In a rare win, the World Health Organisation has backed down on proposed International Health Regulation amendments for compulsory vaccination and lockdowns. It is a win yet the pandemic treaty, that would do the same thing again, is still waiting in the wings.

Transcript

This week represents a rare victory for Australian sovereignty.

A victory for common sense, decency and humanity.

And a victory against the sprawling monster of unelected, unaccountable foreign bureaucrats at the World Health Organisation.

You will recall the WHO proposed to change their health regulations that guide member states in the event of a disease outbreak, like COVID, from guiding member states to being mandatory on member states, including Australia.

This would have represented a complete destruction of Australian sovereignty, and a fundamental re-imagining of the powers of the World Health Organisation.

Last December the Liberal/National Morrison Government voted in favour of these changes, yet many sensible countries voted against, and the proposal was lost.

Undaunted the World Health Organisation tried again this year.

After months of heavy criticism, One Nation and those opposing these measures have had a big win.

The Final Report from the International Health Regulations Review Committee released this week has dropped the proposed changes.

The World Health Organisation will remain an advisory body.

Dystopian demands, such as allowing the World Health Organisation to make binding health orders overriding state and federal control, have been thrown out.

This includes the proposed powers that would have allowed the WHO to control:

  • systems for proof-of-vaccination or vaccination status,
  • quarantine procedures,
  • citizen travel & mobility,
  • forced vaccination,
  • lockouts,
  • lockdowns,
  • mandatory detention and,
  • other unacceptable infringements on people.

Gone is the universal ‘health passport’ – or vaccine passport – that was going to control the ability of citizens to travel between countries in a permanent capacity.

It was decided that this would raise ‘ethical’ and ‘discriminatory’ concerns. A global digital vaccine passport will no longer be developed under the committee’s powers.

For now.

The committee will remain confined to actual public health emergencies rather than ‘potential health risks’ – removing the widely held fear that their scope could be extended to ‘climate lockdowns’ and other human rights abuses.

Which would have been possible because WHO had proposed to remove human rights from the regulations.

After a backlash the committee now strongly recommends the retention of the existing text, which is quote “full respect for the dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms of persons as an overarching principle”.

This is a critical back down.

The WHO committee working on these changes has just recommitted to its fundamental human rights pledge in defiance of the proposed amendments.

The findings of the committee agreed with the concerns that One Nation raised regarding threat to sovereignty.

In their final report, the committee said that it was, quote: “concerned that the proposals may unduly impinge on the sovereignty of state parties” and make recommendations “binding” instead of voluntary.

In the end, the committee validated the fears raised on the international stage and within the free press.

Fears I raised and for which I was called a conspiracy theorist.

I was correct.

Their decision to throw out this attempt to grab power from sovereign governments  is a crucial first step in stopping unelected global bureaucracies from overstepping their purpose.

Pauline Hanson first raised the UN’s treasonous work in parliament in 1996. In my first senate speech in 2016 I called for Australia to exit the UN – AusEXIT.

We’ve been so strongly outspoken against ceding Australian sovereignty to the unhinged UN-WEF alliance that the WEF recently specifically called us out.

We’re getting under their skin.

This fight is not over.

All of the terrifying proposed powers that have been summarily rejected this week, are duplicated in the proposed WHO Pandemic Treaty.

The Pandemic Treaty is a second attempt to turn WHO into the world health police.

The Pandemic Treaty is alive and well, sitting in the system waiting for our “leaders” to signed.

If the Pandemic Treaty were to be approved, it would enforce all of the binding health powers that others in WHO have just rejected. What a mess.

The World Health Organisation is too big, too bureaucratic, too removed from the people it is supposed to help, corrupt, incompetent, dishonest and above all else, too close to the Pharmaceutical industry.

The next step to protect Australia’s health sovereignty is to make sure that the Pandemic Treaty is rejected and that the Prime Minister does not sign it.

For concerned Australians who have written to their members of parliament and who received a stock reply saying the treaty has to go through Parliament first – that is actually not true.

The WHO Pandemic Treaty includes a provision that it becomes binding on Australia the moment our WHO representative signs it.

No Parliamentary oversight required.

Screw that.

One Nation’s work continues.

27 replies
  1. Duane milled
    Duane milled says:

    Great now let’s bring back the constitution and have all parliament members sworn in properly and get rid of the ones that helped kill Australia

    • Edgardo
      Edgardo says:

      Great! Make all who agreed with WHO pay for it by going to jail!! Government officials have to serve their citizens who voted for them and not serve dictators from overseas!

  2. Nathalie
    Nathalie says:

    This vital information must be given to ALL AUSTRALIANS. Therefore I’m suggesting that One Nation retrieves all Australian Local,State and Federal electors email address or residential address and send in layman’s language of what’s about to take place and guide the people on how to protect themselves and all Australians. You have the means and access to do this. It’s inexpensive.

  3. Lee Smith
    Lee Smith says:

    The South Island of New Zealand was first seen by the Waitaha seers as a boat covered in rainbows. Other stuff provides further evidence it is the Ark of the Covenant.

    Problem is that the Maori cannibal vampire black magic religion inverted it’s direction, and still does, after genociding the entire civilisation that lived in New Zealand for some 1200 years.

    So a realistic version of a great reset would need this to be sorted out

  4. Lee Murison
    Lee Murison says:

    Thank you for all the courageous effort Malcom , Can you confirm or clarify just what this means a little more as it seems a little unambiguous and I couldn’t find anything regarding it on who website perhaps too new ?
    Kind regards
    Lee Murison

    • Kali
      Kali says:

      Brian, i suggest you look up James Roguski’s Substack, you’ll find all the despicable details outlined there.
      The reason your not able to find any statements on the W.H.O. site regarding their proposed “one medical” power grab, is because these meetings regarding it have been deemed “secret” in that they are not consulting with the public (They briefly did back in 2021, and didn’t like the response they got!), which as a PRIVATELY owned company, the W.H.O. is not legally required to publish their meetings.

    • Warren Hart
      Warren Hart says:

      It is stated in Article 35 of the proposal.
      Actually when all this started and “Dr” Tedros was “elected” to top spot in the WHO, I remember seeing a few YouTube video’s showing his background as a terrorist back in his own country… if I recall correctly, it may have been on https://www.youtube.com/@Facts Matter with Roman Balmakov
      Anything negotiated with a terrorist should be null and void!

  5. Renée
    Renée says:

    Why are none of these important issues sent to referendum?
    Isn’t the government supposed to represent OUR wishes? (ha!)
    I can’t even think when the last referendum was, and yet years ago, they seemed to happen all the time.
    No choice. No debates.
    It’s a mess all right.
    Great work, Malcolm. Yours is one of the very few voices of reason up there.

  6. Kali
    Kali says:

    Thank you for all that you are doing Senator Roberts, from the bottom of my heart.
    If this goes through then global slavery will be enacted.
    Please direct people to James Roguski’s Substack for any and all information about this pandemic treaty, amendments and W.H.O illegal power grab. He is the most comprehensive informer of this matter and breaks it down to plain speaking and allows readers to get involved in making sure the entire world knows what is being attempted, right under their noses.
    #stopthewho #wearemany #wewillnotforget

  7. michel rousseau
    michel rousseau says:

    Thanks Malcolm Roberts
    for fight for Australia against the demon that is there now ruling the world.
    Go back to God is urgent needed today, because the demon wants to destroy only the creation of God. Amén.
    Michel Rousseau.
    Olympic Champion 1956 – Melbourne – Australia –
    French- australian citizen

  8. Matthew
    Matthew says:

    This message goes to all the Government in this country. I do not consent to any of your rules or any of the W.H.O, any of these so called elites or any other form of group or individuals that goes against our sovereignty, any weapons including but not limited to bio weapons, chem trails anything that is designed to kill us or harm us in any way I do not consent. I do thank the ones who are fighting for us keep up the fight we will win

  9. Jussy Kaye
    Jussy Kaye says:

    Omg! Who decided that Australia was to be governed by these overseas groups? I do not remember giving my consent or voting any of them in as a representative for me or my country .. HOW can this be happening and WHY dont Aussies know about it?

  10. Tonz (Anthony) ROWING
    Tonz (Anthony) ROWING says:

    Thank you for the help so far to keep Australia run by Australians and not overseas bodies. We have to maintain our sovereignty and our borders

  11. Cynthia Lomas
    Cynthia Lomas says:

    Until MPs of all colours realise that we,the people , are their employers we will continue to have these power grabs from unelected bodies and their globalist agendas. Most politicians do not listen or even reply to constituents’ queries and reasonable worries. As we have teenage grandchildren we are anxious that their lives are not potentially put in thrall to these globalist would be dictators by our ignoring such moves now. And so we wrote of our concerns re the WHO to our local MP,John Gardner,Morialta SA, the leader of the opposition,P Dutton and received meaningless generic replies. Our federal member,James Stevens after much prodding did reply but his answer was unbelievable in its ignorance of what is occurring. Here it is :-“There is currently no legislation before parliament to adopt any measures proposed by the WHO”. This is probably true but if One Nation know what is proposed why don’t others similarly supposed to be representing us inform themselves? Not being satisfied with this reply we wrote again. Reply :-“As you would understand,I wanted to be informed on the substance of the WHO’s activities before I commented again”. We then sent a reading list suggesting he did some research. To be fair at least he is reading and replying and thanked us for the literature suggestions. Still not satisfied and by now knowing you and the party had already had one positive but not concluding result we wrote yet again to receive this reply:-“As I have previously stated there is no proposal before the parliament on this matter”. Surely any critical thinker in a position of trust would have sought out more information rather than relying on prosaic information from presumably government bureaucrats.
    We have not given up and have written once more suggesting that if one party can be active and get results why are we not properly served by those we elected. All power to your arm Malcolm. I did not intend to become an activist in my 80s but we have to stand firmly against not only these maniacal globalists but our weak and on the whole inept politicians. Thank you again for the work you do as ,having written dozens of letters, I respect the time and effort you and others of your ilk including Alex Antic and Pauline Hanson,expend to try to ensure our safety. Sincerely Cynthia and Brian

  12. Connie Brown
    Connie Brown says:

    Hi to all the strong people in Australia, I’m from Northern Ireland and it was so good to listen to this man speak, and more importantly, his message getting out to not only the citizens of Australia but the world! We will, worldwide, defeat these evil evil entities when we all stick together and stand strong!

  13. Linda
    Linda says:

    Hi Malcolm
    I have to correct you.
    All countries that have signed up to the WHO would have to abide by any change in its legislation.
    The WHO does not need any leader of a country.to sign any document.
    The WHO can change the legislation and its done.
    The only way to remove this threat is to get out of the WHO.

  14. Peter
    Peter says:

    So an act of terrorism is an act or threat that is intended to advance a political, ideological or religious cause or coerce or intimidate an Australian or foreign government or the public, and if that is the case, then why aren’t, politicians, public servants, business leaders, and generally any person doing the biding for the WHO, WEF and other similar organisations, bought before the courts on charges of terrorism

Comments are closed.