The Consumers Health Forum (CHF) seeks to understand how society in Australia has been impacted by COVID and the COVID response. This not-for-profit organisation was founded approximately 40 years ago and is funded by the Australian Government – as the primary national healthcare consumer organisation under the Health Peak and Advisory Bodies Program.

CEO Dr Elizabeth Deveny seeks to support Australians experiencing ill health as a consequence of the pandemic. She agrees that deferred healthcare needs to be examined in a Royal Commission, as she believes a good COVID response needs to be an enduring one. There needs to be a coordinated response to support unwell Australians to return to health — regardless of whether the cause is from COVID, or the government and health authorities response to COVID.

The CHF seeks a broad and independent Royal Commission into COVID. She says hearing from people impacted by the COVID response will provide Australians with a voice and help restore trust. There will be those who are still suffering trauma or whose lives are still in turmoil. Allowing private sessions will give those witnesses, regardless of their background, an opportunity to come forward and disclose their evidence without exposing them publicly to negative impacts.

The current inquiry commissioned by PM Albanese is run by those who advocated for the very same COVID response the inquiry is supposed to be critiquing. Understandably, Australians need proof of impartiality to have the confidence to trust a Royal Commission. Dr Deveny suggests the selection process should involve the community and build from that point. We need to lift up the voices of health consumers to ensure that the Australian health system meets the needs of every citizen.

Transcript

Coming Soon

Supporting Health Consumers to be Better Informed

In 2019 the government published the Australian Health Management Plan for Pandemic Influenza. This substantial document was the result of 8 years of consultation. When COVID arrived, the government tossed this strategic plan in the bin — just 4 months after it was published.

I asked Dr Elizabeth Deveny, CEO of the Consumers Health Forum (CHF), if her organisation was consulted on this strategic health framework. Dr Deveny will respond to my question on notice.

I then asked Dr Deveny if the CHF is interested in investigating the reporting of adverse events and excess deaths due to the COVID ‘vaccines’. Since COVID ‘vaccines’ were rolled out, excess mortality is around 26,000 above normal annual mortality. The DAEN (Database of Adverse Event Notifications) is a surveillance system that receives reports of adverse events or side effects from medicines, vaccines, biological therapies and medical devices. It’s monitored by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).

Adverse events, including deaths from COVID ‘vaccines’ were reported to the DAEN — although we know there’s always under-reporting of these events. I outlined for Dr Deveny how official downgrading of approximately 1060 deaths originally tied to these experimental and novel COVID shots meant a large number was removed from the database, leaving 14 deaths attributed to the injections.

Dr. Deveny noted that consumers frequently struggle to find the appropriate channels and methods for lodging complaints about negative healthcare encounters. She believes that the current reporting procedures are not easily navigable for users. Consequently, many incidents involving medication, vaccines, biological therapies, or medical devices go unreported.

The CHF is advocating for improved mechanisms, especially during emergencies, to ensure Australians can easily report concerns about their health. They believe that individuals should be able to express their worries and receive guidance promptly. Both the government and the Australian public need to understand the repercussions of adverse events, as they impact everyone financially. As taxpayers, Australians deserve to comprehend the full effects of health interventions and their outcomes. The CHF supports transparency and is calling for a comprehensive Royal Commission into Australia’s COVID response to empower and inform all health consumers.

Transcript

Coming Soon

7 replies
  1. Denis Lyons
    Denis Lyons says:

    I want a full Royal Commission. People like Dan Andrews should never be allowed to get away with what he did. People need to be accountable for their orders & actions! They all became tyrant’s!

  2. Phillip neville
    Phillip neville says:

    She evaded your last question is not on.your side malcolm.30.000 aussies died as a result of bill gates poison and W H .O phizor.Johnson and Johnson we had children die there has to be a independant Royal commission..who can you trust for an honest..commission. love your work malcolm
    I am a one nation supporter one nation is the only honest caring party.love pauline gerrard Rennick get back to me please

  3. deb
    deb says:

    hi Malcolm The vaccine which left people no option but to take or lose their job is the most severe misjustice you can get
    People who didn’t get “the jab” took a huge backlash to there besl being from those who didI!! I had one & my husband 2 jabs in order to see our daughter abroad if we had to. It left me feeling short of breath & I gained at least 9 lb. Absolutely, these people who coordinated this misjustice should be brought to justice.

  4. Robert
    Robert says:

    Need to bring to heal the murderous & tyrannical AMA, (Australian Medical Association),
    or, should that be the (Australian Murderers Association), & also the RACofGP’s,
    and especially the Mafia like AHPRA,

  5. Garry
    Garry says:

    My assumption based on the brief review of the video One nation provided is that we would all be better served if Dr Elizabeth Deveny were to be invited to sit on the constituted Covid Royal Commission. Clearly thoughtful, articulate and with a broad brush approach to the issue. I doubt she would leave much unexplored in a review.

  6. Dessalegn Temesgen Leye
    Dessalegn Temesgen Leye says:

    Well, first of all, thank you the Office of honorable Senator Malcolm (The Team of Senator Robert’s Malcolm)!

    Secondly, please, please, and again please pass through the following my short relevant science related life history:
    1. I am an asst professor of biochemistry (a discipline that studies any chemical reacti
    n that takes place within a cell)
    2. In 1992, when may be most of you was NOT born, I was engaged in extraction sphingolipid from ox brain for further synthisizing lipose, a compound that can be coated drug’s active component). Because of which the mRNA recent vaccines’ producers used it in their products, as a result which perhaps, blood clotting and heart problem takes place, due to such lipid based synthesized components of the vaccines

    3. In 2003-4, I was one of those who were encountered with SARS-COV
    4. Today, I have 10 published works on COVID-19 issues
    5. As a result, have 6 groups of SCIENTIFIC justfications that can confirm the NONE feasibility of intramuscularly adminstrable mode of vaccination to STOP any respiratory tracts based pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2

    Dear Senator Roberts Malcolm’s Office Team, I can assure you that against my scientific findings, neither vaccine developers nor relevant scientists such as immunologists, biologists, biochemists, etc. can withstand!

    With respects,
    Dessalegn (PhD)

Comments are closed.