COVID Royal Commission Draft Terms of Reference Release

Pauline Hanson’s One Nation is giving the Australian people a say about a Royal Commission into the management of the COVID-19 pandemic by Australian governments.

While the Prime Minister may be prepared to wait and kick this can down the road, One Nation is not.

I’ve been working with Pauline Hanson on developing draft terms of reference for the Royal Commission. We want to make sure these terms of reference capture all of the information which Australians need to see – the deliberations of National Cabinet, the advice from health bureaucrats which state and territory governments used to justify lockdowns and vaccine mandates, and the real data on COVID-19 deaths.

We’ve posted these draft terms of reference on the One Nation website and we’re now asking for input from the Australian people. It’s absolutely essential this Royal Commission enables individual Australians to tell their stories of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Thousands of Australians lost their jobs due to lockdowns and mandates. Our children’s education was severely interrupted. Businesses across Australia suffered significant losses or closed altogether. Australian governments spent hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars in pandemic relief. Experimental vaccines were rushed through approvals and imposed on millions of Australians. This has been one of the most disruptive events in our history.

Australians who’d like to provide feedback are invited to visit the One Nation website: https://www.onenation.org.au/covid-19-royal-commission-draft-tor

8 replies
  1. Jon McCafferty
    Jon McCafferty says:

    Please explain why all main stream media companies became propaganda outlets for the government, they did not report on any protests, or if they did, it was biased and derogatory of the people protesting, who were labelled ‘Anti-vaxers’ as if the protesters were mentally deranged. MSM were also guilty of fearmongering by broadcasting ‘fake news’ and false data that was contrived to create panic or to manipulate people into being vaccinated.

  2. john
    john says:

    Royal Commission
    There could be a few issues with this.
    An impartial Commissioner. It will be hard to find one.
    These federal and state politicians’ other government departments, health care, media and other groups that pushed the narrative and poisons should all be charged with genocide.
    Although we the people know that there are few within the fore mentioned that are true to the Australian people and voiced their opposition.
    Any person that has gained financially through administering the poison should also be charged with genocide.
    Then we go back to Gods law.
    An eye for an eye
    A life for a life.
    We start at the top and work our way down.
    Death penalty should be a double dose of the poison each week until they expire.
    Let them suffer as the people they put to the knife.
    By the way there is no covid

    • LEONIE
      LEONIE says:

      Well said and I agree wholeheartedly Jon. The amount of media manipulation was unprecedented and the only opinion was theirs. An experimental mRNA vaccine given to all and sundry on the advice of “experts” (which is hilarious in itself) to the unsuspecting public which obviously didn’t do any researching properly and fell for the garbage the msm spewed night & day. I call that mind control to the nth degree. They still haven’t to this day isolated this Covid19 virus. What they actually gave everyone that took the jab was a stage 4 poison in which I have a copy of a document that someone sent me which was done in 2016 for the rollout in 2021 from our government.

    • kiwi
      kiwi says:

      excellent comment John, the problem with any inquiry is that the institutions are
      riddled with freemasons and they will side track it, bury facts hide the truth etc
      the the lies about a non existent “virus” must be exposed, the corrupted
      government must be investigated and guilty politicians, civil servants etc
      must be tried for their treason

  3. Kerri Cross
    Kerri Cross says:

    Hi I had a career if 14 yrs in the department of education and was waiting in clear evidence that the then ( and is now) mandatory Covid jabs. The education department via HR would not give me the evidence to satisfy my undertaking the procedure that they enforced , saying it was my job to find that data. I made the heartfelt painful decision to resign as I could see the science wasnt sufficient evidence for me to put an experimental substance into my body. I went to the fair work via phone and the occupational work place safely ( again by phone) and both groups said it was not their area and if it was they could not help me in this matter. My question is – why did they several times refuse what I thought was their duty cheers

  4. Neil Skilbeck
    Neil Skilbeck says:

    Good morning,

    The Australian government originally said (approx the end of 2020 and early 2021) that the only way out of the pandemic was through vaccination. Vaccinations were started in early 2021 reaching a 90% coverage by the middle of this year. So if the vaccines were safe an effective we should have seen a fall of covid deaths. However the reverse is the case. Our world in data.org shows that at the end of 2020 there were 909 deaths due to covid by the end of 2021 there was another 1,344 deaths and during this year (2022) so far there is another 13,476 covid deaths! There can only be two conclusions. At the very least you need to admit that the vaccines have completely failed but you may also conclude (owing to the huge amount of deaths since the vaccine roll-out) that the vaccine may have caused the excessive amount of deaths.

    Our government had signed a contract with the various Pharmaceutical companies to sell millions of doses of so called vaccines. So it was in their interests to convince everyone that the jabs were properly tested, safe and effective and so they saturated the TV and radio with dishonest claims about the jabs to the public. They heightened this endeavor scaring people by their fear campaigns regarding a so called virus (that had never been isolated) that was out to get everyone. If they were honest they would have had to say that the jabs were new technology, they were not really vaccines in the traditional sense and that it was designed to affect the genetic makeup of people’s bodies. The vaccines had not been properly tested and in fact it had been shown by Visa’s post market report that over 1,000 people had died soon after taking the shots. The government was therefore negligent in not revealing this information. Further to this they used their government department APHRA to gag the MD’s to prevent them from providing this same honest information to their patients. APHRA in reality was countermanding a Doctors basic oath which by law they must carry out. The government was monitoring the rates of vaccinated people so to quicken the pace they supported companies in the unprecedented drive of mandating the jabs. This was a disgusting act as people were faced with a critical decision that affected a basic right of their livelihood.

    I am sure that you have looked at the inaccuracy of the PCR test ( which is the gold standard) for Covid diagnosis. The huge damage caused by the unproven use lock-downs, masks and social distancing.

    The Federal government claimed that they had very little to do with the Pandemic as the domain of “health” rests with the states. While the states do play a large part in administering people’s health it is not their sole responsibility. In fact where ever Federal laws have been developed regarding health matters the states cannot countermand these laws Section 109 of the Australian Constitution. The Bio security Act 2015, a Federal law dealing with Pandemics was in place. There are many aspects of this law that the states did not follow but one of these was to close their borders. Section 28 of the act states that boarders must be left open during pandemics in harmony with Section 92 of the Australian Constitution. So the Federal government was negligent in carrying out its proper duty in bringing the states in line with this law.

    I hope that these few ideas will help in framing up the commission’s frame of reference.

    Neil Skilbeck

  5. Robin Wood
    Robin Wood says:

    A royal commission is words by the Albo’s Communist controlling labor party Government and will there ever be a commitment to any of his talking, or just to have people at bay while the Globalists stakeholders and shareholders involved kill us off one way or another.

Comments are closed.