I understand that many Australians are deeply concerned about protecting our country’s sovereignty, especially when it comes to public health decisions. One Nation firmly opposes surrendering Australia’s sovereignty to unelected global bodies like the United Nation and WHO. No international organisation should have the power to impose lockdowns or medical procedures on Australians. The WHO has proven it cannot be trusted with our national interests and Australia must exit and protect its sovereignty.
To clarify where things currently stand, the WHO Pandemic Agreement was adopted by the World Health Assembly in May 2025 and signed by Australia’s Health Minister Mark Butler. However, it’s important to note that this agreement hasn’t been ratified yet. For it to take effect, both houses of Parliament must assent to it.
Any international treaty, including this one, must go through Australia’s formal treaty-making process. That includes review by the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties. This committee will resume when Parliament returns later in July. Even once ratified, formal legislation must still be passed by Parliament to give effect to any elements of the agreement. I encourage you not to worry about any dates being circulated right now. No legislation has been passed, and we’re keeping a close eye on any developments. If anything changes, I’ll be sure to keep you updated.
One Nation supports full parliamentary debate and formal votes on any treaty, and will work to ensure this occurs in this case as well.
Watch my latest video on the WHO Treaty, which was prepared for an international summit – Reject the WHO and the Globalist Coup!
Transcript
In May of 2021, the United Nations World Health Organisation released a report titled COVID-19 Make it the Last Pandemic. The report called for closer cooperation between nations and more power. More power for a World Health Organisation to coordinate and initiate that collaboration.
In December 2021, the UN World Health Organisation held a special assembly to consider a proposal for a pandemic treaty to give effect to their report. The proposal from the United Nations was a nefarious document. It proposed turning the World Health Organisation into the World Health Police, with powers to compel member nations to comply with any directive from the WHO. This could include forced vaccinations, forced medical procedures, lockdowns, border and national closures, business closures, school closures, and the spending of huge sums of money on medical countermeasures.
Those provisions were not a conspiracy theory. The proposal actually said in plain English, the WHO should have the power to force medical procedures on citizens in member nations. It allowed the Director General of WHO to declare a pandemic at any time for any reason, meaning the world would forever be under a pandemic order and the WHO would forever be able to order these horrible anti human measures.
Fortunately, the 2021 Special Assembly failed to reach an agreement when a block of 42 African nations opposed the proposal. Having been used for decades as a testing ground for disease and vaccine research coming at a huge cost in African lives, these nations were not signing up for more deaths.
The outcome of the World Health Assembly in 2021 was to set in place a three year time frame for a pandemic agreement to be developed. A committee of WHO luminaries was set up to review the proposal. These were many of the world’s leading health experts who had worked with The WHO for many years. Their wisdom shone through and they tore the proposed treaty to shreds, stating it would destroy support for the WHO.
Their staff did not want to become the World Health Police, they just want to work on improving health in underdeveloped member to countries.
In the end, that’s what prevailed.
Multiple new drafts were produced across three years and given to a steering committee to test support and each time failing to get the numbers. A new version followed, which further watered down the compulsion and the destruction of national and personal sovereignty. A final version, a consensus document, was produced and passed at the World Health Assembly in May this year.
Gone were 50 pages of nefarious provisions. Nothing that gave the WHO powers of compulsion has survived from the original version. This agreement contains no compulsion on member states. Wherever the wording says a member state shall it’s always followed by a modifier, such as subject to national laws, having mined to national sovereignty, subject to financial resources and so on. There are no binding provisions in this agreement beyond the need to advise the Who when a disease outbreak occurs that may be of national or international significance. Which is a good idea! After all, China sat on COVID for months in 2019 to give the billionaires time to hold event 201 and to craft a response that maximise their financial benefit. A response which caused untold suffering and deaths around the world using fraudulent science, mass propaganda and military coercion.
A deadly response which was not designed to minimise suffering. Instead, the response was designed to maximise the transfer of wealth from everyday citizens to the world’s predatory billionaires.
For complete clarity, this document’s latest version is not what people are saying it is. There’s no loss of Australian sovereignty and no new powers for the World Health Organisation. No new powers that can be forced on a member state.
Our political party, One Nation, of course opposes the pandemic agreement and the changes to the International Health Regulations that implement the provisions of the agreement for the simple reason we do not accept there is a role in the world for these unelected, unaccountable anti human bureaucrats.
This has always been One Nation policy.
In my first Senate speech in 2016, I called for an AUS Exit Australia to exit the UN and in April 2022, thanks to my diligent and knowledgeable staff team, I was the first Australian politician to oppose the pandemic treaty.
AUS exit is necessary because the UN and their agencies, including The WHO, have been hopelessly compromised by the world’s parasitic, indeed predatory, billionaires.
The WHO now gets most of its funding from entities tied to pharmaceutical companies. In return, the WHO mandates those companies medical products. It’s classic crony capitalism. Naked wealth transfer from the people. It’s theft.
By centralising power in the hands of unelected foreign bureaucrats, we’ve made the buyout of the UN easier. All the people they need to compromise to become the de facto owners of the world are in the one spot pretending to act on our behalf while actually lining the pockets of their billionaire parasitic benefactors.
These people are not the good guys. These people are your prospective owners. Make no mistake, our health authorities and their politicians have signed up to this agenda.
In the next pandemic, they will do the same nefarious, destructive, murderous policies again, and this time they will say the WHO made us do it.
Well, the truth is that the WHO is not making anyone do anything. These people are choosing to behave like this because it’s good for their power, their egos and their careers. The UN and its agencies are in darkness and cannot be saved.
One Nation calls for a withdrawal from the World Health Organisation, from the United Nations, from the World Economic Forum and from the World Bank.
Thank you.
I wish you a successful conference.





Thank you Sen ,,,, Malcolm , One Nation are the gate keepers for good over evil unlike the diseased Labor and Liberals .
Keep up the good work 😜
WHO is just a front for the eugenics elite who are happy to take ALL our resources but care little about the inconvenience of a population that consumes the resources they believe they have every right to take to build their “utopian” world on your funeral pire.
Australia is the last Utopia on the planet and Beijing got their eyes on it . The plan is to take pacific regional countries to get to us provided we don’t have an alliance with the US that is , this is where Albanese comes in ,,,,,! Compliant , Timid , Agreeable. , Yes man and handsome boy when it comes to dealing with China , but back in Australia where he’s the king pin is really where he flexes his power harassing dominance over the Australian public. . Xu Jing pong could be sitting in Canberra in 10 years 🤔
I feel vindicated in voting for One Nation last election and I plan to vote for you again next time. Thank you for your hard work.💐
This is the disgracefully disappointing / disturbing but expected response to my Extremely Strenuous call for Rejection of the amendments to the 2024 International Health Regulations (as per the Aligned Council of Australia).
From >
France, Ali (MP Office)
Mon, Jul 14, 11:20 AM (6 days ago)
Dear Diane
Thank you for contacting Ali France, Member for Dickson.
The World Health Organization (WHO) Pandemic Agreement is aimed at strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response.
Signing a new international agreement and the targeted changes to the International Health Regulations (IHR) may create new international legal obligations for Australia. However, this will not automatically change Australian law.
The Agreement takes onboard the lessons learnt during the COVID-19 pandemic and supports collective action to address pandemic threats, including by strengthening multi-sectoral disease surveillance and access to vaccines.
While the Agreement has been adopted by the World Health Assembly, there are further steps remaining to finalise technical details. Australia will only commence our treaty making process after the Agreement opens for signature, which is not expected until at least mid-2026.
Once the Agreement has entered into force, Australia and our region will be better positioned to reduce pandemic risks and respond swiftly if a pandemic occurs, saving lives and mitigating the impacts on our economies. Australia will retain full sovereignty in making public health decisions which promote the interests of Australians.
The WHO and Australia have a strong, long-standing partnership spanning more than 70 years. During this time, the sharing of expertise across a wide range of health issues has helped make the Indo-Pacific region, and beyond, healthier, and safer.
Taking part in these reforms helps to protect the health and wellbeing of Australians.
Australia will continue to participate in discussions to help achieve the best possible outcome and ensure Australian interests are advanced.
Thank you again for taking the time to provide your feedback on this matter. If you require further assistance, please email Ali at ali.france.mp@aph.gov.au
Kind regards etc…..