“Operational factor” means we wanted to shame him publicly

A good question would be, did the AFP make /suggest changes to the what a non-combatant requirements are from the 7 elements to a single 1?

The AFP sound like a Yes Minister show.

When Australian military are trained, they are taught repeatedly about the rules of engagement. If soldiers do not follow these instructions a reasonable way, then there may be consequences. With all the politicisation of the issue, ON are completely involved in this part, then the trial will become more complicated due to the media exposure. Let the courts and AFP do their jobs. The media leak was inappropriate and I hope that it is addressed, but let it be while the legal process continues.

Watts the cane toad doing there. Must be a free lunch on later.

Chem trails?

All part of the “greater plan” and in line with “modelling”.

Ah, I get it now after watching this - it's all tall poppy syndrome! Ex defence force person with some power targeting the high achiever at any cost.

So I'm going to pull this apart, but also want people to watch the two videos. So the AFP met BRS at the airport with quite a few the AFP members handcuffed him and paraded him through the airport..... Now compare another AFP scenario let's go to the ISIS Brides. They had free rain of the airport, not handcuffed, there were more than 30 Muslim men guiding/protecting the Brides from the two... yes two AFP following behind with a very "scared" look on their faces. The a man openly swore at a reporter, nothing happened ie wasn't confronted by AFP (so the reporter was protected). So again it's pretty fking obvious who's running Australia, pretty plain to see who's a traitor to the Australian people, pretty obvious that we are fk'd ........

Just look at the AFPs body language and eye / facial movements, telling.

The federal government has allocated roughly $320.5 million total to the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI) and spent around $231 million on broader war crimes probes, rather than a single specific figure for Ben Roberts-Smith alone. The overall expenditure covers multiple investigations, not just the case against Mr. Roberts-Smith

She cant answer questions.

Was it because of the titanic and the captain. Smith or was I captain Thomas William my ancestry

Murray watts waiting to jump in and deflect

I got this reply from a post I made 👌 Bernard Strickland Norway has a different setup and we've missed that boat unfortunately. They haven't made trillions from taxing resources, they made it by investing that tax money and legislating that it can't be touched for 30 years. Now that 30 years has passed they still can only use a portion of the invested money by legislation. We need to scrap the PRRT and raise the witholding tax so that they make more money by leaving profits in Australia so we can tax them fully, instead of transferring them overseas to places like Ireland. Sorry to say Pauline doesn't have the answers or the skills to fix anything, even though I like her as a person. The only real solution at this point in time I believe is to put support toward someone like Gerard Rennick People First Party that has real experience in finance and taxation, and has a solid vision and costed plans for a future. After some research I have found that it could be possible that if One Nation and People First Party came together it would greatly improve Australia and benefit all citizens striving for a better future 🇦🇺👌 We Need better and safer living standards 👌 Also Free Medical and Free Education to support our younger generation to progress in making Australia better and all Taxpayers that have worked hard all their lives , comfortable in retirement 👌🇦🇺😊

He was setup

How can a trial by media be a fair trial?

Kangaroo court. Need to happen in Sydney. Jury would been made all migrants. Most likely the ones he at war with so they. Jury turn on him if Brisbane it would been hard due most like be Australia in the Jury.

They arrested him that way after tipping off the media so they could get their version out first. Get ahead of the narrative.

Thank you Malcolm. 🇦🇺🇦🇺

Maybe stop sending them to war….. maybe spend more effort in collaboration, in partnership, understanding. Accept differences….

A fair trial, it shouldn't even go to trial.

They would’ve got more results looking for political corruption

Still couldn't answer the question at hand about the money. Went on defensive

Murray might have confidence in the AFP but the Australian people don't, when we see the commissioner let the deputy talk for her we stop and think that she doesn't run AFP like we believe

Anti-vax cooker be cookin’

If the Australian people paid for the research the Australian people should own the patents.

Thank you Senator Malcolm Roberts for your continuous efforts on keeping everyone safe

Didn’t they stop aluminium pots?

Thank you malcolm 🙏🏻

Is this regarding the Moderna lab being built in Vic senator?

Awesome questioning Malcolm.

What's important is who's excempt, that will give you a guide to what's safe ?

Thank you SEN Roberts. Nobody but you is asking the hard questions

Thankyou Malcolm Roberts for all you're doing..Jesus was also mocked n ridiculously persecuted...we the people, can handle that...thankyou for standing up, for what's the integrity of our souls, the true ones...those that mock us, are evil...and they have lost....🔔🔔🔔🔔💯💜💚🙏🙏❤️❤️

The First Rule of the Dunning Kruger Club is.. you don't know you're a member of the Dunning Kruger Club.

Keep cooking Mal

Good on you Malcolm..💜🇦🇺

How much aluminium do you reckon you take in from your tinfoil hat, Mal?

If we the Australian people fund it we own it

Love your hard work Senator Malcolm Roberts 👌

One nation all the way

All Australians should know

Transparency!

Good science is based on rigorous testing and investigation. If the science can't withstand the questions of transparency, that says something more about the science than the person asking questions. Accountability, responsibility and transparency are the public's right to know. The old slogan of 'trust the science', doesn't pass the pub test anymore without due diligence, and if the scientists are offended by the question, or can't answer the question, obviously there's a problem. Big dollar spends deserve answers and accountability to the people. To ask a question that many would like to know the answer to, does not warrant disrespect. If the science is solid, there shouldn't be a problem with providing the answer. If the funding is being wasted, or the product is causing harm, that's a problem. If the results impacted your family, you'd want to know. The minister is doing his job and is asking fair and reasonable questions. To resort to name calling to try to diminish his character, is an admission of failure and exhausted intelligence on those responsible.

Thank you, Malcolm Roberts. Staggering amounts of taxpayer money, apparently down the drain. Funny how these eye-wateringly well paid people never seem to come prepared with a few notes on an Excel spreadsheet about their multi million dollar projects. Date: Grant amount: Recipient/s: Title of Grant: Project leader: Progress statement: Outcome statement: Return on investment. Recipient of profits: Benefits to taxpayers. It’s not hard. (I hadn’t even read Malcolm Roberts’ own statement. This was just in response to the interaction.) You’d want more feedback than that if you’d sent him out to buy coffee ☕️ ☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️

Keep on them

You are awesome Malcom

This is Malcolm summed up

So the peer review goes on trust, not on science, what if that scientist is in fact not a trustworthy scientist