where's the column for calculating how much less super you'll have? that would be important to include, so people can compare the two figures

Is it okay for us to spend it on hair treatment? I’ve been bald for a few years now, I just shaved it cos I thought I was thinning but I wish I hung in there for a few years longer cos now my hair doesn’t grow on top at all… it’s pretty good around the back and sides still but just on top it doesn’t grow much at all anymore Can we maybe use our super for a hair piece? Just a thought that I had

Still not willing to show the impact on super balance at retirement I see.

You only taking notice of super now since Gerard Rennick People First Party has been talking about it the last year.

Now tell every one how much lower their super balance will be. 🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️ Lets save 6% on our mortgage by removing money from a tax advantaged retirement scheme that has averaged 8% returns. You couldn't make this shit up.

Well good golly Miss Molley, PHON have ACTUAL worked out figures, for one of their policies. Will this be a new and valued shift, from the normal skeet shooting at windmills policy costing approach?? But isn't it wonderful that they are so interested in giving median wage earners an extra $44/wk, when they earn $90K/year. Yet voted against the increase to the minimum wage, which is much less. Then you have to look at the Interest saved over the life of the loan. Huge, or is it. While they give a 30 year loan, which is about right on a signed mortgage. The ACTUAL life of a loan, is much less in this country. What's not costed, is the loss to a person retirement nest egg, when they reach retirement age. This scheme favours those on higher incomes who are closer to retirement and have Mortgage and/or Investment loans to service. Doesn't sound like your general PHON members now does it. Besides those sitting in Parliament, I mean.

Less tax on everything would benefit people more and then leave the super how it is for a half decent retirement. This is nothing but a band-aid short term.

So long as the taxpayer does not have to fund yr retirement

Vote One Nation Party

Big banks lobbyists will be all over getting this shut down

Education is the state's primary weapon for mind control because it is the one institution that operates on the most vulnerable, at the most formative age, for the longest duration, under the threat of compulsion. No other institution can do what the state does through schools: shape the foundational worldview before the individual is old enough to question it. The state's other tools — surveillance, legislation, the sword — operate on the external person. Education operates on the internal person: the mind, the conscience, the capacity to think. And it does so at the point of maximum vulnerability Compulsory: You cannot opt out without legal penalty (truancy laws) Early: Begins at age 4–5, before critical thinking is developed Prolonged: Thousands of hours over 10–11 years Total The child's entire social world is the school; the teacher is the authority figure.Repetitive The same worldview is reinforced daily, for years, until it becomes "normal" Compartmentalised The child is age-segregated, curriculum-locked, and isolated from outside voices As the research on coercive control confirms, these are the exact features of a destructive mind-control environment Access to non-cult sources of information minimised or discouraged [government-approved textbooks and curriculum]. Compartmentalisation of information; outsider vs. insider doctrines. Extensive use of cult-generated information and propaganda." The child in a state school is told: this is how the world is, this is what is true, this is what you should believe, and if you question it, you are wrong. That is not education. That is indoctrination. The state is not merely omitting God. It is actively teaching the opposite. The public school does not teach "nothing" about God. It teaches that materialism is the final reality, that there is no Creator, that morality is subjective, and that the state's definitions are the only definitions. That is not neutrality. That is a positive, comprehensive, anti-Christian worldview — installed in the mind of a child who has no capacity to resist. This is the "ape of God" in its most systematic and deliberate form. The state is doing what only God can do — forming the mind, shaping the soul, determining what is true — but doing it without God's authority, without God's love, and without God's truth. God's work in the mind The state's work in the mind Reveals truth (Jn. 14:6) Imposes a false worldview (materialism, moral relativism) Frees the mind (Jn. 8:32) Binds the mind (compulsory attendance, compulsory curriculum) Invites voluntary response Demands compulsory compliance Forms the conscience to love God and neighbour Forms the conscience to love the state and its definitions Operates on the willing heart The word is tyranny. Not "policy." Not "education reform." Tyranny. Because a monopoly on the formation of the mind is a monopoly on the formation of the soul — and the soul belongs to God, not to the state. The Coercive Control Parallel This is where the abusive-relationship thread reaches its most personal point. In coercive control, the abuser's most powerful tool is isolation from the outside voice. The state does this through education: The child is isolated from the family's worldview for 6–7 hours a day, 5 days a week, for 11 years. The teacher is the authority figure — not the parent, not the pastor, not God. The child learns: the person in charge of my mind is the state. The curriculum is the "reality" — what is taught is what is true. What is not taught does not exist. The child who asks "What about God?" is told that question is inappropriate in a science lesson. The child is made dependent on the state's definitions of truth, morality, and reality. By the time the child is old enough to think for themselves, the state's worldview is already internalised — it feels like "normal." This is exactly what the abuser does: sever the victim from the one person who actually loves them, and replace that relationship with the abuser's own. The state severs the child from God — not by a dramatic decree, but by a quiet, systematic, 11-year programme of omission, redefinition, and replacement. The state is not merely "regulating" education. It is claiming jurisdiction over the formation of the child's mind — and the formation of the mind is not the state's jurisdiction. It is God's. The UN's International Guidance on Sexuality Education (produced under UN Education 2030, co-signed by UNICEF) is being rolled out to all UN member states, with formal CSE starting at age 5. The entire framework rests on the "research" of Alfred Kinsey (1948, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male; 1953, Sexual Behavior in the Human Female). The critical facts: 1. The data on children's "orgasms" came from paedophiles Kinsey's own words: "We have secured information on 317 pre-adolescents who were either observed in self-masturbation, or who were observed in contacts with other boys or older adults." The "observations" were self-reported accounts from known paedophiles, presented to Kinsey as data. One source, a man identified in the research as a paedophile whose encounters with children exceeded 600, had his diaries recorded directly into Kinsey's published text. The "experiments" on infants were not experiments. The data showing that babies as young as 2 months could achieve "orgasm" was based on adult "stimulation" of children's genitals — described in one instance as an 11-month-old achieving 11 "orgasms" in one hour. No independent verification. No ethical review. No documentation of who the children were or where they came from. . The conclusion was predetermined. Kinsey's stated aim was to prove that "children are sexual from birth" and that "there is no abnormality and no normality." The data was selected and presented to confirm that conclusion. As one critique put it: Kinsey's ideas — that children are sexual from birth, that masturbation is healthy, that no sexual act should be excluded from the definition of "normal" — are "commonplace in modern sex education." The pipeline runs: Kinsey → SIECUS (founded by Kinsey's co-author Wardell Pomeroy) → UNESCO → WHO → national curricula Inc the UK. The state sexualises children not because it cares about them, but because the ideology requires the destruction of innocence. Innocence is the child's link to the Father's voice — the voice that says "You are made in My image. Your body is holy. You are not a sexual object. You belong to Me." Remove that voice, and the state's definitions become the only definitions. The child is free — free to be shaped & controlled entirely by the state. This is the "ape of God" in its most total and inescapable form total control. The state is not merely monitoring. It is building a digital prison with no walls — a prison that is everywhere, always on, and inescapable The critical feature: the digital prison has no walls you can see. The ankle tag is visible. The internet restriction is invisible. The audit trail is invisible. The kill switch is invisible. The person is imprisoned without knowing the full extent of the prison. That is the panopticon — and it is not a metaphor. It is enacted UK law. In an abusive relationship, the abuser's endgame is total inescapability. The victim cannot leave because the abuser controls the money, the car, the phone, the children, the outside contacts. The digital prison does the same at the civilisational scale..

Imagine pulling from your retirement savings to give to your fucking landlord. Are you higher than usual Malcolm?

C'mon One Nation! C'mon Australia, FINALLY we have an option for common sense and for the Aussie worker and Aussie family!! Labor and Liberal have been in power way too long, they are cowards, liars, anti Australian, incompetent, criminals!!! We are on our knees. Open your eyes... petrol skyrocketing, groceries skyrocketing, utilities skyrocketing, regos, insurances, etc all skyrocketing, and the left wing commie labor party calls your hard earned super 'OUR' super!!!!! They want to make it a national asset????!!!! NO WAY IT IS YOUR SUPER TO ASSIST YOU!!! Super is no good if you die before you get to use it!! One Nation for COMMON SENSE!!!!

DEPENDS ON HOW MUCH THE GOVERNMENT ARE GOING TO SCAM YOU FOR LATER IN LIFE.

Senator Malcolm Roberts, do you have the capacity to articulate this as a policy or are you only good at AI memes? Barnaby who’s a far superior and experienced politician than you struggled to answer the questions so it’s unlikely you’re able to.

Time to collect your superannuation & retire old man………🤣

My superannuation is paying 9% over the last 10 years your figures are 🐂💩 The biggest winners over this policy are the Billionaires and the losers are the people you pretend to represent.

Pity it isn't very financially sound...but you couldn't give a crap. Whatever appeals to your ignorant, uninformed and uneducated supporters is all you are interested in.

Jesus, you're an idiot. Cost out your policies, you really are the most unserious political party.

Why are ✝️ Christians converting to ☪️ Islam? 1. Islam is the religion of humanity, a religion of peace and mercy. 2. Christianity is not a religion. 3. The Bible is corrupted. O ✝️ Christians, wake up! You are not followers of the Prophet Jesus, peace be upon him and mercy. Look around you; Islam is the fastest-growing religion in Europe and America, and it will spread throughout the world. This is God's true promise, even if all the people of the earth dislike it.