Australian values aren’t just words—they’re the spirit that runs through every Aussie heart.
Mateship means loyalty and giving everyone a fair go. Being fair dinkum means telling the truth and respecting real science—not opinions. Family is the foundation of our human existence, and our wonderful flag is more than just a symbol – it represents the spirit of our nation. Fairness, democracy and respect for others and our communities are core to who we are.
Freedom is fundamental. Freedom of speech, belief, movement, and life is non-negotiable. Australians value governments that protect life, property, and freedom—and then get out of the way.
It’s time we stood up and protected what makes Australia great.
Transcript
Australian values pronounce a spirit. They’re not tangible, but they’re there. They’re very strong. They run through every Australian’s heart. Let’s have a look at some of these. Mateship—what’s mateship? It’s giving people a fair go, you having a fair go yourself, and you supporting mates, as well as loyalty. Then it’s being fair dinkum—I hope the Greens take notice of this. That’s telling the truth and being open to science. Science is about objectivity and integrity, not opinion. Being fair dinkum means telling the truth on the science. Family is very important to Australians. It’s a fundamental building block and the organisation and structure of human existence. The flag—our wonderful flag—is the spirit of Australia. It’s not just a cloth; it conveys the spirit of the country. Fairness is another value that Australians hold dear.
Then there’s freedom—freedom in many forms. Freedom of life and freedom to live is fundamental. Without that, there is nothing else that’s worth living for. There’s no other freedom. There is also freedom of belief; freedom of thought; freedom of faith; freedom of speech, which has been sadly trampled by both Labor and Liberal parties in the last five years; freedom of association, who I can be friends and mix with; freedom of exchange; freedom of movement and travel; and freedom to live free from government interference. Democracy is another value, as are care for each other, dependability, respect for people—not misinform people—respect for community, respect for the law, respect for environment. Australians value when governments stick to their three core responsibilities—protecting life, protecting property and protecting freedom—and getting the hell out of everything else. Our Constitution is another value that Australians hold dear, competitive federalism. The last one is that human progress and Western civilisation are to be cherished, admired and appreciated.
The ANZ Bank has announced 3,500 job losses across Australia. NAB followed with 300, and Bank of Queensland added another 400.
What is going on?
Since 2000, housing loans have ballooned from around 55% to over 80% of the Big Four banks’ loan books. Mortgage brokers account for 77% of new home loans, meaning fewer bank staff is required. Meanwhile, small business and personal lending has plummeted from 40% to just 18%. As a result, banks have shut down 2,100 branches, abandoning the personal and business lending that once formed the backbone of their service.
Today, Australian banks employ 85,000 people nationally, while nearly 40,000 roles have been outsourced overseas. Total employment has dropped from 166,000 to 124,000 over the past decade. Despite this, bank profits have surged—from $27.5 billion in 2015 to $31.5 billion in 2025.
The latest round of job losses won’t be the last. Banks are racing toward a fully online model of operation, focused to only include asset-secured lending. That means personal loans, unsecured small business loans, and overdrafts for those without property as security will cease to exist entirely.
And yet, the Federal Government continues to support the banks with a guarantee that saves banks $3.5 billion in financing costs.
One Nation believes this public support should come with public benefit. We propose replacing the banking guarantee’s extra profit with a new Banking Code of Practice—one that guarantees face-to-face banking, fair compensation for victims of AFCA bank fraud cases, and a ban on de-banking legitimate businesses.
This would buy time to establish a People’s Bank—a public institution that will restore banking services and jobs to everyday Australians.
Recently in Parliament, Prime Minister Albanese tried to ridicule me, saying “Senator Roberts thinks that build to rent is part of the World Economic Forum’s agenda”‘ before calling it ‘a conspiracy theory. It reminded me of Gandhi’s quote: “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
After One Nation doubled our Senate representation, it seems the PM has moved from ignoring to ridiculing — and in doing so, he engaged in misinformation.
Let’s be clear: the WEF’s push to end single-family homeownership is real. Their “you’ll own nothing and be happy” slogan isn’t a conspiracy—it’s a stated goal. The Albanese government’s nature-positive plan borrows heavily from WEF’s SUB (sustainable urban policy), after meeting with the new WEF co-chair Larry Fink of BlackRock.
Everyday Australians—especially our hardworking farmers—are being ignored while billionaires get the PM’s attention. No wonder he was booed at the Bendigo bush summit and chased out of town by farmers on tractors.
Labor is no longer the party of the worker. It’s the party of predatory billionaires destroying our country for profit, power and control. We’re going to need more tractors.
Transcript
There’s a quote from Gandhi which reads: ‘First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.’ I was reminded of that quote last Thursday when Prime Minister Albanese said of me in the House of Representatives: ‘Senator Roberts thinks that build to rent is part of the World Economic Forum’s agenda’—cue the spooky music— before calling this ‘a conspiracy theory’. Now, I can understand, after One Nation doubled our senators in the last election, why the Prime Minister would feel the need to move from ignore to ridicule. In trying to engage in ridicule, the Prime Minister only managed to engage in misinformation.
The truth is the World Economic Forum opinion leader, who originated their mission statement ‘You’ll own nothing and be happy’, is the same person who used the stage at the annual World Economic Forum meeting in Davos to call for an end to single-family homeownership. Danish politician Ida Auken advanced his idea as part of the West’s sustainable urban policy, or SUB—as in subhuman. SUB is where the Albanese government took the name and many elements of its nature-positive plan, after meeting with the new World Economic Forum co-chair, BlackRock’s Larry Fink. Our Prime Minister should really be better informed on WEF’s evil agenda—or perhaps he is informed.
One thing’s clear: the world’s predatory billionaires have no trouble getting time with our Prime Minister. The people who can’t are everyday Australians, including our hardworking farmers who put food on our table and who we need more than ever to feed the millions of new Labor arrivals—our farmers who contributed $72 billion in exports last year to feed and clothe the world. No wonder the Prime Minister was booed and heckled while on stage at last week’s Bendigo bush summit and then filmed being chased out of town in the company of farmers on tractors.
Labor is no longer the party of the worker. It’s the party of predatory billionaires destroying our country for profit, power and control. We’re going to need more tractors.
One of the most fundamental duties of a senator is to scrutinise the government — not just its words, but its actions. That means asking tough questions about how public money is spent, and demanding transparency when answers are withheld.
Let’s be clear: there is no such thing as “government money.”
Every dollar the government spends comes from taxpayers — from you, from your family, from every working Australian. Yet time and again, ministers dodge this truth. When asked directly, Minister Walsh couldn’t even say the word “taxpayer.” Instead, she danced around the issue, talking about “revenues” and “costed policies.” But the reality remains: it’s your money. And what’s happening with it? Billions of dollars are being funnelled into subsidies and climate schemes with no parliamentary scrutiny.
The government even refused to answer questions about an alleged fund linked to former Prime Minister Julia Gillard. I made no accusations – I just asked questions – yet the government doesn’t want those questions asked. This secrecy is becoming a pattern. Whether it’s Housing Australia or climate targets, Labor refuses to disclose where taxpayer money is going.
Meanwhile, the push for net zero continues — a policy introduced by the Liberals and Nationals – costing Australians billions. There’s no detailed plan, no milestones, no way to measure progress. Even the CSIRO can’t quantify the impact of human carbon dioxide on the climate.
So, what are we paying for? Australians deserve better. We deserve transparency. We deserve respect. And above all, we deserve to know how our hard-earned money is being spent.
https://youtu.be/nWGyg9fpVfk
Transcript
I rise to take note of Minister Ayres’s comment. One of the most fundamental parts of a senator ‘s job is to review and scrutinise the government. That’s why I support almost every single order for the production of documents, regardless of who moves it. Most importantly, scrutinising the government means scrutinising how the government is spending money—and, by the way, scrutinising the impacts of government policy on the national economy and on individual Australians is part of scrutiny of government.
To build back on the first point, scrutinising how the government is spending our money: the government forgets that what it spends isn’t the government’s money; it’s taxpayer money. Minister Walsh recently couldn’t utter the word ‘taxpayers’. I asked her what government money was. She said it is about revenues and that the policy was fully costed. She twisted and turned and gave me several other answers, but she could not utter the words ‘taxpayers’ money’. There is no such thing as government money. It is all taxpayer money. As taxpayers, we all pay taxpayer money. It is Australians’ money.
Last week I spoke in the Senate about Minister Bowen taking subsidies, completely away from parliamentary scrutiny. It was a cosy little deal worth billions of dollars. I mentioned a potential deal with a fund taken over by Julia Gillard, the former Labor prime minister. I made no imputations. I’m just saying we need to have a look at that data. The government is hiding, hiding, hiding and stopping scrutiny, stopping us from doing our jobs, which is a theme for this government. Too often the government is willing to waste hard-earned tax dollars. The minister has just been hauled in front of the Senate to explain because the government refused to answer where they’re spending taxpayer money. This is the second—we’ve just had discussions about Housing Australia—and the government has refused again. This secretive Labor government refuses to tell Australians where it’s spending its taxpayer money. Why the secrecy? Why the hiding? It’s not your money. It’s the Australians’ money. It’s because you don’t want Australians to know that you don’t treat taxpayer money with respect.
Now we come to the second motion that Labor is trying to keep secret, on climate targets. There’s a backstory here that shows how incoherent the Liberals and the Nationals are. The motion is from the Liberal-National coalition asking the government to hand over documents in relation to the Climate Change Authority and their targets. Australians hear all the time that the Liberals and the Nationals want to ditch net zero, yet here’s a motion that the Liberal-National coalition pursues that’s criticising the government for not putting out information on net zero targets. This is insane. It’s almost as insane as the net zero pipedream.
While the Liberals and the Nationals spin their wheels and try to figure out which way the wind is blowing, One Nation is clear. On this motion, One Nation says to the government, we’re not bothered about you handing over your net zero targets. We say, don’t bother pursuing net zero at all. All of these billions of dollars amounting to trillions of dollars and efforts to keep things secret are a waste of time and money. Every minute you spend making climate targets, bogging businesses down in green and blue tape and hamstringing our productive capacity harms the country. Give it up, government, and start putting Australians first.
Remember that the Liberals and the Nationals introduced every major climate and energy policy, including net zero. You did it. That Liberal prime minister Scott Morrison introduced net zero after breaking his election promise to not pursue net zero. What about the government spending trillions on net zero without a detailed project plan—no milestones, no measures of progress, just leading Australia towards an economic cliff blindfolded. Worse, net zero is taking Australia to energy ruin without any policy basis. The CSIRO have never specified—and I’ve asked them repeatedly in personal sessions and in Senate estimates—the specific, quantified effect of human carbon dioxide on the climate. Without that, you can’t have a policy. Thus there’s no basis for policy cutting human carbon dioxide. That’s why there’s no way of measuring the progress of implementing climate and energy policies. That’s why you’ve got to keep it secret. That’s why you’ve got to hide it. I’ll continue my remarks on this topic in the future.
It’s “rumoured” the Labor government are planning to bring hundreds of thousands of Indian workers into Australia on top of the current mass migration crisis.
After days of coverage, this “rumour” has not confirmed nor denied.
Across Australia, construction companies are collapsing due to rising costs. The Treasurer must know that this massive construction plan will drive up the price of building materials even further because of demand.
The result?
More Australian businesses destroyed. More Australian jobs lost.
Transcript
Homelessness in my birthplace, India, is a national scandal. Close to two million people are living on the streets—children, women and the elderly—vulnerable to violence and disease.
Why would the government be discussing bringing hundreds of thousands of Indian labourers and tradesmen here to build one million new homes, financed with a United Arab Emirates loan? Is it a loan or will these be build to rent?
How about India borrows the $500 billion and builds housing in their country, getting their children, women and elderly off the streets? The Indian Minister of Commerce and Industry, Piyush Goyal, told us about this plan and Indian mainstream media confirmed it. After days of coverage, this government has neither confirmed nor denied it. One would think that’s a concession. If you are not planning this, say so. If you are planning it, then admit it and answer our questions, starting with the fact that hundreds of thousands of Indian migrants have to sleep somewhere. Is that what the spare bedroom tax was for—billeting these new migrant workers? If not, then the first two years will be spent building homes for these imported workers who will, no doubt, never leave them. Where does that get us? Are these 200,000 workers on top of the 2.9 million new visa holders the government has let in since 2022 or are they extras?
It’s been four years now, and I understand that less than 10,000 of the 2.9 million you’ve let in are qualified construction workers. That’s 0.3 per cent building houses for the 99.7 per cent. Where are your plans to provide land, building inspectors and trade qualification checks to make sure these homes are built to standard? All over our country construction companies are going broke due to rising costs. The Treasurer must know that this massive construction plan will cause runaway demand inflation in building materials, forcing more of our builders to the wall. All you’ll do is destroy Australian companies and take jobs from Australians. Why do you hate our country?
Australia’s eSafety Commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, recently directed social media companies to take steps to prevent children from altering or falsifying their age to bypass upcoming restrictions for users under 16. This directive is part of the broader implementation of the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024, which requires platforms to enforce age verification and block underage users starting December 10, 2025.
The Commissioner stressed that platforms must identify and remove existing underage accounts (84% of children aged 8 to 12 already use social media, often with parental assistance) and implement “reasonable steps” to prevent new sign-ups or age changes by minors.
This will include multi-layered age assurance technologies, such as facial age estimation, behavioural inference and successive validation – to detect and block attempts by children to lie about their age, or edit profiles post-creation, without relying solely on self-reported birthdates, which can be easily manipulated.
Non-compliance may result in fines of up to AUD 49.5 million per violation, as platforms such as Meta (Facebook and Instagram), TikTok, Snapchat, and others were explicitly required to audit their user bases and redesign onboarding processes to close existing loopholes.
The guidance builds on earlier research from September 2024 showing that only 13% of underage accounts were previously shut down for age violations, highlighting the need to stop children from “changing their age” on profiles to evade detection.
This aligns with the law’s goal to stop social media access until age 16 in order to “protect young users from harms such as cyberbullying and addictive platform features”, while exemptions will apply for non-social platforms like gaming and messaging apps.
After decades of neglect, the Australian flag has found itself at the centre of a patriotic revival.
And what a beautiful sight it is.
Mainstream news publications recoil from our glorious flag as demons from Holy Water – hissing and spitting disingenuous headlines designed to discourage Australians from gathering.
Ignore the press.
Our movement is undeniable.
Australian flags have returned, taking pride of place in grassroots politics – clutched as a dual symbol of love for country and resistance against unjust policy.
The national flag is (very nearly) the last thing Australians have left of the vanishing dream that gave birth to the greatest nation in history.
Our anthem, our history, our institutions, our laws, our statues, our buildings, our businesses, and even Australia Day – our national celebration – these are all being suffocated by the anti-Australian alliance of ‘isms’.
Left-wing ideology has sold us short with ‘multiculturalism’.
The rules of multiculturalism dictate that every culture is to be embraced and celebrated, except the Australian culture, which opened its arms to the world’s people and offered safety, prosperity, and hope.
The Australian culture, denied and derided by some, is the culture that brings people across the ocean to safety.
Our unique culture learned the lessons of its peers and combined all the best parts of Western Civilisation into a nation of freedom, prosperity, and safety.
The Left, meanwhile, have eroded our spirit and brought us to the edge of cultural ruin.
This is not the first time the Left have lost their minds, their humanity, and their national pride. Some of the greatest nations in history have been laid to waste by the Left’s obsession with identity, equity, state supremacy, and control.
Their addiction to purchasing elections with ‘free stuff’, stolen from the pockets of hard-working citizens, is the stuff of nightmares.
It cannot continue.
We will not be divided and destroyed.
We have one flag, we are one community, we are One Nation … and we are taking our country back.
Even if that means reclaiming ground one march at a time.
One policy at a time.
And one politician at a time.
Let us remember, the streets of our capital cities did not mysteriously fill with flag-waving citizens during the March for Australia.
Rivers of Australian flags have been wielded to oppose ‘River to the Sea’ slogans screamed by crowds bearing foreign, and occasionally illegal, flags. Australians can tell the difference between political disagreement and dangerous separatism.
Ordinary people are increasingly frustrated with our peaceful streets being held hostage to Middle Eastern wars. Worse, it has been made clear that political leaders and the courts hold a bias in favour of Palestine protests and against patriotic protests, just as they demonstrated during Covid when ‘health concerns’ only mattered for Freedom rallies, not Black Lives Matter mobs.
Australian marches are not only against foreign causes, they’re about protecting domestic interests.
Have you seen the polls lately? A misguided love of socialism is spreading through younger generations.
Though shocking, it is understandable that so many people in the West have lost faith in democracy and crave some sort of dictatorship. They have seen democracy break and leaders from (what should be) opposing political parties refuse to give the electorate a genuine choice on major issues that threaten to forever change the landscape of Australia.
Why is it that we were given a vote on Gay Marriage, but not Net Zero or Mass Migration?
The latter two impact the lives of every single Australian and yet we know that the private and future profit of politicians and their friends in business depend upon the continuation of Net Zero and mass migration. If taxes have to be raised to unbearable levels, Australian families have nowhere to live, or entire cities lose their character – that’s considered an acceptable sacrifice.
One Nation does not agree. We believe the needs of citizens should be placed above the future earnings of the political elite.
While the Left are nearing the end of their ‘long march’ through our nation, it’s time for the rest of us to march – we must retrace their steps through the institutions, business world, education system, and the streets – to put right what they broke.
To do so, we must protect the Australian flag.
It is our symbol. Our hope. And our figurehead.
It is the silent rallying cry.
The rustling of the changing political winds.
We cannot have the Australian flag burned or desecrated by those who hate our beautiful nation.
The architect of Parliament House, Romaldo Giurgola – an Italian-born migrant – mounted a double-decker-sized Australian flag on an 80 metre flagpole to join together the House of Representatives and the Senate. The flag ties us together while the two houses of government, in turn, hold up the flag.
Anyone who does not look upon the Australian flag with pride has no businesses serving in the Parliament.
To those who deride our flag or replace it with foreign flags, I say this: ‘You are not the Senators for Palestine or China or India. You are not ambassadors for radical Islam or for Blackrock inc.’
Never, in the history of Australia, has government policy so comprehensively abandoned those we represent in favour of those we do not.
We are taking our country back by Senator Malcolm Roberts
https://i0.wp.com/www.malcolmrobertsqld.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/0U1A9763-scaled.jpg?fit=2560%2C1707&ssl=117072560Senator Malcolm Robertshttps://www.malcolmrobertsqld.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/One-Nation-Logo1-300x150.pngSenator Malcolm Roberts2025-09-10 13:26:292025-09-10 13:26:36We Are Taking Our Country Back
https://i0.wp.com/www.malcolmrobertsqld.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Photo3-1.jpg?fit=2048%2C1365&ssl=113652048Senator Malcolm Robertshttps://www.malcolmrobertsqld.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/One-Nation-Logo1-300x150.pngSenator Malcolm Roberts2025-09-04 22:26:422025-09-10 12:59:37March for Australia
One Nation moved to establish a Senate inquiry into the program of mass immigration.
On Monday 1 September, I asked the Australian Senate to establish an inquiry into the impact of immigration on our economy.
The Australian public and the government must be properly informed about the data and the impacts of this policy. Without that, there can be no genuine policy debate or discussion.
That’s why we want to establish this inquiry, to take the emotion out of the debate and deal with the facts and data.
See the Senators who voted NO to our inquiry 👇 Almost all Liberals, Labor and Greens teamed up to block the inquiry.
Live Debate: 1 hr 16 mins.
Motion Defeated – 37 to 9
Number of Temporary Visa Holders in Australia
Mainstream media is out there gaslighting Australia, telling us that immigration is going down.
Can anyone point to the part of the graph where we aren’t currently at record migration levels?
Source: Number of Temporary Visa Holders in Australia, Department of Home Affairs.
