Posts

Rejecting All Extremism

,

One Nation calls out all forms of extremism.

One Nation rejects all radicals who seek to divide Australians, whether they come from the Left or the Right.

Let me be clear – we do not reject Australians who proudly identify with their nation and want to preserve our sovereignty, freedoms and culture. That’s patriotism, not extremism.

Australia belongs to ordinary Australians, not ideological activists.

Young Australians deserve better than to be exploited and radicalised by political movements. They deserve leaders willing to confront extremism wherever it appears, not politicians who turn a blind eye when it suits them.

One Nation won’t look away.

We will call out extremism in all its forms. Even when it’s not politically convenient.

https://youtu.be/VyUV3LpKll0

Transcript

Immigration is the question of our generation. How we answer it will determine what sort of Australia moves into the next era. The majority of Australians believe we’re headed for disaster—at least half want immigration paused entirely. Will we continue to be a Western democracy with European roots, with Western Anglo-Celtic heritage and Aboriginal cultures, and a robust dedication to principles of freedom, faith, enterprise, democracy, fairness and equality? Are we to retain the echo of Christian values in our laws and culture? Young people are the ones preparing to live in the Australia that we leave behind. Many fear the character of Australian is being lost under the dual forces of mass immigration and multiculturalism, creating resentment and anger. To be put last in your own country is a crime. 

The government’s digital duty of care is an assault on democracy, attempting to brand One Nation as radical, fringe or even dangerous would bring us under the pending social media duty of care bill. It’s Orwellian. It’s a self-defence reflex from parties with no idea of how to fix their plummeting polls. Why else have those opposite branded us populists if it weren’t for the unpopularity of their party? A populist, simply described, is a politician who accepts our role to serve the people. The Left spit the word ‘populist’ out of their mouths like poison; I quite like the taste. 

When was the last time Anthony Albanese and Angus Taylor spent the week on public transport? Have they ever feared for their safety, coming home at night or sitting on a packed bus without a single word of English? Anthony Albanese purchased a cliff-top mansion. Does he know what it’s like to stand in line behind 50 people for a rental, knowing the process is hopeless? 

Young people’s lives are getting smaller, poorer, lonelier and more foreign. This is not integration; it’s abandonment. The emergence of lost, angry and disillusioned young people is not a surprise; it’s inevitable. Many have been swooped up and radicalised into communist, socialist and Islamist aligned movements. From cradle to degree, they fed a lie that protesting is the same as productivity. No-one is coming to rescue them because their outrage is useful for government policy.  

Existential terror about the planet helps keep Canberra able to give green grants to big business and foreigners and creates thankyou jobs for politicians who wrote their Green election slogans with the tears of children. Many young people have achieved spiritual purpose from being part of something grand—a literal fight against supposed evil, without understanding the historical horrors of the movements they’ve joined. Activist ringleaders exploit the emotional vulnerability of futureless young people to manipulate them into being ideological soldiers. And they’re not the only extremists employing this abuse. The Neo-Nazis do it too.  

One Nation disavows all radicalism. We oppose it even at the cost of votes. These groups are not welcome. When it comes to handling extremism, plenty of ministers in Canberra have turned a blind eye to children calling for the murder of Pauline Hanson, violence against One Nation supporters and for conservatives to be imprisoned. This is radicalisation. Why have senior Labor ministers wrongly tried to imply this radicalisation is justified instead of showing moral leadership? Tell the young that these violent and fascist slogans shouted at their rallies are wrong. Left-wing activism is not harmless. Soon these children will hold a majority vote. How will Labor address the rising violence on the Left when you refuse to stand up against it now? Are you afraid you’ll lose an election? Is that how cheaply your conscience is bought?  

One Nation has no such cowardice. Neo-Nazis, white supremacists, nationalists and ethno-nationalist exist in this country. We disavow them completely. They stand in opposition to everything One Nation believes. These groups are a gut punch to the story of Australia, as is the growth in numbers of communists, socialists, Marxists, decolonisers and Islamists. We have racial land, racial taxes, racial privilege and racial parliaments all in violation of our founding principles. That’s extremism. 

There’s a growing sea of angry, radicalised young people in this country who know nothing of where their own rhetoric leads. Instead of helping them, Labor and the Greens are preying on them. Last week, I rang the alarm in a Spectator article against those conservatives who are in danger of manipulation and violence from extremists. Since then, I’ve been threatened repeatedly. That’s why I’m now doubling down. My challenge to all sides of politics is to stand up against extremism in all its forms. If you won’t, you have no moral justification for attacking One Nation, who are calling out extremism in all its ugly forms. 

/0 Comments/by

Millions Support One Nation

,
Free speech, open debate and the restoration of Australia

The political landscape in Australia is changing. There is no question about that. Some call it the rise of ‘Populism’. Others prefer to frame it as a return to common sense.

Public sentiment is changing because Australians are fed up with years of lies and bad governance.

They are demanding that government do a better job and stop wasting money.

Specific demands to restore Australia – taxes, migration, regulation – have been laid out in the public forum. Public demand is not a mystery to solve. It’s a list titled, ‘Fix these things!’ handed to politicians.

The Labor-Liberal uniparty are simply not listening.

Or if they are listening, they are choosing to ignore the public.

This is why Australians are joining One Nation.

Our growing support has nothing to do with ‘evil social media’, online ‘misinformation’, the ‘spread of hate’, or ‘grievance politics’. No. Our popularity is the Australian public expressing their survival instinct against an increasingly expensive, unreasonable, and incompetent government.

Voters know that One Nation DOES listen.

We do care. We want a better Australia – for everyone.

Unlike the uniparty, which seems happy to govern over the ashes of Australia, we want rich pastures and pristine landscapes – metaphoric and literal.

One Nation are the last true conservatives, the last environmentalists, and the last party the serves both small business and workers.

We do not see Australia as landscape of race, class, and religious conflict. We believe it’s a hub for healthy financial and ideological competition with free speech as the pinnacle of innovation. After all, if we are not able to speak our minds, how could we possibly debate the best possible future?

And yet, instead of conceding that decades of failure can be fixed with a return to basics, the uniparty has locked arms to counteract ‘evil Populism’ which they see as the greatest threat … to themselves. At no point have Labor and the Coalition combined to talk about the restoration of Australia. It took a uniparty popularity crisis for them to act. This, if nothing else, shows you where their priorities sit – with themselves.

One Nation is facing this increasingly intolerant and jealous political force. A uniparty movement whose followers are leaning on sometimes violent speech and disturbing demands.

It’s our view that the Left has become dangerous.

One Nation have always – and will always – defend free speech and open debate.

These are the foundations of our democracy and the wider civilisational idea of the Enlightenment.

However, we are also aware of the legacy of violence and political persecution perpetrated by left-wing regimes throughout history.

Mao’s Great Leap.

Stalin’s Cannibal Island.

The Killing Fields of the Khmer Rouge.

On and on it goes. An endless list of murder, slavery, and horror perpetrated in the name of collective power.

It always starts the same – with the radicalisation of young people.

What begins as a few chants about murdering a political leader or imprisoning their followers – shouted from the mouths of people too young to understand what they’re saying – ends in a disaster for every citizen.

Extreme politics does not end with the political figures it targets. It ends with the collapse of democracy, the erasure of history, and the refashioning of objective truth into propaganda.

One Nation believes there’s a clear line between debate and language that normalises hostility or encourages others to treat political opponents as legitimate targets of violence.

It’s my view that Jim Chalmers, Anthony Albanese, and now Michelle Rowland are in danger of encouraging or, at the very least, remaining idle while those who align with their political movement cross that line.

Listen to this speech from the Prime Minister following One Nation’s spectacular victory in Secret Harbour:

Following One Nation raising a complaint, the Attorney-General appeared to victim-blame Pauline Hanson and One Nation, suggesting that Ms Hanson should, quote: ‘reflect on her own behaviour and her party’s ideology’.

In recent weeks we’ve seen children call for violence against Pauline. Threats of violence graffitied on public places. Threats of violence left on our social media accounts. Around the world, conservative figures have been murdered or almost killed at the hands of left-wing radicals. When these uncivilised tragedies occur, educators, commentators, and left-wing political figures have either openly cheered or called for more violence. This is shocking.

When the Prime Minister takes the stage and uses misinformation and disinformation to falsely paint a grassroots political opposition as ‘a threat to democracy’ – he shames himself and his office. He is partaking in the normalisation of extremism on the Left.

Young people on the left take their lead from the Prime Minister.

As Senator Hanson said, quote:

‘What he’s doing is putting me in a position of threats against me now that I have to have federal police protection whenever I’m out here, meeting people. It’s a shame. He’s caused this. I don’t want it. I want to feel safe in my own country.’

So, what’s the truth?

The truth is the Albanese government has abused the trust of Australians. Their tax hikes have made people poorer. Their policies have oppressed and marginalised honest, hard-working people. And businesses are collapsing. Voters want hope. They want change. They want peace.

And again, I say – shame on Albanese for trying to paint his political opposition as a threat to Australia simply because he’s too weak and incompetent to save his government.

One Nation is polling as high as 30%. Millions of Australians support One Nation. These are ordinary citizens who want change. Our supporters are not extremists. Can Labor and the Greens say the same?

Ministers should not use language that encourages the public to treat them as something to fear.

The Attorney-General should never imply that threats against Australians are somehow understandable because of how they vote.

Instead of asking why Australians are walking away from them, Labor is choosing to vilify those Australians and heighten the risk to them from other members of the public. The Coalition aren’t much better. Certainly, they are more jaded.

It’s also worth noting the staggering discrepancy between ‘outrage’ for the safety of high-profile women.

When a campaign against Jacinta Allan used the phrase, ‘ditch the witch’ – Labor ministers and media erupted in outrage. The Prime Minister declared it ‘totally unacceptable’. It became a national lecture on sexism.

What about kids marching in the street, shouting for Pauline Hanson to be killed and her face drawn onto images of a pig?

Not so much as a comment.

This isn’t speculative. A few weeks ago, at the height of this rhetoric, a One nation staffer, a grandmother, was assaulted and hospitalised while wearing a One Nation shirt.

We are constantly told by government officials that more must be done to prevent violence against women. Which is absolutely correct. So why is violent, misogynistic rhetoric excused when it supports the Labor cause?

Why is one woman’s safety treated as less important than another woman’s?

It’s a dangerous moment when Australia’s first legal officer refuses to condemn threats against a fellow female politician and instead blames her for them.

When the Prime Minister was evacuated from his home in February due to security threats, Pauline responded by saying, ‘Violence is not the answer – we have to have free speech, free debate and make our choice felt at the ballot box.’

That is the standard every elected leader should uphold.

/1 Comment/by

One Nation is Proud to be a Populist Party

,

Senator Hanson recently spoke about record immigration and the human catastrophe this is causing to everyday Australians. The Australian newspaper described her words as ‘populist’. Among members of the news media, or commentariat, that label offers mythical protection, insulating them from having to actually discuss the issues we’re raising.

The commentariat may be interested in the definition of ‘populist’ being ‘a politician who strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups’. Damn right!

The elites have been ignoring everyday Australians’ concerns for 50 years. Populist is exactly who we are in One Nation—a party that cares about everyday Australians and the financial, housing, social, and medical crisis now engulfing us.

I’m proud that One Nation talks with the people and listens to what they have to say. I’m proud One Nation votes in the best interest of Australians in parliament and I’m proud our supporters have the courage to stand up for what’s right.

This country might not be in such a dire state if other political parties in Parliament showed the same level of interest in the concerns of everyday Australians as One Nation does. Instead, they, along with the commentariat, seem to view the term ‘populist’ as a slur, as if it challenges their self-perceived superiority and arrogance.

I will continue to represent the interests of everyday Australians!

Transcript

Last week Senator Hanson spoke about record immigration and the human catastrophe it’s causing everyday Australians. The Australian newspaper described her words as ‘populist’. Among the commentariat, that label offers mythical protection, preventing them from having to actually discuss the issues we’re raising. The commentariat may be interested in the definition of ‘populist’ being ‘a politician who strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups’. Damn right! The elites have been ignoring everyday Australians’ concerns for 50 years. Populist is exactly who we are in One Nation—a party that cares about everyday Australians and the financial, housing, social and medical crisis now engulfing us. 

I’m proud that One Nation talk with the people and listen to what people have to say. I’m proud One Nation votes in parliament for the best interest of Australians, and I’m proud our supporters have the courage to stand up for what’s right. This country would not be so far down the toilet if other parties in this place were as interested as One Nation is in the wants and needs of everyday Australians. Instead, they, like the commentariat, spit the word ‘populist’ from their mouths as if it were poison—as if it were an affront to their self-perceived superiority and arrogance. 

Such contempt for the word ‘populist’ comes from a deep-seated sense of superiority amongst inner-city elites and their champagne socialist ideology—socialists whose wealth insulates them and their ideologies from human outcomes. These are the people who eat the food and drink the wine grown on farms that the same champagne socialists demonise as enemies of their net zero revolution—farmers who they wish would get off their land to make way for solar panels, wind turbines and powerlines erected in the bush so city socialists don’t have to look at them. All the while, they pat themselves on the back about how worthy they are, under the hubris of their spiritual guide and leader, the World Economic Forum, which steals wealth and sovereignty from everyday Australians on behalf of globalist, parasitic billionaires. 

To them, it doesn’t matter that we Australians don’t want to have our cars taxed until we can no longer afford to keep them; be locked into 15-minutes cities; never again be allowed to travel where we want, when we want and how we want; be living in homes rented from the billionaires because land taxes forced us to give up our own homes; be forced to rent furniture and whitegoods because green taxes made it too expensive to buy; and be forced to eat bugs and forced give up red meat in favour of cancerlike fake meat cultured in bioreactors. Who owns the companies making this slop? It is the same billionaires campaigning against red meat. 

And what is the greatest threat of all? It is digital currency that comes with a use-by date. Spend every cent of the money you earn or your money expires. There’ll be no saving and no passing wealth on to our children. Australians will live in economic and physical slavery, except those wealthy and well connected under a different set of rules. 

When the commentariat dismiss us as populist, this is what they’re covering up. These people are the billionaires’ little minions—brainwashed ideologues and those simply greedy for money and power, operating in the bureaucracy, the media, corporations and parliaments around the world. Soviet Russia called these people the nomenklatura, and there’s evidence they’re in Australia, including here in this Senate. My words will be interpreted as some form of class warfare. Yes, they are. It was not One Nation, though, that started a war on working Australians. It will be One Nation that finishes it and wins it. 

Right now, fortunately, the public are waking to see the voice behind the curtain. The greed and ruthless self-interest are now obvious amongst the billionaires and the nomenklatura. This will not be an exercise in free will. You will be forced to comply. The elements of the control agenda are being shaped right now. 

The Digital ID Bill is on tomorrow’s Senate schedule. This bill ensures every Australian has a government-backed digital identity that must be shown to access daily services: transport; shopping; banking, including ATMs; the internet; and much more. If you’ve heard the phrase ‘papers, please’ in connection with totalitarian regimes and wondered how people accepted that, wonder no more. The legislation can be used to prevent troublesome populists like One Nation from being heard. 

The digital ID is paired with legislation previously passed through this parliament that allows government and business to scan everyday Australians’ faces in real time as we go about our business. The legislation that One Nation opposed yet the Senate passed allows police and any bureaucrat associated with penalties to determine your identity through a facial scan taken using your computer, your phone, your traffic cam, your street or shopping centre camera—even at supermarkets, which these days have more cameras than staff. The result is each Australian’s data history, which corporations are allowed to access. They will know everything about each of us, and this information will be traded to corporations and between corporations to build an even more detailed picture. Who is to blame for these tools of tyranny? Labor, the Greens, teal Senator Pocock and the globalist Liberals and Nationals. One Nation tried to pass an amendment to prevent this type of facial scanning yet the establishment parties voted our amendment down and out. They know this legislation’s real purpose is to extinguish populism so government can rule with total control. 

It was chilling last week to hear Treasurer Jim Chalmers, who graced business leaders with his thoughts on our future economy. The Treasurer believes Australia must become an ‘anti-fragile nation’ and invoked the philosophy of Nassim Nicholas Taleb—that strength and resilience emerge from confronting stress and disorder. The Treasurer said, ‘It is hard not to see the value in this idea.’ What may appear as a Treasurer trying to impress the big end of town with his pseudo-intellectual ‘wafflenomics’ on the nature of randomness is much, much more. The ‘non-fragile’ in that conversation means nothing the public can do, nothing the next ‘plandemic’ can do, will shape the total control held in the hands of government and their big business mates, the corporations. Nothing can and nothing will interfere with the flow of profit from everyday Australians into the pockets of the world’s predatory globalist billionaires. 

The Treasurer said ‘strength comes from confronting stress and disorder,’ which is a tenant of Communist political theory. To build a new world order one must first create chaos from which the public will beg to be rescued—climate fraud and fear, COVID panic and hysteria. We now see chaos in the housing market, in the food and cost-of-living crisis, in the hospital and medical crisis, in education and across social issues like the capture of language, and the erasure of women and gender. The Treasurer’s words were a frightening self-own. 

The government are not interested in solutions. They want chaos, to force the public to accept a loss of sovereignty and freedom in return for income, housing and false security. Many Australians are waking. Those who aren’t waking are running out of time. All that is needed to complete the suppression of opposition to this new tyranny is the misinformation and disinformation censorship bill that Minister Gallagher introduced. Free speech is the one thing preventing their plan from being complete, and the misinformation and disinformation censorship bill destroys speech.  

One Nation, being a proudly populist party will stick up for everyday Australians and oppose this control agenda. There is still hope. The internet is changing the ground rules, which is why they seek to control it. There is still time to sever the umbilical cord between the World Economic Forum and our parliament. Senator Hanson was right when she said last week ‘stop voting for parties that are deliberately making your lives harder. Stop voting for the Liberal and Labor uniparty. In the next election you have a choice: One Nation or tyranny. 

/4 Comments/by