The Morrison-Joyce government’s recent fuel excise reduction creating a 22c per litre drop in petrol and diesel prices, is now shown to be a deceitful marketing tactic.
Senator Roberts said, “The devil in the detail is that the Morrison-Joyce government reduced the amount of excise that road transport operators could claim back against their tax, meaning that despite the 22c drop road transport operators only received a 4c per litre reduction.
“The Prime Minister has perfected the sleight of hand; he gives with one hand and takes with the other.”
Road transport is the primary method of transport for non-bulk freight in Australia and is an essential part of the supply chain for many industries, delivering food, clothing and household goods.
Senator Roberts added, “These high fuel prices feed directly into the prices Australians pay at the supermarket. Only yesterday Independent Research firm Morningstar revealed prices in Coles and Woolworths have risen by 4% in just 3 months.
“One Nation lobbied the Morrison Government very strongly this month to get this fuel excise reduction, but we did not expect this short-sighted deceitful con and clawback.
“The money Australians are saving at the fuel bowser with a 22c reduction, will now be spent at the grocery store checkout over the next few months.
“The Morrison-Joyce government excels at deceptive gift giving and I encourage all Australians to punish his insincerity at the next election and to put the major parties last.”
When I started researching election integrity I was doing it to show that our elections are secure. That is not what I found. There is no requirement to audit the results and no ID requirements to ensure there is no double voting. Our electoral legislation is full of holes. My bill seeks to fix those holes using audits that many well researched committees, agencies and investigations have already suggested. There really isn’t much reason to vote against it.
Transcript
As a servant to the people of Queensland and Australia I present the the Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Integrity of Elections) Bill 2021, which amends the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918.
This bill provides for the routine auditing of the electronic component of Australian federal elections and for the provision of voter identification.
It should also be noted that this bill does not look backward to previous elections, but rather forward to ensure confidence in the next election.
During COVID the actions of unelected bureaucrats and incompetent politicians has wiped out small businesses and jobs, disrupted lives and reduced many people to desperation.
The next election will be a powder keg.
It is essential to ensure that Australians can accept the result and move on.
Suspicion of the outcome can be easily fueled, especially on social media, and turned into violence by those who seek to manipulate the result for their own ends.
The level of trust in the result must be commensurate with the current heightened level of risk.
When I started researching election integrity it was to show that our elections are secure. That is not what I found.
The Australian National Audit Office conducted three audits into the 2013 federal election. Their final report came out in 2016. This is what ANAO said about the Australian Electoral Commission (the AEC):
In 2014 the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters wrote to the Auditor General seeking a performance audit focusing on the adequacy of the Australian Electoral Commission implementation of recommendations arising from earlier ANAO audits of the AEC.
The Auditor General decided to conduct 3 related performance audits.
All three reports found that the AEC had not adequately and effectively implemented the earlier ANAO recommendations. The reports concluded that in order to protect the integrity of the Australian electoral system and rebuild confidence in the AEC these recommendations should be implemented.
“ANAO plans to undertake a follow-up audit following the next federal election, in 2016, to examine the adequacy and effectiveness of the AEC’s implementation of the ten recommendations made by ANAO across three reports.”
“the AEC must develop a strategy for deeper reform to ensure and demonstrate integrity in all aspects of the election, including a fundamental overhaul of the AEC’s policies and procedures to restore confidence in the electoral process”.
Let me say that again – a fundamental overhaul to ensure election integrity.
Mr President the follow-up audit to test how well the AEC implemented this fundamental review into election integrity never occurred.
Perhaps someone should do a bill to bring on that audit. Oh wait Mr President, I did.
Were ANAO happy for this direction – apparently not.
In their submission to this bill ANAO said my bill was not necessary as they had the power to audit the AEC at any time.
If that is the case then they should get on with it.
Mr President New South Wales and Western Australia have provisions in their electoral acts to audit state elections.
New South Wales conducts an audit before each election to ensure systems are fit for purpose and then audits again after each election to ensure integrity, and to see what can be improved for next time.
Western Australia audits after every election.
There is no audit function currently specified in the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918.
This bill creates a function for the Auditor General to audit the operation of the AEC twice in each election cycle:
In the lead up to the election; and
From polling day to the declaration of the poll.
The audit provided for in this bill covers electronic measures, and tests if:
“the use of authorised technology produces the same result as would be obtained without the use of authorised technology.”
Put simply this is asking the Auditor General to ensure that the use of computerised voter rolls, tallying, preference allocations and related matters produced a result that accurately reflects the will of the people.
ANAO felt that was too high a bar to meet, I would consider ensuring the will of the people was accurately reflected in the result was the bare minimum for any election audit.
This bill does not specify what will be audited. The decision regarding the operation of the audit is best left to the agencies conducting the audit.
Secondly, this bill authorises the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) to audit and monitor computer systems for unauthorised access internally and externally.
This is targeting both unauthorised access from within the system and unauthorised external access by malicious entities.
The Australia Signals Directorate is currently conducting a cyber “uplift program” at the Australian Electoral Commission. While the program is most welcome, there is no basis in the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 or the Intelligence Services Act 2001 for that program.
This bill brings legislation into line with current practice.
Mr President In May Senate estimates I asked the Australian Electoral Commission simple questions regarding their auditing. I was assured that audits are occurring. On no occasion then or since have the following questions been answered:
Who conducted the audit?
When was the audit conducted?
What was audited?
What was the result?
Have any changes been made as a result of the audit?
It is disturbing that such an audit could happen behind closed doors without direction or structure. It is more disturbing that this program has no legal basis in the Commonwealth Electoral Act.
We should not have to rely on the admirable conscientiousness of the Australian Signals Directorate. We should be able to rely on the completeness of our legislation.
Mr President I also looked at other issues around election integrity.
First up was a simple question: At the Senate Scanning Centre is the electronic data file containing each vote ever compared back to the paper ballot after the vote has been adjudicated?
That answer is no. At no time is the electronic record of a vote checked back against the paper ballot once the ballot is adjudicated.
Some disputed votes are held back and adjudicated later in the counting process, then filed away.
There is no routine sampling beyond that point. That is not acceptable.
The third part of my bill is for voter ID. Most of the recommendations in the ANAO report, that was never followed up, went to failures in the integrity of voter rolls.
It is too late to go back now and audit those rolls before the next election, by way of re-commencing residency checks, as ANAO recommended.
It is not too late for a quick fix – which is voter ID. Asking for simple identification will act as an audit on the rolls in real time, and ensure every vote cast was legitimate.
This is not my idea. Recommendation 21 of the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters Inquiry into the 2019 Federal Election called for voter identification to be introduced. This same finding was made in 2016 and 2013.
Schedule 2 of this bill is drafted to give effect to the committee recommendation as literally as possible.
Voters must present a form of acceptable identification to be issued with an ordinary pre-poll or election day vote. Authorised identification must be suitably broad so as to not actively prevent electors from casting an ordinary ballot.
This bill allows a wide range of acceptable voter ID. The AEC is empowered to make further regulations to ensure voters are not disenfranchised.
The AEC noted in their submission to the JSCEM inquiry that:
“multiple voting is frequently the subject of media commentary and social media speculation. Such a degree of focus is entirely understandable: there can hardly be a more emblematic component of trust in electoral results than ensuring eligible voters only exercise the franchise [appropriately].”
Multiple voting is a red herring in this debate. My bill is not concerned with multiple voting, it is concerned with ensuring every vote cast was made according to law.
The Commonwealth Electoral Act (Integrity of Elections Bill) 2021 is about protecting confidence in our elections.
The cyber integrity of our elections and the use of voter identification is essential to that confidence.
I recommend the Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Integrity of Elections) Bill 2021 to the Senate.
Let’s kick Labor out of Bundamba at this Saturday’s by-election.
Here’s why.
Transcript
There’s a by-election for the state, Queensland state seat of Bundamba this coming Saturday, the 28th of March. And there’ll be pre-poll every day leading up to that at five particular booths.
For those who don’t know in Bundamba, the Labor Party has a commitment to make Ipswich into Tipswich, with massive, new incinerators, massive new dumps, super dumps.
One Nation’s Sharon Bell, candidate, opposes that. Labor’s electricity gouging has really hurt Queensland families and individuals and businesses.
It’s exported jobs overseas to foreign countries which burn our coal at a far cheaper rate because they don’t have the government impost and the subsidies for stupid intermittent energies like solar and wind.
So you’re paying for this green fantasy that Annastacia Palaszczuk is driving and taking money out of family wallets, taking jobs out of Ipswich and Bundamba. Sharon Bell will fight to reverse that.
And then the corruption. Everyone knows about the corruption in Ipswich. Labour Council for many years and Jo-Ann Miller was the previous member of Bundamba and she fought very hard to remove that corruption, to expose it.
She spent 16 years and they bullied her and intimidated her. So Labour, is the bulliers. Make sure that people in Bundamba vote to end the corruption in Queensland that extends from Ipswich right through to the Queensland state parliament.
Jo-Ann Miller did her best. She’s fiesty, she’s strong, she’s honest, she’s courageous. But they belted at her. And now, to replace Jo-Ann Miller, Labour is putting up a candidate that is a blow in from Melbourne.
He’s only arrived in the state a few months ago and he was put onto a job, paid more than $200,000 a year on a government agency. How’s that? He’s in favour of the dumps.
He’s not gonna be doing anything about the corruption because he won’t know where to start. And he’s not gonna stop electricity price gouging. Sharon, though, Sharon is just like Jo-Ann.
Fiesty, honest, strong. She listens and like Jo-Ann, she will expose the corruption and she will get stuck into the basic issues for Bundamba. She’ll make sure that we don’t have any more privatisation on her watch.
She’ll make sure that privatisation, by the way from both Liberal and Labour. She’ll make sure, as a mother of three, that she pursues basic education, restoring education standards.
No more political correctness with Sharon Bell. A basic down-to-earth person. So on Saturday and in the pre-polling, make your vote count. Sharon Bell, number one for Bundamba.
And make sure to make your vote count, that it’s formal, that you put two, three, and four in the other boxes. Put ’em in any order you like because you’re the owner of the preferences.
So if you liked Jo-Ann Miller, vote Sharon Bell, number one for Bundamba. If you like Bundamba and its people, vote Sharon Bell for Bundamba. She lives there. She knows the issues. And if you love Australia, vote Sharon Bell, one for Bundamba.
