He recruited several people and placed them in key positions in health agencies all over the world.

Frank Zappa taught me this in the early 70s do I surrender my tin foil hat now? Now I just watch the world crumble but I can’t stop laughing shouldn’t of studied that Zen Buddhism for 35 years

It's the food and lifestyle choices people make.

The Americans simply eat to much. One pizza is sufficient for a whole week.

He is pardoned for a reason.....

That says a lot

Been part of a few retirement groups, but none compare to Financial Freedom Alliance (FFA)—top-tier insights.

Mengele was apprentice only, if compared to him.

FBI got all his files, should get interesting now

You wouldn't be surprised if he would eventually be recognised as the worst serial killer. From books like "The real Anthony Fauci" there's a lot more than covid vaccines.

Judy Vaughn

6feet of rope can fix a lot of things

Been part of a few retirement groups, but none compare to Financial Freedom Alliance (FFA)—top-tier insights.

Nuremberg for all involved

Why is this man not in jail !!

So when he and the scientists and all the people involved are going to be made accountable

Have to be held accountable !!

How do they get away with this

And still the criminal walks free.I think he knows to much about others.

If we did these things we would be locked up for life .

Gulliotene for him.

This is the guy that put everyone through the mask and distancing agenda and even said I a congressional meeting said he just made it up. Yeah that's what we are dealing with. These people have no clue, and you keep backing them because Facebook said it was ok.

A jigsaw can’t be completed without all the pieces Just sayin

You talking about the PM

Good, so don't go sitting on the fence.

Had to meme it to avoid autocorrect screwing him over.

Probably the only one that doesn’t

I’ve got this graph……..

According to FB fact checkers we all do.

The E-Karen will cancel you!

Cookers always call it that

I’m part of the club too

Take the Sing away and that would make more sense

You keep tellling yourself that.

Sure do cooker

What is the ing about? You were honest before those 3 letters were added!

So close Malcolm, I thought you might have posted something truthful for a change.

Is that Australian for “alternative facts?”

The heat capacity of a gas does not affect its greenhouse potential on the Earth. The frequency/wavelength of its Infrared (IR) absorption/emission lines in relation to the frequency/wavelength of the IR being emitted by the Earth and the air above the surface of the Earth is very important in determining the Greenhouse potential of a gas. The other important issue is the concentration of the Greenhouse gas (the concentration of CO2 is much lower than that of water vapor and the molecular mass of CO2 is 44 compared to 18 g/mol for water vapor). Therefore the greenhouse potential of CO2 is much less than that of water since the average concentration of water vapor in the atmosphere is 5 times that of CO2 and molecule for molecule the spectrum of water vapor is a better match for the IR emissions of the planet. Depending upon who you believe the Greenhouse gas potential of CO2 is between 3% of the Greenhouse Effect (GHE) and 24%. Almost all of the rest is water vapor and clouds (methane/ozone and NO2 are almost negligible). The greenhouse potential of the much more prevalent diatomic molecules in the atmosphere, i.e. N2 and O2 is almost nil because their IR spectrum in almost blank. HOWEVER, there are effects which are important in the heat balance in the atmosphere and for which N2 and O2 are important. They are much more concentrated than CO2, i.e. 790,000 ppm for N2 compared to 400 ppm for CO2, and they carry away heat from CO2 molecules. The contribution of heating in the atmosphere from conduction and radiative absorption is therefore more than a little controversial. Also, the contribution from convection by thermals and clouds is also HUGE. Saying that this “science is settled” is ABSURD. There is a LOT to learn. Simply plugging in 3–24% of the 20 degree C total GHE for CO2 as a percentage of the total and then compared the human contribution to CO2 compared to natural sources, can provide a ROUGH estimate of the best and worst case contribution of humans. In so doing, with the <5% human contribution to CO2 emissions (38 Gt CO2/year) compared to the total CO2 emissions (e.g. plant decay, forest fores, volcanoes, exchange with the oceans, etc. of >800 Gt CO2/year and the 0.06–5 deg. C total CO2 GHE, you can come up with a very approximate estimate of the possible human contribution to climate change (before cloud feedbacks) of 0.006 to 0.5 deg. C. That is too small to worry about and almost certainly beneficial. CO2 increases are beneficial for reasons of plant growth. Bottom line: CO2 is a Greenhouse Gas but changes in its concentration are too small to cause any concern for the climate but DO have a huge positive effect on Plant Growth.

Love it Malcom, know the information that is true and down your research, before giving out the information. Knowing is knowledge

Did you tell the truth again?

I tell them to get ed.............i just tell it how it is

It wasn't missing, you just made it up.

Wrong, it's definitely Mis

Love it . Good one Malcolm

Hmmmm....now that's very naughty for last 5 years, most of us were spreading "misinformation" and look how it's actually turning into reality Thank you so much for spreading the TRUTH great job and keep going please

Keep doing it. We need more of this