Patients First – Not Profits or Mandates

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

✅ 100% agree!

Sourced from Secretary Kennedy on X @SecKennedy:

Medical decisions should be made based on one thing: the wellbeing of the person—never on a financial bonus or a government mandate.

Doctors deserve the freedom to use their training, follow the science, and speak the truth without fear of punishment.

/3 Comments/by
You might also like
Truckies and Protests – 2SM with Marcus Paul
Australia Resists Mesh Ban Despite International Restrictions Australia Resists Mesh Ban Despite International Restrictions
Global Health Emergency or Corporate Payday? Global Health Emergency or Corporate Payday?
When Care Turns Into Exploitation When Care Turns Into Exploitation
Inquiry into the COVID Vaccine Discrimination Bill
Truth Wins: Vaccine Mandates Were Unlawful Truth Wins: Vaccine Mandates Were Unlawful
3 replies
  1. Christy
    Christy says:

    Under AHPRA and the state bodies such as VCAT, healthcare practitioners are not only severely stunted in their ability to exercise their clinical judgement, but they are now being hunted down for their private social media use and suspended, if not de-registered entirely, for their political and religious beliefs (shared privately) due to ‘misconduct’ via a complaints systems weaponised by ideological insiders – see the case of Dr Jereth Kim. The woke administration, and often times nurses, hide behind privacy policies and the doctors who take on the actual liability for patient’s outcomes no longer have any clinical ‘power’ or protection, picking them off (particularly the ‘old white guys’) one by one – do the demise of the Australian public.

  2. Diane Drayton Buckland
    Diane Drayton Buckland says:

    The International Medical Council on Vaccination
    is an association of medical doctors, registered nurses and other qualified medical professionals whose purpose is to counter the messages asserted by pharmaceutical companies, the government and medical agencies that vaccines are safe, effective and harmless.
    Our conclusions have been reached individually by each member of the Council, after thousands of hours of personal research, study and observation.
    Principles and Findings
    We are profoundly critical of the practice of vaccination.
    Vaccination is an unacceptable risk to every member of society, regardless of age.
    As medical professionals, Council members have observed first-hand the health of vaccinated vs. the unvaccinated. We find the latter group to be robust, healthy and drug-free compared to the former group.
    We have reviewed published studies in support of vaccines and have found them wanting in both substance and science.
    We have brought out into the open hundreds of peer-reviewed, published medical articles that document the damage and the diseases caused by vaccines.
    We find the premise of herd immunity to be a faulty theory.
    We encourage intelligent debate about vaccination.
    We expect individuals to take responsibility for their health and the health of their children by investigating the problems due to vaccination prior to subjecting their children, or themselves, to this medical procedure.
    We believe that refusing vaccination is a personal right that should be legislatively guaranteed.

  3. Diane Drayton Buckland
    Diane Drayton Buckland says:

    Medicine’s Most Sacred Oaths >
    Individual Rights to Fully Informed Consent OR REFUSAL of Medical Treatment as per Nuremberg Code / Principles.

    FIRST DO NO HARM.

    NO MANDATES EVER should have been enacted by anyone, anywhere, anytime for anything.

    ALL PEOPLE, QUESTION EVERYTHING.

Comments are closed.