based payments instead

While the NDIS Fraud Fusion Taskforce loves to drop impressive numbers—29,000 tip-offs, payment blocks, and 25 criminal convictions—these stats only address the symptoms of a much deeper disease. Enforcing criminal law against a few "bad apples" is entirely useless when the regulatory architecture itself is built to invite systemic non-compliance. The real vulnerability sits upstream in the structural independence of Approved Quality Auditors (AQAs). Right now, NDIS providers seeking registration go out, select, engage, and directly pay their own private auditors. Let's call that what it is: an inherent commercial conflict of interest. When an auditor’s financial viability and repeat business depend on keeping their paying clients happy, strict compliance quietly bends. It becomes a commercial handshake behind a government badge, leaving everyday participants completely exposed. True regulatory independence can't survive on market-driven auditing. If we want actual safety, we need to look at models that actually work—like Aged Care, where the regulatory body directly allocates and pays the auditors so independence isn't just a marketing slogan on paper. Until the system fixes that backend commercial loophole, we're just paying for sanitised PR while the front door stays wide open.

Senator Malcolm Roberts how about we just make it easier to apply to NDIS? so some of us don't have to be waiting since Q4 2022 😑

Where is the governing body that should have kept this in check since it started?

The buzz word more funding so the money you save is spent on funding to stop the rorts?

Fraud Could you expand on why the One Nation person who was allegedly assaulted by students at the EKKA did not make a formal complaint to the police for such a serious crime resulting in serious injury? Could you also expand why in an area with security cameras and with a high saturation if people each with a phone capable of obtaining video or photographs not a single picture or witness had come forward ? Could you also expand on why the alleged victim has removed the report? Could it have been an internal attempt of filing a fraudulent report?

It's as crazy as ABC.

What a fantastic show of how to dodge the issues at hand

Let’s start by making the ABC a subscription channel so all Australians can enjoy it - that way we do not waste Australians tax payers money? Then start on the Creative Australian wastage.

So hate speech is okay if it’s considered art

So if you reverse the situation And you had persons bagging out Labor ,then you would fund it ? Hahaha not likely

Wow! Restore integrity and accountability! 🥰🙏☦️💝 We are predominantly a Christian country. We do allow others their choice of spiritual worship within their own communities, not to be demanded that Christianity should bow down to it, but accept that there are spiritual nuisances that need to discerned and any negative connotations should not be subjected to the wider community. As for LGBTQR, sexualising preferences are a private matter, that is why they are referred to as intimate. Sexualising preference should not become a public display to be celebrated! I don't see heterosexuals having madigras about their choices. Madigras have been accepted for too long! Young minds need to be protected, firstly by their parents, secondly as a duty of the greater community. No one should be shamed, even if they choose differently to the status quo. We are all under the banner of humanity, and this must have its protective boundaries for the greater good of all.💝☦️🙏🥰

I would like to apply for one of these grants. I will need at least 500,000 to buy alot of tea towels for people to come up and burn them. I wonder if I would get a grant?

That's not art are you kidding me. Lmao 😂🤣

".. well you are now.." He looked like he was having his own " poetic" Oh Fruck moment. ❣️

He can’t answer money going ONE sided

Funding Labour votes

There should be no money going to kinder garden art projects 😂

Well Done Malcolm. Keep up the good work!

Creative Australia-The organisation has since acknowledged gaps in its contracts and is reviewing policies to allow termination of grants when artists engage in hate speech or extremist advocacy The organisation needs to ensure it meets societal norms.

Time to Trim Canberra. Big Trim coming. Here comes the Orange wave. Vote ONP

How bout our Aussie culture? 🤡🤡 Go ON 🧡💪🇦🇺 Thank you Malcolm

It’s called one rule for those Labor have allegiances with and continue to do so. Yet others are treated like criminals for free speech.

Freedom of expression is ok and publicly funded unless it’s an expression or views the government don’t agree with in which case you can go to jail for expressing them.

Are you prattling about Gina's portrait? Art captures what the eye does not see. In that sense it was as if she was in the room.

Tax payers should get our money back!

Hate speech laws are clearly only for deployment against white Christian or conservatives Australian citizens.

Why are we paying for this crap? Any artist worth his or her salt would be able to pay their own way in life. Maybe if they did they wouldn’t have so much time to spend going to the ubiquitous protests in our ever growing and divisive country.

Keep it up Senator Malcolm 👏👏👏

Not when it involves hate

Funding, a much misused word. In the context where politicians and public servants use the word Funding, it’s actually code for “other people’s money”. Now I’ve got absolutely no issue with artists expressing whatever floats their boat, but not on my money. We seem to have gotten far away from respecting other people’s hard earned, and putting it to the highest and best use for the betterment of the country.