My latest article in the Spectator Australia.
UK Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, doesn’t know Anthony Albanese particularly well. It was clear from the outset, despite their embraces on stage.
Opening his Renew Britain speech, Starmer confused the room by saying the Australian Labor Party won ‘a landslide victory earlier this Summer’.
The fact-check: Albanese attracted one of the lowest primary votes in recorded history during an Autumn election.
‘A key part is standing up to the divisive politics of the Right…’
Starmer’s complaint about division loosely translates as ‘anything that divides public opinion from government policy’.
Leaders frightened of public opinion are redefining debate as divisive. If the ghost of Churchill so-much as side-eyes Starmer, he wraps himself in the Online Safety Act like an infant dragging its blanket around.
➡️ Read the full article here: Albanese’s socialist love-in with Starmer
Well written Malcom.
Sex discrimination. The current sex discrimination act is totally invalid. One Judge recently indicated sex is changeable? If so, then how can anyone discriminate on the basis of sex if this is interchangeable? Or do we all discriminate? Certainly, term like boy, girl, man, woman become useless as we have no way of ever knowing a person’s identity or choice.
How can treat people unjustly on the basis of sex if this constantly changes at any moment in time?
Discrimination is recognition and understanding between one thing and another. It is impossible to recognise one’s sex when this can change at anytime
Therefore, all current people before our courts for sex discrimination should have their cases immediately thrown out of court. .
The only true marker of recognition and difference is our biology. (or as some prefer the sex assigned at birth). Therefore the sex discrimination act must be amended to include this fact that biological sex is the only way truly recognise one’s sex. Otherwise, there is no case for any discrimination.
Should business be involved in Politics? Yes. While we focus on the cost of housing and energy crisis as consumers. We tend to forget that much of government policy actually effects business. when business faces increased costs and regulation this drives inflation and costs to everyone.
What need is to form policies that actually make doing business easier and less costly thus creating wealth, jobs and opportunities. This will in turn stimulate the economy and bring down prices.
Energy policy must be about generation of more power at less cost. Solar and Wind do exactly the opposite. They are intensely costly to set up and only productive 30% of the time. So why do we support this nonsense?