ONE NATION ALL THE WAY 🧡🧡🇦🇺🇦🇺 We need to stick together to save our Country from this Government...

While some Northern areas get high monsoon rains, that isn't the case further south. Dry spells have been persistent.

I bet this is riverting 2 hours filled with facts 🙄

Every business revolves around energy expenditure...thus making everything more expensive...!

Who says leprechauns don't exist!?!

Renewables, the cheapest form of power generation. The Energy is free.

Santos is facing intense scrutiny over the allocation of gas to the domestic market following the release of the Australian Government's draft Domestic Gas Reservation Scheme. The federal policy requires liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporters to set aside 20 per cent of their output for local consumers, directly impacting Santos' fully contracted Gladstone LNG (GLNG) project in Queensland

Some of us dont have much of those things

We had something childhood its no longer what children have theyre imprisoned

This is why Australia 🇦🇺 should and will become a monoculture This is a true fact by Author Mark Lopez The origins of multiculturalism in australian politics Multiculturalism in Australian politics originated as a pragmatic response to the social and educational struggles of post-World War II migrants. Over time, it was championed as an official government policy during the Whitlam and Fraser eras in the 1970s, but has since evolved into an ongoing, highly polarizing ideology. Multiculturalism remains a deeply polarizing force in Australian politics. Proponents argue it is essential for social cohesion in a nation where over half the population was born overseas or has at least one immigrant parent. However, the policy fosters fragmentation, identity politics, and undermines a unified national identity.The origins and ongoing division surrounding the policy highlight contrasting visions for the country's social fabric.

FARMER DECIDES WHAT GOES ON THEIR LAND NOT ONE (racist) NATION There seems to be a persistent scare narrative forming that the government is secretly preparing to smother Australian farmland beneath an unbroken sheet of solar panels. One moment you’re checking the paddock. The next, Canberra has arrived with 14 million electricians and converted the entire wheat belt into a charging station. It makes for a powerful image. It just does not survive contact with scale. Australia has roughly 439 million hectares of agricultural land. Using the footprint and electricity output of major Australian solar projects, replacing the annual electricity currently generated by coal with utility-scale solar would require somewhere in the broad vicinity of 130,000 hectares. That sounds enormous until it is compared with 439 million hectares. It is roughly 0.03%. Around three hectares for every 10,000 hectares of agricultural land. And even that is a deliberately exaggerated comparison, because nobody is proposing that coal be replaced entirely by utility-scale solar. Australia’s energy system is being replaced by a mix of rooftop solar on millions of homes and businesses. Wind farms. Utility-scale solar. Hydro. Batteries and other storage. Transmission. Gas and other dispatchable generation during the transition. Demand management and improved efficiency. A considerable share of future solar generation will therefore use rooftops, industrial land, car parks and already-developed spaces rather than productive farmland. Some solar sites can also continue supporting agriculture. Sheep can graze beneath and between panels. Land can provide both electricity and agricultural production through agrivoltaic systems. Solar development does not automatically mean the land has been fired into the sun and removed permanently from the Australian continent. None of this means land-use concerns should be dismissed. They should not. There are legitimate questions about whether high-quality agricultural land should be protected. How projects affect neighbouring properties. Consultation with regional communities. Biodiversity and vegetation clearing. Bushfire planning. Waterways and soil. Visual impacts. Transmission corridors. Lease terms. Decommissioning obligations. Waste and recycling at the end of a project’s life. And whether host communities receive a fair share of the benefits. Those are real planning questions that deserve serious answers. But they are badly served by pretending renewable energy requires the industrialisation of every paddock from Mildura to Townsville. The total national footprint is small. The local footprint can still matter enormously. Both statements can be true. A project consuming a tiny fraction of Australia’s farmland may still be poorly located, badly consulted or unfair to the people living beside it. That is why individual developments should be assessed carefully. But “this particular project may be inappropriate here” is a very different argument from “renewables are coming for Australian agriculture.” The first is planning. The second is a scare campaign wearing an Akubra. Australian farming is not about to disappear beneath solar panels. We have enough land to produce food, generate electricity and protect important environments. The challenge is choosing suitable sites, consulting properly and ensuring regional communities are treated as participants rather than scenery. That requires competent planning. Fortunately, it does not require hiding the tractor before Canberra spots it. Credit: The Gherk

www.instagram.com/reel/DZ4DCIjucPE/?igsh=MTJqNTBjazRtbWNvZg==

Winning. Still winning. Two party preferred as well, has Labor 51 to One Nation 49. If an election was held today, it would be too close to call. Bring on 2028. One Nation is the only party STILL trending up since the last election. Let that sink in for a minute. #FiretheLiar

So how would have you stopped Russia attacking Ukraine and the USA/Israil attacking Iran?

it dosnt need an isreal arms base