My copy arrived on Monday, and I am deciding whether to keep it or gift it to my son, who loves all things military. Or read it and give to him afterwards.

Senator Malcolm Roberts I am planning on getting this book. I have heard a lot about it!

Did you have some one read it to you and explain the big words

If anything's given it the kiss of death, that has ...

Methamphetamine Mal definitely needed it rewritten in crayons.

"𝘐𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘶𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘷𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘦𝘴, 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘴; 𝘪𝘧 𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘺 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴, 𝘱𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘰𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘺 𝘧𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘴." — 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗠𝗮𝘂𝗿𝗿𝗮𝘀, 𝘔𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘥𝘦́𝘦𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘴, 𝘦𝘥. 𝘗𝘪𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘦 𝘊𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘰𝘯 (𝘗𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘴: 𝘈𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘦̀𝘮𝘦 𝘍𝘢𝘺𝘢𝘳𝘥, 1937). 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯: '𝘔𝘺 𝘗𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘐𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘴' (𝘈𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘰𝘱𝘦 𝘏𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘗𝘶𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨, 2021). #AntiParliamentarianism #Plutocracy #Money

It’s the little Indian 🇮🇳

Just noticed we can purchase the book at BIG W for $24.00 or Booktopia for $24.00

Well done for reading this book.. 📕 I am sure albosleezy and labor won’t read it !

Retire Malcolm

Got ours today, hubby hasn’t put it down

Senator Malcolm Roberts

Is he the bloke who thinks covid deaths were staged?

Is it a picture book? Because that's about all you would be capable of reading... 😜🤪

👏👏👏👏👏👏👏. Most of Australia citizens are christians what we call the Body of Christ. Australia is not a muslim country. If Australia citizens want to obey muslim or sharia laws. Then they have no room in Australia. The minority of citizens will not dominate fully democratic laws of our great nation- Australia. And Australia politicians should be fully aware of this. Need change in Australia citizenship laws. End of story. 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 NOTE: This is a 100% deception or created lie by few media outlets or few citizens. " A survey or census has been conducted thoroughly thoroughout the whole Australia. About different faith believers. It is all for political benefits ". It is bad for our great country. And it is going to get worse! - wake up Australia. We are living in the erra of 🔥POWER OF MONEY!!!. 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆

You are part of our Core problem 

Malcolm can read????

Vote Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party

"𝘐𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘶𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘷𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘦𝘴, 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘴; 𝘪𝘧 𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘺 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴, 𝘱𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘰𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘺 𝘧𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘴." — 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗠𝗮𝘂𝗿𝗿𝗮𝘀, 𝘔𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘥𝘦́𝘦𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘴, 𝘦𝘥. 𝘗𝘪𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘦 𝘊𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘰𝘯 (𝘗𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘴: 𝘈𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘦̀𝘮𝘦 𝘍𝘢𝘺𝘢𝘳𝘥, 1937). 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯: '𝘔𝘺 𝘗𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘐𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘴' (𝘈𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘰𝘱𝘦 𝘏𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘗𝘶𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨, 2021). #AntiParliamentarianism #Plutocracy #Money

This is just rediculous. Clearly that book has far too many pages for the average ON supporter to read. And everyone knows the Afghan war was staged.

MASS NON COMPLIANCE NOW

Lil’ Cooker Malcolm holding a book.

This book rocks too

👌😜❤️

A comment from Catherine: More to the point. Trans women aren't women. They're trans women 🎯

what do you expect when mental illness is normalized

About 1.7% of the population have “mismatched” chromosomes, hormones or genitalia, is the implication of this post that those people have a psychological disorder? Just more scientifically illiterate hateful nonsense from a desperate bunch of morons, support for one notion is clearly the most common mental deficiency in this country at present. Absolutely disgraceful.

No..they are men in dresses not trans women

How is this even controversial ? What’s happening in the world, I know bloke like you Senator Malcolm Roberts know the amazing Australia that was. Why do we have to fight to have that kept alive. It was amazing, lots from different backgrounds, no marches, no bridge takeovers, no terrorists. What in gods name is happening?

Usual One Nation hatred

More to the point. Trans women aren't women. They're trans women

I'm superman and I can fly. You all have to support my belief in this.

So is supporting one nation

And yet some people are neither XX nor XY. What is your explanation for that

Actually when the egg is fertilized, there all female when the tail drops off it becomes male interesting.

Sex and gender are different concepts. Easiest idea in the universe to grasp.

My thing is that I accept there are some people who struggle with their identity. I know people who have had sex changes and people who were born with both male and female genes (they are both male and female but with only male genitalia). What I do t accept is that the majority should see the world from their perspective… I just think we should use some of the wisdom other cultures have been using for centuries and have a 3rd sex that includes everyone who doesn’t fall under male and female. By all means, fight over what to call it but let’s be clear it’s not one of the other two 🤷‍♀️

I never agree with anyone's delusions. I may respect their right to have them, but it is their delusion, not mine.

"𝘈𝘯𝘺 𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘺𝘪𝘦𝘭𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺 𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘥𝘳𝘢𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦. 𝘏𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘴, 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘴; 𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵, 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘴 𝘩𝘪𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘯 𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵." — 𝗚𝗲𝗼𝗿𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝗦𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗹, 𝘙𝘦́𝘧𝘭𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘳 𝘭𝘢 𝘷𝘪𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 (𝘗𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘴: 𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘭 𝘙𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘦̀𝘳𝘦, 1908). 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯: '𝘙𝘦𝘧𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘝𝘪𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦' (𝘓𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘯: 𝘎𝘦𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘦 𝘈𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘯 & 𝘜𝘯𝘸𝘪𝘯, 1915). #Resistance #Violence #PoliticalAction #Duty

𝐑𝐞𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐜𝐚 𝐇𝐞𝐥𝐦, 𝐚 𝐛𝐢𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐫 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐍𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐚, 𝐀𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐞 𝐔𝐒 𝐰𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐬: Friendly neighborhood biologist here. I see a lot of people are talking about biological sexes and gender right now. Lots of folks make biological sex sex seem really simple. Well, since it’s so simple, let’s find the biological roots, shall we? Let’s talk about sex...[a thread] If you know a bit about biology you will probably say that biological sex is caused by chromosomes, XX and you’re female, XY and you’re male. This is “chromosomal sex” but is it “biological sex”? Well... Turns out there is only ONE GENE on the Y chromosome that really matters to sex. It’s called the SRY gene. During human embryonic development the SRY protein turns on male-associated genes. Having an SRY gene makes you “genetically male”. But is this “biological sex”? Sometimes that SRY gene pops off the Y chromosome and over to an X chromosome. Surprise! So now you’ve got an X with an SRY and a Y without an SRY. What does this mean? A Y with no SRY means physically you’re female, chromosomally you’re male (XY) and genetically you’re female (no SRY). An X with an SRY means you’re physically male, chromsomally female (XX) and genetically male (SRY). But biological sex is simple! There must be another answer... Sex-related genes ultimately turn on hormones in specifics areas on the body, and reception of those hormones by cells throughout the body. Is this the root of “biological sex”?? “Hormonal male” means you produce ‘normal’ levels of male-associated hormones. Except some percentage of females will have higher levels of ‘male’ hormones than some percentage of males. Ditto ditto ‘female’ hormones. And... ...if you’re developing, your body may not produce enough hormones for your genetic sex. Leading you to be genetically male or female, chromosomally male or female, hormonally non-binary, and physically non-binary. Well, except cells have something to say about this... Maybe cells are the answer to “biological sex”?? Right?? Cells have receptors that “hear” the signal from sex hormones. But sometimes those receptors don’t work. Like a mobile phone that’s on “do not disturb’. Call and cell, they will not answer. What does this all mean? It means you may be genetically male or female, chromosomally male or female, hormonally male/female/non-binary, with cells that may or may not hear the male/female/non-binary call, and all this leading to a body that can be male/non-binary/female. Try out some combinations for yourself. Notice how confusing it gets? Can you point to what the absolute cause of biological sex is? Is it fair to judge people by it? Of course you could try appealing to the numbers. “Most people are either male or female” you say. Except that as a biologist professor I will tell you... The reason I don’t have my students look at their own chromosome in class is because people could learn that their chromosomal sex doesn’t match their physical sex, and learning that in the middle of a 10-point assignment is JUST NOT THE TIME. Biological sex is complicated. Before you discriminate against someone on the basis of “biological sex” & identity, ask yourself: have you seen YOUR chromosomes? Do you know the genes of the people you love? The hormones of the people you work with? The state of their cells? Since the answer will obviously be no, please be kind, respect people’s right to tell you who they are, and remember that you don’t have all the answers. Again: biology is complicated. Kindness and respect don’t have to be. Note: Biological classifications exist. XX, XY, XXY XXYY and all manner of variation which is why sex isn't classified as binary. You can't have a binary classification system with more than two configurations even if two of those configurations are more common than others. Biology is a shitshow. Be kind to people.

During the time of Covid, The World Health Organization (WHO) were dealing with Covid, changed the IDC11 policy on Gender incongruence. They removed it from the mandatory mental health category and reclassified it into the general sexual health category. The change in policy classification meant it could be included in school curriculum. It removed /bypassed automatic psychiatric assessment pathways so that patients could access medical treatment very easily without mandatory any automatic psychiatric pathways/assessment. You may want to look up how this new policy reclassification changed childrens rights and bodily autonomy, under the UN convention of the rights of a child. ( If parents do not agree ) It’s amazing the WHO had time to prioritize this policy during a so called global pandemic.

I see the little Goblin is hard at work. 🐈

Not true, there's also religion.

This issue doesn’t affect me, but not being able to afford a home or food is on my mind. This obsession also could be framed as a symptom of not being mentally well.

Religion sounds similar to me

Actually their are many instances where adopting or accepting their world view is the best practice. Read a book Malcolm.

Refreshing

Eventually most people will own an EV though, so this will be considered public infrastructure.

Everyone is either buying or about to buy EVs, so the charging infrastructure benefits everyone.

Because you have such a grip on reality Malcolm. I think I will fact check this.

we all pay for things we don’t use, I don’t use kids playgrounds but am happy to help fund them.

Wealthy ev owners 😂. Second hand Tesla's are 20-30k. I just bought one and I'm far from "wealthy"

$10 million is that all - that’s like Pauline’s travel budget for 1 year

I don’t catch public transport, so why should I fund it?

What is an EV power station?

Just practice that bulldozer noise for Gina Reinhardt...🚜 Brrrrrr.......Brrrrr.... 😂.

And the AI centres

As opposed to AI data centres which do the same thing to the energy grid but offers poor people the ability to generate a picture of Micky mouse kissing sonic the hedgehog

'could be' hehe

In the 5 hours it took you to write this pathetic post, the Australian fossil fuel industry received ~$10 million in subsidies. Can must allocate it to energy security and energy independence by encouraging EVs, chargers, and smarter choices.

Yes, the energy transition is a kind of wealth distribution. Away from countries lucky enough to sit on oil towards countries willing to do the work. Yes, in the beginning some investment will be needed.

The obvious answer here is to put a charge (say $500) on every purchase of an EV vehicle that pays for the EV infrastructure.

Capitalism is a wealth distribution system but you don't criticise thst

Less than a buck per taxpayer, sounds good to me. Oil is running out fast.

"could be added" Where is this information coming from?

$10 million dollars over what timeframe? Per year? If it’s per year, then what a joke of a gripe this is. Spread across the approximately 10 million households in Australia, this is about $1 per household to build infrastructure which will help to insulate our personal and goods transport nationwide from the extreme insecurity which exists in liquid fuel supply lines. Sounds like a bloody bargain to me. Even if it’s $10 million per quarter, that’s $4 per household per year. Still a bloody bargain. Everyone benefits from EV adoption, either indirectly due to reduced demand for liquid fuels which ICEV owners need, or directly through better access to charging for EV owners.

I'm an ev owner and not wealthy. Happy to pay but how about making gas cheap also so I can heat my home

Been watching Malcolm being dissed on Sky News by commentators as a conspiracy theorist, saying Pauline & especially Barnaby struggling to clear up Malcolm's mess. Personally I agree with everything Malcolm has claimed & if he's ditched by ON half their base would leave.

Electric cars are even now cheaper than petrol cars. Plus lower running and maintenance costs

Hi, whats your stance on the energy consumption of Data centres? Should the taxpayer pay more for power to support them?

Pay pay pay tax tax tax on borrowed money