Senator is there anywhere we can find what One Nation list what ‘Australian National Identity’ is?

He reminds me of Mr Burns but instead of making money through a nuclear power plant he makes his money through the taxpayer.

A dog whistle interpreter ( applying the reasonableness test) would denote some supremacy.

Very well said and great policies.

Great statement Senator Malcolm Roberts once again .

Well said Senator Roberts

Voting record says otherwise.

I've got to wonder how many skilled people are being refused to allow for families of unskilled.

Well said one nation

Agreed 💯

One Nation puts wealthy billionaires first!

Who's national identity?? As a sixth generation Aussie I love multicultural Australia.

Could you define what assimilation means for you, Senator Malcolm Roberts? Thanks in advance. I mean, what does it look like on a daily basis in terms of clothes, language, food, customs, religious practice, those kind of things? The word itself often has dark connotations in fiction, such as the famously ironic line in Star Trek by the Borg: “Prepare to be assimilated. We will add your uniqueness to our own. Resistance is futile.”

Malcom Roberts was a British citizen for 61 years.

But if you want to ban non-citizens from buying homes in Australia and stop skilled migrants applying for citizenship for at least 8 years, what skilled migrant in their right mind would want to come to Australia? My nephew (a skilled and qualified mechanic), wants to migrate to Australia. He owns his own home in the UK, which he'd have to sell before coming here. Can you clarify, would One Nation's policies force him to rent for at least 9 years & force him out of the housing market (given the time citizenship applications take)? That's insane if correct.

Tom Pascoe why? Do you realise Senator Malcolm Roberts is A migrant?

There's a country Pauline puts ahead of Australia

YES PLEASE

The LNP protect the borders

You e succeeded. Mass migration has never occurred and you stopped it.

Good on you Malcolm💜🇦🇺

You answered the questions well Senator Malcolm Roberts, thank you

A disgrace to our political scene

So if i have got this right, if a billion dollar company wants yo sell us an orange and make it mandatory through our paid for politicians, our regulators rely on the information supplied by the billion dollar company to confirm its safety...... fk that sounds like it would work

I hear this a lot: Child n1 fully vaccinated = always sick with some kind of allergy Child n2 partially vaccinated = less sick and less allergies compared to child n1. Child 3 not vaccinated = never or almost never gets sick and no allergies

Music to my ears. The chairs scraping, the papers shuffled, the rats running and skidding to the exits.

One of the truly best comics of our generation - thank you Malcolm Roberts, you are without a doubt, great commodity relief in this divisive world - ohhhh wait, you are part of the problem & not part of the solution, me bad, sorry 😔

Those answers fill you with confidence, don't they. Pfizer comes along "hey Australia we have a vaccine for you". TGA "Have you done any testing" "We sure have" TGA "How'd it go?" "Yeh good" TGA "We'll take it"

Their responses were logical and highlighted the stringent processes Australia follows before vaccines are approved here. If you can’t understand the science, don’t blame the messenger.

My husband's batch was not tested when it came into Australia

Here's some evidence. Polio doesn't exist anymore due to vaccines.

So gives grounds for a compansation

They did not supply sufficient evidence.

How much are these people paid? They should have a days pay taken off every time they say "I will take this on notice" 😵‍💫😵‍💫😵‍💫

The cookers cooker

Ask for the studies & data for them then ?

They have never been tested any where 😡☠️

I really don't know whether to laugh or cry 😕 (Retired Registered Nurse with 40 years experience)

Follow the data that's the most scariest word

It's very pathetic that we now live in a society that cares not about the dignity of the human person, but, rather prioritises gain over life. Worst of all is that the perpetrators normally do not have a feeling of restraint, knowing full well that they are destroying human lives. We cannot but ask: Are these really human beings?

It is remarkable how Malcom Roberts manages individuals who appear to be authoritarian. It seemed responses to the questions by all the team, particularly “The Professor” were unnecessarily lengthy, confusing, and somewhat defensive. I questioned if Malcolm Roberts was convinced of the accuracy of their responses. Were the responses purposely overwhelming?

I’m sure a new shiny plane will help

Get in a car , go on a bushwalk and you could die. Risk vs Benefit analysis. Everything we do is risk vs benefit analysis. Millions died from COVID. It was real.

Professional dribblers.

“We rely on evidence and data” …but in reality ignore all evidence and data! 📊 🙄😒

1) Randomised clinical trials (initial proof) Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine trial * ~43,000 participants * ~95% efficacy against symptomatic COVID-19 (pre-Delta variants) * Near-complete protection against severe disease in the trial period Moderna COVID-19 vaccine trial * ~30,000 participants * ~94% efficacy against symptomatic infection * Strong protection against severe disease 👉 These trials established that the vaccines work under controlled conditions. ⸻ 2) Real-world effectiveness studies (millions of people) Public Health England vaccine effectiveness study * Showed strong protection against hospitalisation and death * Even with Delta variant, protection against severe outcomes remained high CDC COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness network study * Unvaccinated adults were ~10–20× more likely to be hospitalised than vaccinated * Protection strongest shortly after vaccination, waning over time but restored with boosters ⸻ 3) Large population cohort studies Israeli nationwide COVID-19 vaccine study * ~1.2 million people matched vaccinated vs unvaccinated * ~92% effectiveness against severe disease * ~94% against hospitalisation This study is widely cited because Israel rolled out vaccines early and tracked outcomes carefully. ⸻ 4) Reduction in death rates Office for National Statistics * Death rates consistently much higher in unvaccinated groups across age bands * Vaccinated individuals had substantially lower risk of dying from COVID ⸻ 5) Global impact modelling Global impact of the first year of COVID-19 vaccination * Estimated ~14–20 million deaths prevented worldwide in the first year of vaccination * Based on excess mortality data across many countries ⸻ 6) Booster dose benefits CDC booster effectiveness study * Boosters restored protection against severe disease * Particularly important for older adults and vulnerable groups ⸻ What “benefit” actually means in practice Across all this evidence, the consistent findings are: * Much lower risk of hospitalisation * Much lower risk of ICU admission * Much lower risk of death * Some reduction in infection and transmission (stronger early on, less so with newer variants) Even when protection against infection drops with new variants, protection against severe outcomes remains the key benefit.

Cookers gonna cook….

Puppets