Well said Senator Malcolm Roberts. We need to hear from those who have witnessed and can provide information on their experience. Long live a free Australia.

Persia? Put New Holland's security first....

Would she be able to emigrate to Australia under ON's immigration policy?

Corruption ?Just wondering?

Have you got MS Malcom?

Are you referring to Iran? Persia hasn't been used since 1935

We’re getting confused because we’re being told by government and media that we have to pick: monoculture OR multiculturalism. We don’t. Monoculture is the common ground. One country, one law, one language, shared values like a fair go. Multiculturalism is the stories we bring to that ground. Different backgrounds, food, faiths, and 65,000+ years of Indigenous culture. You need both. One gives us unity. The other gives us strength. Stop turning it into a war. We’re one team with many different backgrounds and stories

Senator Malcolm Roberts her opening line is concerning... Iranian-Australian?... She is still choosing to identify as Iranian first despite now calling Australia home. She should refer to herself as an Australian-Iranian.

Malcom’s Robert’s is a man of high integrity and truely cares for the Australian people and our way of life that’s currently being eroded with each passing day by a very toxic government hell bent on destroying us. Labor, Greens and Liberals cannot be trusted so lm hedging my bets on a veteran who really does care about Australia 🇦🇺 and it’s citizens One Nation Or No Nation

Much respect Sen. Roberts.. true passion for this great land and it’s people.. 🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺 What a moron David Shoebridge is, trying to silence Sen. Roberts regarding what is happening not only here but around the world, good to see that he was put back in his place. 🧡🇦🇺🧡🇦🇺

Please stop the Muslim talk. Don't have to read someone's opinion letter to us. We can read about the ME and make up our own minds as to why the west is bombing their countries. They are not the problem.

So much truth

Look at the UK!!

Ots fkn true shoebrigde a gronk!!😡😡😡

More zio virtual signalling expected more from Senator Malcolm Roberts

Interesting how a refugee suddenly becomes a credible voice when her story fits your politics. Refugees aren’t a threat when they support your narrative—they’re proof that people fleeing persecution can become valued

Malcolm the MAN

Doing a good job mate

I respectfully urge your office to take cognisance of this matter, because law without conscience becomes convenience, and justice without humanity becomes selective compassion. Dear Prime Minister of Australia, I'm writing not simply as a petitioner seeking redress, but as a human being asking whether justice still has a conscience. What haunts me is not just the financial loss, but the length of this cruelty and psychological persecution, which began with prolonged injustice and indifference, and the kind of discrimination that does not leave bruises on the skin but fractures a human being from within. I do not wish to become another forgotten name in a bureaucratic file, another foreign worker who served, suffered, and was quietly erased. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) declares in Article 1 that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights, and Article 2 rejects discrimination of any kind, including based on nationality. These are not decorative words for speeches. They are promises humanity made to itself. And yet my experience forces a deeply uncomfortable question: Do human rights end at national borders? Does dignity come stamped on a passport? Is empathy a privilege reserved only for citizens? If a foreign worker collapses under exploitation, does it matter less because they are “outside” the system’s circle of concern? This is not only my personal tragedy. It is a moral test, one that any institution claiming to uphold justice must be willing to face honestly. I am an Indian citizen, 59 years old, recently diagnosed with an advanced and life-threatening cardiac condition: critical triple-vessel coronary artery disease, with 80–95% blockages in my LAD, LCx, and RCA arteries. I underwent open-heart surgery (CABG) on 27th October 2025 under Dr Devi Prasad Shetty (a legendary doctor in the world) at the Narayana Institute of Cardiac Sciences, Bengaluru. I am currently in the recovery phase. I have had moderate sloping hearing loss in the right ear (58.33 dBHL) and mild sloping SN hearing loss in the left ear (38.33 dBHL) since 2016. What is the purpose of establishing regulatory institutions, grievance mechanisms, and administrative remedies if, in the end, an ordinary individual is forced to approach the courts to receive basic justice? Courts are meant to be the last refuge, not the first and only doorway to fairness. When systems designed specifically to investigate grievances, correct injustices, and protect workers fail to act meaningfully, the burden falls entirely on the victim. More importantly, I no longer possess the physical or mental capacity for such an ordeal. I am a 59-year-old recovering from major open-heart surgery. My body is still healing from coronary artery bypass grafting, and my doctors have advised a period of calm recovery and careful rehabilitation. The stress of pursuing an extended legal battle in a foreign jurisdiction, one that could stretch across years, is not merely burdensome; it is medically dangerous. Justice that requires a sick person to exhaust their remaining strength to pursue it ceases to be justice at all. If grievance bodies, oversight institutions, and administrative channels exist only to tell an individual to “go to court eventually,” then their existence becomes symbolic rather than meaningful. Such a system effectively privileges those who are wealthy, healthy, and powerful enough to endure litigation, while quietly excluding those who are vulnerable, financially strained, or physically unwell. This creates a form of structural inequality in which the promise of justice exists in theory but remains inaccessible in practice. It is precisely for situations like mine, where power, resources, and institutional access are deeply unequal, that administrative and diplomatic mechanisms are meant to intervene. Otherwise, the message delivered to ordinary individuals is painfully clear: justice is available, but only to those who can afford to fight for it. For over a decade, I have suffered systemic wage theft connected to my work with an Australian company based in Melbourne. I have incurred a financial loss equivalent to two years’ wages, commissions, and entitlements that were withheld from me. Most disturbing of all is the reality that I worked 996 hours at an unsustainable wage of $6.70 per hour, an amount that cannot be defended as fair compensation in any civilised system. I also rendered several months of unpaid service before the formalisation of our employment agreement. I personally bear the costs of marketing, travel, and essential business expenses, believing, like any sincere professional, that fairness would follow contribution. Instead, I was met with exploitation that hid itself behind procedure, and silence that disguised itself as administration. I have been seeking justice since July 2015. For over ten years, I have sent emails, 235-page documents, explanations, and appeals, reaching out repeatedly to Australian authorities and institutions. I followed every process demanded of me, trusting that patience and the law would eventually result in fairness. Instead, I have seen how systems often function when a person is not powerful enough to be heard: they delay until the human being grows tired, grows older, grows weaker, or disappears. Withholding wages is not simply delaying payment. It is to delay food, housing, medical care, and stability. It is to force a person into survival mode, and then pretend the consequences are unrelated. Even now, after undergoing a surgery that has rearranged my life at its core, I am not recovering in peace. Recovery requires rest, safety, and reassurance. But what I live with instead is the continued weight of being ignored and the constant anxiety of financial ruin. I want it recorded somewhere, by someone who still believes in justice, that my life had value, my work had worth, and my dignity was not optional. Prime Minister, if a human being must plead for basic fairness while recovering from open-heart surgery, then something is wrong, not only with a company, but with the moral spine of the Australian institutions that permitted this silence to continue. I’m unemployed and request your immediate and compassionate intervention so that I may recover without fear of destitution, and so that those responsible for this prolonged moral failure are held accountable. Kind Regards, Gopal ROYCHAUDHURI MBA & MS (Econ) Centring International Relations, Trade Buildout & Striking Cross-Border Collaboration and Partnerships Over Three Decades. globalrelations@roychaudhuri.com twitter.com/GC_ArizonaUSA

The Audio is way is out of sinc

I would think science and climate denialism is a belief system and a threat to EVERYONE'S safety... Even you, Mr Senator... And how old do you think the Earth is again, Sir? 🌎 🤔... Vote carefully, everyone! 🗳....

BIG CLAIMS REQUIRE BIG EVIDENCE Every political party has the right to propose bold policies. Every Australian has the right to ask for the evidence. If One Nation believes its policies will lower the cost of living, improve housing, strengthen the economy or make Australia safer, then show Australians the research, the modelling and the implementation plan. * What independent analysis supports the policy? * What are the expected costs and benefits? * What evidence suggests it will work in Australia? * What are the risks and trade-offs? * Which experts have reviewed it? This isn’t about left versus right. It’s about making decisions based on facts, not faith. Don’t just ask what a party promises. Ask what evidence supports those promises.

Very well said Senator!!! Finally…a Real Man. Speaking REAL TRUTH. Solidarity Mate.

Not just words... Facts. Thanks senator Senator Malcolm Roberts