Absolute muppets the entire Labour Party.

I am sure the towels are washed in organic detergent

Surprised it only cost that much. He needs to get some lessons from Anika Wells and have a real crack with our money. Oh sorry it’s not our money they have already spent that so it goes on the credit card.

“𝘖𝘶𝘳 𝘣𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘌𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘢 𝘣𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘺. 𝘐𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘌𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘯 𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘸𝘦 𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦; 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘧𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸. 𝘙𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘵𝘩 𝘪𝘴 𝘷𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘭, 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘴 𝘢 𝘭𝘶𝘹𝘶𝘳𝘺. 𝘐𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘞𝘩𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘥, 𝘪𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘣𝘦 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘶𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘵𝘰 𝘧𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦 𝘣𝘺 𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩, 𝘍𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘩 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘎𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘴, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘮𝘶𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯.” — 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗵, 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘱𝘶𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘙𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘋𝘪𝘨𝘦𝘴𝘵, 𝘖𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘣𝘦𝘳 1939. 𝘙𝘦𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘞𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘑𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘊𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘈. 𝘓𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘩, (𝘕𝘦𝘸 𝘠𝘰𝘳𝘬: 𝘏𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵 𝘉𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘑𝘰𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘰𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘩, 1970). #EuropeanHeritage #Race #RacialPreservation

Really hope that he put his hand in his deep pockets instead of ours. He can always ask Pratt and Ziggi to fork the tab, but he won’t.

Lov in

Serious question. Who has financial delegation to approve this expenditure?? Is it Bowen or some highly paid bureaucrat.

They should be made to ask permission because that is NOT their money. THATS MY FUNKING MONEY!

They deserve it, because they are better than us

And they go off about Pauline having a holiday

Totally corrupt like the rest of the WEF puppets , funny there’s no problem with the monstrosities that are data centres that are total pollutants , that doesn’t seem to bother the climate alarmists . Just shows it’s a total con. I bet they’re not brought up in the climate conference eh

🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

The peanut 🥜 blackout Bowen always seems to amaze me 🌚🕶whats next?

We could heat all the poor pensioners houses for that!

Labor are a farking joke!!!

And come back with a bit more of the plan ?

And everyone’s on the bandwagon about Pauline having a little private break in Italy which was not even on the taxpayers money. 🤦‍♀️.

Cause he hasn't wasted enough money to date 🥴

Malcolm, it is a balancing act and they have made real progress. Germanys Energy Mix I have formed by view from reading and a long conversation with a German engineering teacher here on holidays. Germany has large reserves of coal with a significant amount close to the surface, it has not been mined because it is surface coal below fertile soil and important food growing areas, a lot of their coal is brown coal which is the dirtiest burning coal, they have stopped using nuclear because of high costs and safety concerns, they get water from the snow melt in Switzerland and the snow depth is decreasing by about 8 cm a decade, nuclear needs a lot of water. It is a complicated situation but it will be interesting as they tackle many different energy mixes. I hope you get to eat your words.

Who knew!

“𝘖𝘶𝘳 𝘣𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘌𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘢 𝘣𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘺. 𝘐𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘌𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘯 𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘸𝘦 𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦; 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘧𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸. 𝘙𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘵𝘩 𝘪𝘴 𝘷𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘭, 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘴 𝘢 𝘭𝘶𝘹𝘶𝘳𝘺. 𝘐𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘞𝘩𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘥, 𝘪𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘣𝘦 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘶𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘵𝘰 𝘧𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦 𝘣𝘺 𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩, 𝘍𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘩 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘎𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘴, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘮𝘶𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯.” — 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗵, 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘱𝘶𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘙𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘋𝘪𝘨𝘦𝘴𝘵, 𝘖𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘣𝘦𝘳 1939. 𝘙𝘦𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘞𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘑𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘊𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘈. 𝘓𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘩, (𝘕𝘦𝘸 𝘠𝘰𝘳𝘬: 𝘏𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵 𝘉𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘑𝘰𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘰𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘩, 1970). #EuropeanHeritage #Race #RacialPreservation

The government should hand out butt plugs before making you bend over...

We knew eventually we would be proven correct because we grounded our position with real world data and simple logic. Whereas the others have relied on majorly flawed studies and ideology.

Maybe look it up before you make comments🤦‍♂️ so they have had an overload to their grid because so many people are using private owned systems and putting power into the grid is bottlenecked it and causing negative power prices. So they arent cutting funding because it failed, but because it worked to well

100% true

Yeah because they spent the money they have the infrastructure to be able to do that now.

Save the money, slash welfare and taxes should be the motto.

OMG, quoting Electroverse 😆

🤡

Yet Malcolm the Germans are still buying ev's

Better the profits of the millionaires and fossil fuel industries aren't threatened than the continued survival of the species... 👍

Malcolm hope you have your foil hat on ….. Malcolm’s sharing screenshots again. Must be exhausting keeping up with all the conspiracies — climate scientists, the UN, renewable energy, and now Germany’s budget. At this point the only thing he hasn’t blamed is the lizard people.

Of course one nation is planning to move back to mined power sources, they’re funded by a billionaire mining magnate

Pleased with yourself Malcom ? Now post the rest

ABC Foreign Correspondent 8.30 tonight. Watch that and tell me how any of One Notion's policies are going to help Australia compete with what China is doing.

He needs the money to rearm for his masters planned war with Russia. Slow learners these Germans.

Hahahaha, when wearing a tin foil hat is not enough you go to 'Electroverse' for information. Electroverse is widely known as a quackery level Pseudoscience source based on the promotion of misinformation regarding climate change that does not align with the consensus of science

The Germans have also cut themselves off from cheap Russian energy. By order of the Americans, and now VW is going bust.

Senator Roberts — or anyone who supports this position — can you explain, in a meaningful and good-faith way, what you believe the long-term plan actually is? I understand the immediate argument being made here: coal is cheaper, net zero is costly, and the transition may increase electricity prices. But I’m trying to understand what comes after that. If climate change is exaggerated or fundamentally wrong, and we continue relying heavily on fossil fuels, what does Australia look like in 10, 20 or 50 years? And more importantly, what is the contingency plan if the scientific consensus is broadly right? At best, we could face severe disruption to food production, water security, infrastructure, insurance, public health and the economy. At worst, we could see cascading instability across our region: failed harvests, displacement, conflict over resources, fragile states collapsing and increasing pressure on borders, trade and national security. Australia does not exist in isolation. If neighbouring countries become less habitable, lose food and water security or suffer repeated disasters, what happens then? Do we close the borders and watch? Do we accept large numbers of displaced people? Do we intervene militarily? Do we spend vastly more responding to crises that may have been cheaper to mitigate? This is where “Australia First” politics seems to run into a contradiction. You cannot meaningfully put Australia first while ignoring risks that could destabilise our region, economy, food systems and security. The conservative instinct is supposed to value prudence, stability, responsibility and protecting what we inherit for the next generation. So why is the conservative response here to gamble that nearly every major scientific institution is wrong? This is not about panic, and it is not about accepting every climate policy without scrutiny. It is basic risk management. If the science is overstating the danger, we may invest earlier than necessary in cleaner energy, resilient infrastructure and more efficient use of resources. If the science is broadly right and we do too little, the cost could be almost unimaginably greater. So I am genuinely asking: what is the complete long-term vision? Not just “stop net zero”. What happens next, and what is the plan if you are wrong?

The UN climate change drivel was always a fraud. The world has never debated the Co2 and its affects. That is the first thing I would do but I do not have the means to Marshall the two sides of the science debate (no politicians), funny nobody in our nation has done that, just accepted the UN drivel on spec.

Malcolm, Germany has not “ended net zero.” Its official 2027 budget says investment through its Infrastructure and Climate Neutrality Fund will increase by 60%, while the Climate and Transformation Fund is still expected to spend about €40.3 billion. Germany is cutting some uncommitted programs and redirecting part of the money toward grid charges and industrial electricity relief. That is a budget adjustment inside the energy transition—not its abandonment. Calling a reshuffle of climate spending “Germany adopting One Nation policy” is not economic analysis. It is a false headline built from a screenshot.

The wacko selectively picking things he can object to without the full exacts.

What Rubbish, Russia blowing up the pipeline is what drove Germany electricity rates as renewable energy transition was working.

Aiden is a researcher at the Centre for Independent Studies, a think tank that has reportedly received funding from companies including BHP and Shell. That’s worth keeping in mind when considering the perspective being presented.

Renewables are renewable. Coal can only be burnt once.

Why is that mature+Nuclear line the highest?

Wholesale electricity prices in Australia's National Energy Market, averaged over the last 12 months. You can check these for yourself, by going to the OpenNEM webpage. Percentages are the contribution to electricity use in Australia, wholesale prices in dollars per megawatt hour. As of 18th July 2026: Solar 22.2%, $27.79 Wind 16.4%, $52.57 Coal 50.0% $76.27 Hydro 6.1% $100.36 Battery Discharging 1.4%, $120.69 Gas 3.7%, $147.42

What makes Aidan Morrison an “energy expert”?

Let me sum this up for you. CSIRO/AEMO models the grid for planning, Morrison models the grid for argumentation.

‘expert’

Nice editing out the context at the bottom.

Malcolm you're summation only works if the CSIRO is in on a conspiracy. Funny that.

meanwhile in the real world, the Australian Energy Regulator is reducing the the minimum default offer for the next period (which governs electricity prices) accross most of the country thanks to the cheaper power produced from renewable sources

Aiden likes coal, right?

Simple physics tells us that swapping the most dense form of creating energy for the least dense form of creating energy must be totally inefficient in every way including economically and environmentally.

Matthew Imagine if cost was the only factor that determined if something was a good idea. Malcolm engaged all his brain power for this post. 😂

Dear Malcolm. Climate Change is a reality. Coal is not an option. Mitigation is a necessity.

Yet, wholesale prices have reduced 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Don’t trust the numbers game they can massage them the same way as they can get the required results from the CSIRO ☹️✌️

Yeah a fire in a rock cave - way cheaper.

Gaslights Get em here Clydesdale Studs Whale Oil Lamps They’re the future 😵‍💫

Malcolm uses a GenCost report as “evidence” and states in the same post: “GenCost reports are largely fraudulent”. Which one is it mate?

It’s not about who the person is making the post, but what does the data actually say. The CSIRO has conceded that its previous costings did not look at transmission and other factors.

The CSIRO chart actually shows the exact opposite of the tweet's claim. While achieving deeper emission cuts increases overall grid integration costs across the board, a system built on mature renewables remains the most cost-effective way to get there compared to introducing CCS or nuclear power.

Mr Neuron likes X for his facts... renewables are what it's says renewable but coal and Diesel are not ,just like the earths not flat

CSIRO argues that this doesn't mean abandoning net zero is cheaper overall because: ageing coal stations still have to be replaced; building new coal plants is also expensive; if electricity emits more carbon, emissions reductions have to occur elsewhere in the economy, where they are often more costly.