Push for details as much as possible. I think you will find it’s more risky then there are being honest about .

So risky. Great government that puts new home owners under this pressure 😡

2% for single women, the same it's been for indigenous loans for a long time. How is that working out? What happens when the single woman isn't single after a couple of months?

Surely these 5% deposit loans are also paying a higher interest rate to factor in too

The subprime financial crisis 2.0 in the making?

So true , Labor closed the previous LNP government's policy allowing access to your own superannuation to fund a 10 or 20 percent deposit which makes low risk financial scence for first home buyers , yet they encourage 5 percent deposit which is much higher risk 🤔

Labor push up the rents and then blame everybody who held down a job

Well done, Senator Malcolm Roberts we need more like you like Pauline Hanson my Bernardi. We need these people to ask the hard questions. Liam Bartlett is a great reporter I only mentioned him off the top of my head because I find nearly all of the Fox News team exceptional. Any others just really good. I suppose we need real questions asked and real answers given answers cannot be given in some form of retribution has to be taken against these people that withhold public information.

ON a helping young home buyers again - NOT

It am banks have a 3% buffer on top of the loan interest rate at the time to allow for changes in rates. Does the government do the same ?

Well said one nation 💯 I be voting for one nation before we lose our country like UK

Come catch Malcom! By design everything is by design! These people are going to get caught out! The government will bail them out with a catch! They get equity and spare room access! It’s been written for years, it will happen and most likely a spare bedroom tax on the rich! Just like digital ID, currency and ai surveillance and it will prob happen before 2028.

So glad to have someone like you in Government. Thankyou!!!

Push this issue, senator Malcolm Roberts.

Shut the fuck up you old, entitled cunts.

It’s all a big scam, can’t trust the labor criminals

Good on you Malcolm..more integrity than all labor greens etc put together..we need rid of putrid commo assholes.

Got to give him credit for actually answering the question… unlike others who” take it on notice “ but sounds like a word salad that says we are looking after our mates..

A circus made to go around, circle the wagon until the money cannot be traced.

another 1 being questions is taking it out on his pen..been a few lately doing this.

There needs to be an independent audit performed.

They have a fiduciary duty to the people - transparency being 1 of 11.

They write the rules so they can rort the system

Thank goodness you are here Malcolm Roberts!!

Senator Malcolm Roberts. RCP 8.5 is being dropped from climate modeling because it is no longer considered a plausible scenario for future greenhouse gas emissions. Developed more than two decades ago as part of the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs), RCP 8.5 represented an extreme high-emissions trajectory, assuming a world heavily reliant on coal with minimal climate policy intervention, projecting around 5°C of warming by 2100. Over time, however, empirical observations and energy trends have diverged from these assumptions—renewable energy, natural gas, and nuclear power have grown, while coal use is not expanding at the levels assumed. Research demonstrated that such a coal-dominated, high-emissions pathway was unrealistic from the outset. The scenario became embedded as the "business-as-usual" case in climate research, policy, and financial planning, despite being implausible. Its persistence led to a significant overemphasis on worst-case outcomes in both scientific publications and public discourse. The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project's seventh phase (CMIP7) officially eliminated RCP 8.5 (and its CMIP6 successor SSP5-8.5) from the standard set of climate scenarios, acknowledging that high-end emissions projections are now inconsistent with observed trends and modern energy transition dynamics. This change reflects a major correction in climate modeling to align scenario inputs with realistic socio-economic and energy developments, rather than policy-driven effects. In summary, RCP 8.5 is retired because it was never a likely future: its assumptions about energy use and emissions have been empirically invalidated, so continuing to use it risks misleading research, policy, and public understanding.

"Why did the school ask the maths teacher to mark the maths tests?" That's basically the question. The Clean Energy Regulator still runs the scheme. It didn't hand control to the Clean Energy Council. It appointed them to maintain the approved product lists because they've already been assessing solar panels, batteries and inverters for years and have the technical systems in place to do it. The Regulator still sets the rules and audits compliance. � Clean Energy Council +1 Malcolm's question only sounds suspicious if you leave out the part where the Clean Energy Council has literally been doing this type of product assessment work for years.

The moment they mention “under the law”or “is entirely legal” or in the “legal framework”, it quickly translates into; They’ve spent a ton of money with lawyers exploring the very edges of the grey areas of the legal framework and formed their “policies” in those dark corners, definitely not in the good faith of the law, but a poofteenth of a maybe it’s legal and they’ll use even more taxpayer dollars to tie it up in court forever if they get caught out (While that is happening they’re getting their own way)

Smells of brown paper bags full of cash. Jobs for the mates

Excellent work Senator Roberts

Sounds like jobs for the boys.

If the ah and ums were taken out of this ,it would of only taken 30 seconds

Keep up the good work!

Join the government it’s the only way to get super rich In a few months

What a handball

The whole thing is there’s nothing clean about renewable energy. In fact it’s worse than all the other energy sources that we had previously.!!!🙄

Yep and tariff only applies once a year now , redundant

Very fishy 🧡🧡🧡

Is a job for the boys

What the hell, what do these guys actually do

The system ensures redundancy as it requires manufacturers to pay to maintain a products “currency”. When manufacturers launch new models they don’t continue to pay currency for the old models so they become non compliant - Powerwall 2 case in point

Corruption even under the law does not mean it was not corruption

he Current Laws and Treaties Gates's Network Has Influenced ​The Future Made in Australia Act ​The Mechanism: This massive legislative package serves as Australia’s direct answer to the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act. Federal Energy Minister Chris Bowen has openly cited data and investment logic aligned with Breakthrough Energy Ventures (BEV) to justify these multi-billion-dollar subsidies. ​The Play: The law legally locks in billions in taxpayer funded "production tax incentives" for green hydrogen and critical minerals processing. Gates's portfolio is heavily stacked with companies that require exactly these kinds of domestic processing laws to survive commercialization (such as his investments in next-gen lithium refining tech). ​The International "Mission Innovation" Inter-Governmental Frameworks ​The Mechanism: At the legislative and treaty level, Australia legally bound itself to "Mission Innovation"—a global pact designed alongside Gates's Breakthrough Energy Coalition. ​The Play: This framework dictated how the Australian government restructured the legal mandates of ARENA (Australian Renewable Energy Agency) and the CEFC (Clean Energy Finance Corporation). Instead of deploying existing commercial tech like basic solar panels, Australian law was shifted to require these agencies to act as high-risk venture capital funds, effectively using public tax dollars to absorb the early financial risks for technologies Gates invests in. ​State-Level Sovereign Wealth Alignment (e.g., Breakthrough Victoria) ​The Mechanism: Individual Australian state laws established government-backed investment bodies designed to mimic Gates's venture model. ​The Play: In late 2024, Victoria's state-owned investment vehicle, Breakthrough Victoria, co-invested millions alongside Bill Gates's Breakthrough Energy Ventures into Type One Energy, an American company trying to commercialize stellarator-based nuclear fusion. State law was leveraged to channel public funds into highly speculative, long-term energy bets that directly benefit Gates’s co-investment syndicates. ​The Future Laws Gates’s Apparatus Is Actively Targeting ​Aviation Fuel Mandates (Aviation White Paper & Fuel Standards Legislation) ​The Target: Breakthrough Energy is pushing hard for Australia to mandate a Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) mandate for all domestic flights. ​The Play: Gates is heavily invested in companies converting alcohol and waste into jet fuel. If his policy arms can successfully lobby the Australian government to pass a law requiring airlines to use a minimum percentage of SAF (similar to laws rolling out in Europe), it creates a legally captive, non-negotiable multi-billion dollar market for BEV's fuel-tech portfolio. ​The National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (NGER) Act 2007 (Contrail Regulation) ​The Target: Breakthrough Energy has a dedicated, internal Contrails Team that develops proprietary AI software to predict and avoid high-climate-impact contrails (the cloud-like vapor trails left by planes, which trap atmospheric heat). ​The Play: The future goal here is to get aviation regulators like Airservices Australia and the federal government to amend the NGER Act or civil aviation regulations to legally count contrails toward an airline's carbon footprint. Once contrails are legally classified as a measurable pollutant, airlines will be legally forced to adopt the exact tracking and mitigation software Gates’s team has already patented. ​Overhauling Mining and Subsurface Rights for "White Hydrogen" ​The Target: State and federal mining laws (Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Acts). ​The Play: Breakthrough Energy is tracking investments into "White Hydrogen" (naturally occurring hydrogen trapped underground). Currently, Australian mining laws are incredibly messy regarding who owns naturally occurring gases that aren't traditional fossil fuels. Gates’s policy network is quietly supporting a push to rewrite subsurface property and extraction laws across Australian states to ensure that extraction rights for naturally occurring hydrogen are fast-tracked, highly profitable, and protected from traditional oil and gas blockades. Your a fucken weasel #AnthonyAlbanese