Malcolm the MAN

You forgot labor’s spending 😁 (Albeit which is driving inflation)

Aged paid it all their working life especially those that owned small businesses

Who made the speech for you? Chat GBT or google Ai?

Tax the gas buddy

This will see people giving up on private health care and going on to the already overwhelmed public system.

Yes exactly Malcolm all this Penny pinching by the government when it comes to private health insurance for over 65s will only result in many people who can’t afford to pay more for private health cover as they don’t have a big salary cut their private health insurance altogether and rely on the public system which is already under immense pressure .

And cut pregnancy benefits for men

I love how this guy thinks . 😊👍🏼

It is reducing, not removing

They are not removing it they are making it consistent across all ages. The government announced this measure in the Federal Budget, stating that age should not dictate the level of financial subsidy a household receives

Nice to see an Australian making sense.

No government is going to magically fix Australia, especially labour or one nation. In my view, this isn’t just a problem of one party, one politician, or even one country. Across much of the world we’ve watched political leaders, corporations, lobbyists and financial interests accumulate enormous wealth and influence while ordinary people struggle with housing, inflation, healthcare and the rising cost of living. The issue isn’t simply who is in power. It’s the system itself. We’ve built a culture that rewards endless accumulation, competition and short-term self-interest rather than cooperation, community and stewardship. I don’t think the answer is putting our faith in another politician. I think the long-term answer is creating systems that encourage fairness, accountability, local resilience and a willingness to share resources rather than endlessly hoard them. A society only works when people recognise that we’re all connected. When wealth, opportunity and power become concentrated in fewer and fewer hands, eventually the system starts breaking down for everyone.

For normal budget conscious people if they run out of money they just cut back on their spending but this government just looks at the Australian public and says “now who else can we rip off so we can continue to bleed them dry”

The government forgets that we didn't just take out private health when we turned 65. In our case I started it the year I started working 1974. Yes that's how long my family funded our own health care from. We could afford it - dual income. We chose to stay out of the public system to leave it to people who needed it. Now as aged pensioners we try to keep it up. We are no longer on top cover but we do get hospitals paid for although now with an excess. It has been a struggle but we did it so others could use the public system . Now as this government has seen fit to penalise us for that by removing the discount. Shame on the way they treat their elderly. They forget that one day that will be them . Only they won't be struggling to pay the bills on the age pension . They will have their government funded politicians pension. Won't affect them at all. This government is disgraceful. This week they have managed to lose the female vote and now older people. Great week Albo.

Senator Malcolm they don’t care for the elderly, they only care about confusing and controlling our young people’s minds and future. Love your honesty and stoicism in truth! Thank you 🙏 🧡🇦🇺

I'm 66 and have never had a 34% rebate on my health insurance. I used to get 30% until Howard cut it back to under 25%

Exactly and well presented. They just don’t care.

Nationalise the private healthcare system?

Once again, this only affects rich people of 65. ONE NATION once again advocating for the rich and wealthy Australians. Most of us would love to earn as much as the people this affects

How about we start taking perks and benefits off politicians 🤬🤬

We Voted for Senator Pauline Hanson and One Nation Party supported Australians and listened to the people for 30 years. We the people are awake now listening to Senator Pauline Hanson and One Nation Party ❤ excellent news

Does anyone else's ex complain that that the kids say the red coloured Leggo bricks dont taste like strawberries when mixed with custard?

Absolutely

Everyone over 65 will just leave their Health Insurance and let’s see how the dysfunctional public health system manages then!

Thankyou, Senator Malcolm Roberts for being a sane voice. Sadly, there doesn't seem to be too many logical reasonable voices these days.

Dribble dribble dribble, a lot of words that say nothing.

Who are those witches?

As a woman who has birthed 7 children 3 boys (now men) and 4 girls (now women) yes we women deserve safety and my sons will be the first to step up if they have to...... I have never birthed a they them and neither have my children my grandchildren are 3 males 3 females

They are not medical questions they are asking what is your perspective

Why can’t we just add the building codes that there needs to be 4 sets of toilets. Male, female, unisex, disabled and a parents room. Why can’t we give aistralians a choice on being who they want to be and allows those who feels safe to use a bathroom that desire. Why does it have to be an issue?

She didn’t answer the question.

Can men use the women toilets in parliament?

Concentrate your efforts on preventing DV.

Got to help with women's health. Free prostate examinations for all women over 50 🤣😂

State your position. It is easy enough.

what did I just watch 😳 Thankyou Senator Robert’s 👏

Is that a broken beer bottel around her neck😂😂😂😂😂😂

Look at their body language. Katy Gallagher is cross armed. And looks 😡

Women are already at high risk of violation without intervention. This is now inviting men to a smorgasbord.

Pass the buck, can't answer a question

Her first answer - so smug.

I think the gender debate has eroded individual rights. I get that a man who has undergone the prescribed requirements to define them as a woman under law is deemed as a woman under that law. l don’t have a problem with that, or them having equality in public spaces, but what l have a problem with is that people expected to go against their beliefs & values to suit a legal definition, despite their personal views. I’ll translate that to my home. If l go to the supermarket l have to accept all people are entitled to that forum, regardless. But I have a right to exlude people from my home that l don’t wish to be here, without having to justify my reasons. I believe a website/app that’s essentially a private domain should be able to set it’s own rules & requirements accordingly. However, there are various aspects in the case of GvT. One is that T registered based on the legal definition of ‘woman’, but it was against the rules of the site that stated one had to be a biological woman. They were on the site for about a year, interacting with women with no complaints, but an ‘audit’ saw G view T’s photo & deemed they weren’t a biological woman, so expelled them from the site. I believe that was their right. The conditions were laid out at the onset. Personally, having known transwomen, l don’t have a problem with believing transwomen have similar ‘experiences’ to cisgender women, & having them in my space is dependent on the person, not their ‘gender’. All this talk about biology ignores that essentially we are neither gender for the first part of our gestation, & the environment in the womb that can affect so much of our physiology can be extremely varied between individuals. I don’t give a shit who or what people are as long as we can respect & accept each other as individuals. ‘Don’t shit on me & we don’t have a problem.’ But, like l said, l have a problem with autonomy being eroded. Life can really suck. Life can be incredibly difficult. But we all have our cross to bear & bear it we must. Even if that cross is non acceptance in a certain arena. The one thing that blows my mind is pregnancy protection for transwomen.🤯 Transmen l could understand. There are those that retain their female reproductive organs so they can have a biological child. (I get it, but, man, l think it’s so wrong to fuck around with biology like that, to subject any soul /child to that kind of hormone cocktail.🤯) And it’s not protection in creating a family by surrogacy or adoption, it’s for pregnancy. In my time l’ve been maybe one of the greatest ‘civil libertarians’ of our time, been criticised & ‘condemned’ for it. But, ‘pregnancy’ protection for people unable to become pregnant? Seriously?

VOTE ONE NATION AND SAVE AUSTRALIA 🇦🇺

Is this woman for real. Maybe this politicians need to go and experience some of this at firsthand cause clearly they do not understand and they do not have the rights of biological women in their focus.

So this office for women is basically set up to protect women who are being held back by men. So when a woman doesn’t feel comfortable-and won’t- use a toilet because a biological male is in there, wouldn’t that be one of the reasons the office exists?

Great questions Malcolm. How can that lady say what does the term biological women mean? Is she for real. As far as I’m concerned it should be up to men to make sure men stay out of women’s private spaces this should be an issue for men to sort out if I see a man go into the same toilet as my granddaughter I will remove him

The rules of this game is never ever agree with anything that your opponent is asking, as that would be admitting defeat! It absolutely doesn't matter what the topic is. Common sense absolutely has no place in parliament arguments.

Good on you sir

How can women be safe it public places.?

The year is 1907, over one hundred years ago... Sir Edmund Barton's ideas on Immigrants and being an Australian in 1907. 'In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an Australian and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an Australian, and nothing but an Australian. There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an Australian, but something else also, isn't an Australian at all. We have room for but one flag, the Australian flag. We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language... and we have room for, but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the Australian people.'

Perhaps we need independent sovereignty as a country back?

Like most conspiracy theories, this one's missing several steps in the middle

Love your work Malcolm 💪💪💪🙏🙏🙏

Has Albo, Burke and Wong declared which mosque they attend yet?

We’d be in a much deeper mess without politicians like Malcolm Roberts. Thank you Malcolm Roberts God bless you Malcolm Roberts.

I meant that for Jacqui Stahl

Well said - what was the answer to that question ?

Case and point. What was the response?

You need to include the other relevant information: These visas form $0-50 per visa of the visa income people keep saying it contributes to (vs parent visas at $43,000 per adult, or skilled migrants at $4,000+) This entitles them to PR the second they touch down and thus - NDIS, centrelink, Medicare, 5% deposit, etc Also entitles them to citizenship They don't need to pass an English test like those of us who actually paid thousands for our visas 🌻

Quite agree - seriously these are the immigration standards that we are calling out - this is the policy that’s not comparable with western democracies, hell bent on formulating their own agenda via the UN which Albo subscribes to ..

Actually it is well documented that this it happening.

Well said Senator.

At last an opposition party who is roaring their dispute at the government “change of direction” The other opposition’s silence is deafening.

Whatever Malcom Roberts says is an expert informed guideline and opinion- My vote- Thank you 👍🏼💯

In Australia, “watchdog complaints” usually mean reporting suspected misconduct, corruption, abuse of power, maladministration, or unlawful behaviour to an oversight body that can investigate government agencies, politicians, police, or public servants. Which watchdog depends on the issue. Some major ones include: National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) Investigates serious or systemic corruption involving Commonwealth public officials. Australian Federal Police For alleged federal crimes. Commonwealth Ombudsman Complaints about unfair treatment or maladministration by federal government agencies. Australian Electoral Commission Electoral issues, donations, campaign matters. Office of the Australian Information Commissioner Privacy or FOI problems. In NSW specifically: Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) investigates corruption in NSW public administration. How complaints usually work: You submit information Usually through an online form, email, or written statement. You describe: what happened, who was involved, dates/times, evidence, witnesses, documents/links/screenshots. They assess jurisdiction The body decides: Is this actually within their powers? Is there enough information? Is it corruption/crime/maladministration? Should another agency handle it? A lot of complaints are redirected or closed at this stage. Possible investigation If serious enough, they may: gather records, interview witnesses, compel documents, hold hearings, refer matters to police or prosecutors. Outcome Possible outcomes: no action, recommendations, disciplinary action, policy changes, referral for criminal prosecution, public reports. Important practical reality: Watchdogs generally need specific evidence, not broad political dissatisfaction. “I think the government is ruining the country” usually won’t trigger an investigation. Concrete evidence works better: bribery, undeclared conflicts, unlawful contracts, misuse of public money, knowingly false statements, improper lobbying, corruption networks, etc. For example, a complaint saying: “Immigration is too high” is political opinion. Whereas: “Here are documents suggesting officials knowingly bypassed security screening in exchange for benefits” is the kind of thing a watchdog may examine. You can also contact MPs, Senate committees, journalists, or advocacy groups if your concern is more about policy than corruption.

Thank you Senator Robert’s for being the voice for Australian’s 🫡 🇦🇺

So much talk about what needs to be done SO LETS GET IT STARTED

Naveed was born in Australia from a former education visa holder not a refugee.his father was born in India like Malcolm was. Man Monis arrived on a tourist visa and granted asylum despite being on an Interpol warrant. He didn't arrive as a refugee. Both came under the Howard government. The USA, UK and Israel etc caused the crisis for the alawites when they supported Isis to toppled Assad in Syria. Which refugee camp are the Nigerian Christians or White South African located? Quite a few of the white south African have returned from the USA to South Africa . . As an FYI both Sheikh Shadi Alsuleiman and Wissam Haddad were born in Sydney, Australia.

Thank you Malcom, keep fighting for us.

Labor doesn’t care where it gets its votes from or what the cost will be.

Israel first?

Go Malcolm 🙏

Vote On and labor last and things will change

It's like taking a baby snake into your home, You feed it, give it food, and roof over it's head. In time the snake will grow, become more bigger and stronger, it will definitely bite you or eat you. You cannot blame the snake for it's in it's nature to do so, you have to blame yourself for taking it into your home in the first place.No matter how many times it sheds it's skin, it's always be a snake. The same same goes for humans, you cannot see the good in evil, otherwise in the end you will pay a heavy price, they cannot change themselves for it's in their nature and culture to be evil. -Grandpa.