“Operational factor” means we wanted to shame him publicly

Chem trails?

The federal government has allocated roughly $320.5 million total to the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI) and spent around $231 million on broader war crimes probes, rather than a single specific figure for Ben Roberts-Smith alone. The overall expenditure covers multiple investigations, not just the case against Mr. Roberts-Smith

Kangaroo court. Need to happen in Sydney. Jury would been made all migrants. Most likely the ones he at war with so they. Jury turn on him if Brisbane it would been hard due most like be Australia in the Jury.

She cant answer questions.

Cover it up

How can a trial by media be a fair trial?

They arrested him that way after tipping off the media so they could get their version out first. Get ahead of the narrative.

They would’ve got more results looking for political corruption

Maybe stop sending them to war….. maybe spend more effort in collaboration, in partnership, understanding. Accept differences….

Wait til the court case results.

The way they arrested him was a publicity & political stunt as he was never a flight risk & even said if they just called him he would have handed himself in to the afp....🙄

Didn’t they make a spectacle of it to impress the far left Government, win brownie points and brown nose for promotions?

It just makes me shake my head in disgust. I hope that the actual reason comes out at the trial. That will be under oath.

Risk of publicity? Who leaked the arrest to start with? And why in a high profile location?

🙏🙏🙏🙏🌹🌹

Read transcripts of the events

So if it was operational why was it necessary to inform and have media camera there at the same time.... Disappointed you didn't ask why the media knew it was about to happen?

Thanku

King Cooker still cooking 🤣

Is it true that the AFP special squad whatever and the Government have changed the requirement to be arrested or charged for war crimes and made it EASIER to be charged now than it was at the time of the alleged events? In Other words, they have specifically re engineered the law to secure a conviction?

Anti-vax cooker be cookin’

If the Australian people paid for the research the Australian people should own the patents.

Thank you Senator Malcolm Roberts for your continuous efforts on keeping everyone safe

Thank you malcolm 🙏🏻

Is this regarding the Moderna lab being built in Vic senator?

Thank you SEN Roberts. Nobody but you is asking the hard questions

Awesome questioning Malcolm.

How much aluminium do you reckon you take in from your tinfoil hat, Mal?

The First Rule of the Dunning Kruger Club is.. you don't know you're a member of the Dunning Kruger Club.

Keep cooking Mal

Good on you Malcolm..💜🇦🇺

Thankyou Malcolm Roberts for all you're doing..Jesus was also mocked n ridiculously persecuted...we the people, can handle that...thankyou for standing up, for what's the integrity of our souls, the true ones...those that mock us, are evil...and they have lost....🔔🔔🔔🔔💯💜💚🙏🙏❤️❤️

If we the Australian people fund it we own it

Love your hard work Senator Malcolm Roberts 👌

This is Malcolm summed up

Keep on them

Thank you, Malcolm Roberts. Staggering amounts of taxpayer money, apparently down the drain. Funny how these eye-wateringly well paid people never seem to come prepared with a few notes on an Excel spreadsheet about their multi million dollar projects. Date: Grant amount: Recipient/s: Title of Grant: Project leader: Progress statement: Outcome statement: Return on investment. Recipient of profits: Benefits to taxpayers. It’s not hard. (I hadn’t even read Malcolm Roberts’ own statement. This was just in response to the interaction.) You’d want more feedback than that if you’d sent him out to buy coffee ☕️ ☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️

Go get Em Senator Malcolm Roberts

Vote One Nation 🧡🧡🇦🇺🇦🇺

He is truly an embarrassment 🤦‍♀️

Burecraps scammers

who arethe exerts ???

Good science is based on rigorous testing and investigation. If the science can't withstand the questions of transparency, that says something more about the science than the person asking questions. Accountability, responsibility and transparency are the public's right to know. The old slogan of 'trust the science', doesn't pass the pub test anymore without due diligence, and if the scientists are offended by the question, or can't answer the question, obviously there's a problem. Big dollar spends deserve answers and accountability to the people. To ask a question that many would like to know the answer to, does not warrant disrespect. If the science is solid, there shouldn't be a problem with providing the answer. If the funding is being wasted, or the product is causing harm, that's a problem. If the results impacted your family, you'd want to know. The minister is doing his job and is asking fair and reasonable questions. To resort to name calling to try to diminish his character, is an admission of failure and exhausted intelligence on those responsible.

Great questions ! They must prove Vaccine safety or be defund and removed from compulsory list!

Find out how your dementia medication is going.