The moment they mention “under the law”or “is entirely legal” or in the “legal framework”, it quickly translates into; They’ve spent a ton of money with lawyers exploring the very edges of the grey areas of the legal framework and formed their “policies” in those dark corners, definitely not in the good faith of the law, but a poofteenth of a maybe it’s legal and they’ll use even more taxpayer dollars to tie it up in court forever if they get caught out (While that is happening they’re getting their own way)

Yep and tariff only applies once a year now , redundant

Sounds like jobs for the boys.

The system ensures redundancy as it requires manufacturers to pay to maintain a products “currency”. When manufacturers launch new models they don’t continue to pay currency for the old models so they become non compliant - Powerwall 2 case in point

Rooftop solar is the new organised crime

Jobs for the boys. Competitive bidding, bullshit. Just so happens board members are also industry investors.

More importantly why are we tax payers funding Wuhan with electric/solar buses & boats?!!!

Jobs for mates

Labor corruption

Asia and agendas meanwhile China has coal fired plants everywhere and coal blast smelters and the country with the second most nuclear plants and we have none. Our growth in Industry is only for mining. That’s it fucking resource pit we have become

What a load of cods wollop

Labor’s Treasonous UnConstitutional green energy scam exposed siding with green renewable energy companies and ripping off the people of the Commonwealth of Australia.. www.facebook.com/share/v/1E3fNsLapf/

Sounds like another scam on the taxpayers.... Prosecute them all for fraud and Treason especially the politicians...... bureaucrats. The United Nations’ influential climate change committee has quietly discarded the dire temperature-rise scenarios used in two previous reports predicting horrific consequences of global warming - after the push wrought untold damage to the public psyche, economy and to our wallets. www.facebook.com/share/1CvrWii69j/

Malcomb must really feel like grabbing these knobs by the throat and telling them to simply answer the question. The government is criminal with its behavior.

CLIMATE SCAM. CANT WAIT TO SEE THE BACK OF THIS CORPORATE BULLSHIT ARTIST.

And cut pregnancy benefits for men

Malcolm the MAN

You forgot labor’s spending 😁 (Albeit which is driving inflation)

Aged paid it all their working life especially those that owned small businesses

This will see people giving up on private health care and going on to the already overwhelmed public system.

Who made the speech for you? Chat GBT or google Ai?

Tax the gas buddy

Yes exactly Malcolm all this Penny pinching by the government when it comes to private health insurance for over 65s will only result in many people who can’t afford to pay more for private health cover as they don’t have a big salary cut their private health insurance altogether and rely on the public system which is already under immense pressure .

For normal budget conscious people if they run out of money they just cut back on their spending but this government just looks at the Australian public and says “now who else can we rip off so we can continue to bleed them dry”

It is reducing, not removing

They are not removing it they are making it consistent across all ages. The government announced this measure in the Federal Budget, stating that age should not dictate the level of financial subsidy a household receives

I love how this guy thinks . 😊👍🏼

Senator Malcolm they don’t care for the elderly, they only care about confusing and controlling our young people’s minds and future. Love your honesty and stoicism in truth! Thank you 🙏 🧡🇦🇺

No government is going to magically fix Australia, especially labour or one nation. In my view, this isn’t just a problem of one party, one politician, or even one country. Across much of the world we’ve watched political leaders, corporations, lobbyists and financial interests accumulate enormous wealth and influence while ordinary people struggle with housing, inflation, healthcare and the rising cost of living. The issue isn’t simply who is in power. It’s the system itself. We’ve built a culture that rewards endless accumulation, competition and short-term self-interest rather than cooperation, community and stewardship. I don’t think the answer is putting our faith in another politician. I think the long-term answer is creating systems that encourage fairness, accountability, local resilience and a willingness to share resources rather than endlessly hoard them. A society only works when people recognise that we’re all connected. When wealth, opportunity and power become concentrated in fewer and fewer hands, eventually the system starts breaking down for everyone.

Can you smell smoke

Private health insurance providers are also making massive profits, health should never be about profit for them or our government, we all pay medicare.

Nice to see an Australian making sense.

The government forgets that we didn't just take out private health when we turned 65. In our case I started it the year I started working 1974. Yes that's how long my family funded our own health care from. We could afford it - dual income. We chose to stay out of the public system to leave it to people who needed it. Now as aged pensioners we try to keep it up. We are no longer on top cover but we do get hospitals paid for although now with an excess. It has been a struggle but we did it so others could use the public system . Now as this government has seen fit to penalise us for that by removing the discount. Shame on the way they treat their elderly. They forget that one day that will be them . Only they won't be struggling to pay the bills on the age pension . They will have their government funded politicians pension. Won't affect them at all. This government is disgraceful. This week they have managed to lose the female vote and now older people. Great week Albo.

I'm 66 and have never had a 34% rebate on my health insurance. I used to get 30% until Howard cut it back to under 25%

“𝘗𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘴 — 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘌𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘯 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘴, 𝘸𝘩𝘰, 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘎𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘬𝘴, 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘩𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘴𝘦𝘵 — 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮 𝘣𝘺 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘶𝘨𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘯𝘦𝘰-𝘢𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘯 𝘗𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘤 𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘮𝘴. [...] 𝘐𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘯-𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘩𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘩𝘯𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘺 — 𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭, 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘴—𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘴, 𝘥𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘣𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺, 𝘢𝘥𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳, 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘣𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘴. 𝘍𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘭𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 [...]. 𝘓𝘦𝘵 𝘶𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘦 𝘱𝘶𝘳𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘥𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘮𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘦𝘵𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘌𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘯 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘮 𝘰𝘧 𝘐𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘶𝘴. 𝘐𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘢 𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘍𝘶𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘮 — 𝘦𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘱𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘍𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘯, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 — 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘭𝘪𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮, 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘫𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘶𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺.” — 𝗚𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗮𝘂𝗺𝗲 𝗙𝗮𝘆𝗲, 𝘓𝘦 𝘚𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦̀𝘮𝘦 𝘢̀ 𝘵𝘶𝘦𝘳 𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘶𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘴 (𝘗𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘴: 𝘊𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘪𝘤, 1981). 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯: '𝘞𝘩𝘺 𝘞𝘦 𝘍𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵: 𝘔𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘌𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘯 𝘙𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦', (𝘓𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘯: 𝘈𝘳𝘬𝘵𝘰𝘴 𝘔𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘢, 2011).

Nationalise the private healthcare system?

So logical but impervious to some ??

Exactly and well presented. They just don’t care.

Remind me, who introduced Medicare ???

Does anyone else's ex complain that that the kids say the red coloured Leggo bricks dont taste like strawberries when mixed with custard?

Dribble dribble dribble, a lot of words that say nothing.

Thankyou, Senator Malcolm Roberts for being a sane voice. Sadly, there doesn't seem to be too many logical reasonable voices these days.

Who are those witches?

She didn’t answer the question.

As a woman who has birthed 7 children 3 boys (now men) and 4 girls (now women) yes we women deserve safety and my sons will be the first to step up if they have to...... I have never birthed a they them and neither have my children my grandchildren are 3 males 3 females

They are not medical questions they are asking what is your perspective

Why can’t we just add the building codes that there needs to be 4 sets of toilets. Male, female, unisex, disabled and a parents room. Why can’t we give aistralians a choice on being who they want to be and allows those who feels safe to use a bathroom that desire. Why does it have to be an issue?

Can men use the women toilets in parliament?

Pass the buck, can't answer a question

what did I just watch 😳 Thankyou Senator Robert’s 👏

Concentrate your efforts on preventing DV.

Look at their body language. Katy Gallagher is cross armed. And looks 😡

Got to help with women's health. Free prostate examinations for all women over 50 🤣😂

State your position. It is easy enough.

Women are already at high risk of violation without intervention. This is now inviting men to a smorgasbord.

Is that a broken beer bottel around her neck😂😂😂😂😂😂

Her first answer - so smug.

Wait until their space is perpetrated then they be answering his questions.

Biological woman... "what does that even mean?"... someone was asleep in biology class 🤣🤣🤣

And Santa is real too

Everytime I go to the “ladies “ I will just bring my husband in to stand by the door - Question : can he just walk in and say he identifies as a woman whilst I pee - or does he have to borrow my lipstick ?

I think the gender debate has eroded individual rights. I get that a man who has undergone the prescribed requirements to define them as a woman under law is deemed as a woman under that law. l don’t have a problem with that, or them having equality in public spaces, but what l have a problem with is that people expected to go against their beliefs & values to suit a legal definition, despite their personal views. I’ll translate that to my home. If l go to the supermarket l have to accept all people are entitled to that forum, regardless. But I have a right to exlude people from my home that l don’t wish to be here, without having to justify my reasons. I believe a website/app that’s essentially a private domain should be able to set it’s own rules & requirements accordingly. However, there are various aspects in the case of GvT. One is that T registered based on the legal definition of ‘woman’, but it was against the rules of the site that stated one had to be a biological woman. They were on the site for about a year, interacting with women with no complaints, but an ‘audit’ saw G view T’s photo & deemed they weren’t a biological woman, so expelled them from the site. I believe that was their right. The conditions were laid out at the onset. Personally, having known transwomen, l don’t have a problem with believing transwomen have similar ‘experiences’ to cisgender women, & having them in my space is dependent on the person, not their ‘gender’. All this talk about biology ignores that essentially we are neither gender for the first part of our gestation, & the environment in the womb that can affect so much of our physiology can be extremely varied between individuals. I don’t give a shit who or what people are as long as we can respect & accept each other as individuals. ‘Don’t shit on me & we don’t have a problem.’ But, like l said, l have a problem with autonomy being eroded. Life can really suck. Life can be incredibly difficult. But we all have our cross to bear & bear it we must. Even if that cross is non acceptance in a certain arena. The one thing that blows my mind is pregnancy protection for transwomen.🤯 Transmen l could understand. There are those that retain their female reproductive organs so they can have a biological child. (I get it, but, man, l think it’s so wrong to fuck around with biology like that, to subject any soul /child to that kind of hormone cocktail.🤯) And it’s not protection in creating a family by surrogacy or adoption, it’s for pregnancy. In my time l’ve been maybe one of the greatest ‘civil libertarians’ of our time, been criticised & ‘condemned’ for it. But, ‘pregnancy’ protection for people unable to become pregnant? Seriously?

So this office for women is basically set up to protect women who are being held back by men. So when a woman doesn’t feel comfortable-and won’t- use a toilet because a biological male is in there, wouldn’t that be one of the reasons the office exists?

VOTE ONE NATION AND SAVE AUSTRALIA 🇦🇺

No 1 strategy to keeping women safe is keeping men away from them or not allowing them to be placed in the vulnerable position of being alone with strange or unsafe men.