This report provides a summary of the discussions and transcripts from meetings with CSIRO. Additional links in the References section give an in-depth appreciation of analysis of the evidence provided by CSIRO. In the context of seeking CSIRO’s empirical evidence to justify climate policies, I know that CSIRO:
- has never stated that carbon dioxide from human activity is dangerous.
- admitted that temperatures today are not unprecedented.
- withdrew discredited papers that it had cited as evidence of unprecedented rate of temperature change and then failed to provide supporting empirical evidence.
- has never quantified any specific impact of carbon dioxide from human activity.
- relies upon unvalidated models that give unverified and erroneous projections as “evidence.”
- relied on discredited and poor quality papers on temperature and carbon dioxide.
- admits to not doing due diligence on reports and data from external agencies.
- revealed little understanding of papers it cited as evidence.
- allows politicians and journalists to misrepresent CSIRO science without correction.
- misled parliament.
Seventeen internationally respected climate scientists from Australia and five other nations verified our conclusions about CSIRO.
In conclusion, CSIRO’s science on the matter of climate for policy making, amounts to a gross misleading of Parliament. The onus of proof is now on Parliament to provide the empirical scientific evidence proving that carbon dioxide from human activity needs to be cut, and until that is provided, government must immediately stop wasting billions of dollars on climate policies.
