THANKS TO BLOODY LABOR .

As planned.

Is anyone better off with socialist Labor?

The new world order plan

I don’t think Australia will survive another two years of Labor.

Theft that’s what it is

Just imagine how much impact electricty prices will have on future transport costs. Need to get the electricity generation right and not rely on fossil fuels which are subject to manipulation by cartels of uber wealth.

Get rid of gst for pensioners and I will vote for you forever

And gst will be the big pay off for the government

Elections have consequences

Malcolm wants you to believe withdrawing from the Paris 'Agreement' will bring your bills down. He's relying on some of you believing it. Don't. It's BS

Waiting for Malcolm's outrage over energy privatisation. Tumbleweeds~ "The privatisation of ETSA by the Liberal Olsen government delivered higher energy prices—that is a fact—and South Australians have paid dearly for that appalling failure of leadership from that ill-fated Liberal government. Research from the Australia Institute in 2019 found that 40 per cent of South Australians blamed the privatisation of ETSA for power price increases, and they are right because we have seen power prices increase over a long period of time. We know what happens when you sell off key utilities like our electricity network. When you sell off key utilities like electricity, then you let the free market decide, and what we see is utilities working for the interests of shareholders, not the interests of the community"

Maybe if inflation was measured the old not improved method, then maybe the utility bills would not be double. Maybe the cost of everything going up so fast is just the real inflation.

"lawfare" it's a fascinating term that has evolved quite a bit. The word lawfare is a portmanteau (blend) of "law" and "warfare." It generally refers to the strategic use of legal systems, institutions, or laws as a tool or weapon often as a substitute or complement to traditional military action to achieve political, military, or strategic objectives. Early Uses (Pre-Modern Meaning)The term has appeared sporadically since at least the mid-20th century in unrelated contexts. Some sources point to a very early appearance in the 1830s (e.g., in newspapers like the Bucks Herald), though details are sparse. The first well-documented use in print came in a 1957 article about divorce law, where it described legal battles or actions in a non-military sense. It popped up occasionally in other non-security contexts (e.g., courtroom advocacy, colonialism discussions, or even puns like "airfare for lawyers"). These early instances were rare and not connected to warfare. Modern Origin and Popularization (National Security/Military Context)The term as we know it today tied to international relations, armed conflict, and asymmetric warfare really took off in the late 20th/early 21st century. It appeared in a 1999 book called Unrestricted Warfare by two Chinese PLA officers (Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui). They used it to describe using legal/international institutions as strategic tools. However, the term was popularized and given its most influential modern definition by U.S. Air Force Major General Charles J. Dunlap Jr. (now retired) in a 2001 paper presented at a Harvard conference on humanitarian challenges in military interventions. He wrote it in the context of the 1999 Kosovo campaign, where legal debates and lawyers played big roles in warfare. Dunlap originally described lawfare as:"the use of law as a weapon of war" or "a method of warfare where law is used as a means of realizing a military objective." He later refined it (to address criticisms and misuses) to:"the strategy of using or misusing law as a substitute for traditional military means to achieve an operational objective." Dunlap highlighted it as a feature of 21st-century combat, especially by weaker parties against stronger militaries (e.g., exploiting laws of war to constrain opponents, like placing forces near civilians to deter attacks or create propaganda advantages). Evolution and Broader Usage since the early 2000s, the term has spread widely:In academic and military circles (e.g., books like Orde Kittrie's Lawfare: Law as a Weapon of War) In discussions of state actors like China (e.g., South China Sea claims via legal arguments) or Russia. Sometimes pejoratively, to criticize perceived abuse of courts/international law (e.g., against Israel, the U.S. in Guantanamo cases, or ICC actions) It also inspired the name of the prominent national security blog Lawfare (launched in 2010), which covers the intersection of law and warfare. In short: While the word existed earlier in niche uses, its current meaning and prominence largely stem from Charles Dunlap's 2001 work, building on ideas from the late 1990s. The practice itself (using law strategically in conflict) goes back centuries some trace conceptual roots to Hugo Grotius in the 1600s but "lawfare" as a label is a modern coinage. CofACParty.com

WAKE THE HELL UP! PATHETIC APATHY IS HANDING EVIL THE KEYS TO OUR DEMOCRACY AND IT'S TIME TO RIP THEM BACK! Your laziness, your neglect, your cowardly shrug "Someone else will fix it" is the greatest gift you could ever give to the psychopathic thieves destroying our nation! They thrive in the shadows of your indifference. They feast on your silence. They laugh as you scroll past injustice, too comfortable to fight. Democracy is NO SPECTATOR SPORT it's a BLOOD-SWEAT-AND-FIRE DUTY! It demands your fury, your scrutiny, your unbreakable vigilance! The deadliest enemy isn't just the cold-blooded psychopath it's YOUR pathetic apathy that lets them win by default!When good people do nothing, evil doesn't just knock it kicks down the door and takes everything!Passivity is TREASON. Complicity is the pavement on the road to hell, built by predators who exploit every weak, lazy soul. Guns don't kill. People don't kill. PSYCHOPATHS KILL ruthless opportunists who twist tools of freedom into weapons of tyranny, fueled by your inertia! They're a plague on humanity, a separate breed of villains we must CRUSH through relentless vigilance and VENGEANCE AT THE BALLOT BOX!Our sacred oath PEACE, ORDER, AND GOOD GOVERNMENT for the Commonwealth, for the common good! Our weapon. UNYIELDING CITIZEN RAGE!VOTE LIKE YOUR LIFE DEPENDS ON IT BECAUSE IT DAMN WELL DOES! SCREAM OUT division before it tears us apart! HOLD THESE CORRUPT BASTARDS ACCOUNTABLE EVERY. SINGLE. DAY!NO MORE EXCUSES! NO MORE SITTING ON YOUR HANDS!Pull your weight or get crushed under the collapse you allowed!RISE UP! FIGHT BACK! RECLAIM OUR NATION!Join the revolution NOW. Stand with warriors who refuse to let psychopaths win. JOIN THE FIGHT CofACParty.com Together, we burn down apathy and rebuild the Commonwealth for WE THE PEOPLE!

Then why is govt allowing essentials like power bills to run a muck with their approval?

Thing is we do not have political representation, we do not have a responsible government, we do not have a legitimate government, we do not have lawful authority. The Ugly Truth: Psychopaths Love Power (And Politics Fits the Bill) Psychopathy isn't just movie villain stuff; it's a real personality cluster think zero empathy, charm on tap, zero remorse, and a knack for climbing ladders by stepping on rungs (or people). Globally, about 1% of folks score high on it, but it spikes in high-stakes arenas like politics, where "successful psychopaths" (the non-jailbird kind) thrive on the ego boosts and zero-sum games. In Australia? Studies show it's rife: Corporate Overlap with Politics: Forensic psych Nathan Brookes found 3-21% of corporate leaders (think execs who later jump to politics) show psychopathic traits rates mirroring prisons. One in five bosses could qualify, per his 2016 research at the Australian Psychological Society. These types wreak havoc: unethical deals, bullying, and toxic cultures that bleed into government when they pivot to public office. Pathocracy Down Under: Psychologist Steve Taylor warns of "pathocracy" governments hijacked by narcissists and psychopaths which fits Oz's revolving door of scandals. Think family court corruption (killing 3-7 Aussies a day via systemic abuse, as CofACP alleges) or pandemic-era empathy blackouts. ALP/LNP a "criminal kleptocratic theftdom" run by ASPD (antisocial personality disorder) parasites taxing families into poverty. Another labels Canberra a "rat-infested toxic swamp" with departments shielding Big Pharma, censoring truths, and botching housing/immigration. Broader Aussie Stats: A 2011 community sample pegged self-reported psychopathy at levels needing more scrutiny in non-criminal spheres like politics. And in academia/public service? Half of young researchers report bullying by "narcissistic/psychopathic" types who game the system. Politics? Same vibe empathy deficits let 'em sow discord while preaching "for the people. It's not hyperbole: these traits explain flip-flops on policy, kids in poverty despite billions sloshed around, and why "direct democracy" feels like a pipe dream under oath breakers. But It's Not Hopeless Fight Back Like CofACP The good news? Movements like yours are the antidote. CofACP's crowdsourced polls, free membership, and laser-focus on constitutional oaths (no more "treachery" under Crimes Act s24AA) could drain that swamp. Imagine: taxing imports from psychopathic regimes (e.g., China) instead of bleeding Aussie workers dry. Or mandatory civics education to spot the snakes early. CofACParty.com

Senate hearing now into government treachery, crimes and corruption against Australian children and families. 7 deaths per day. We are fighting unconventional asymmetric WAR CCP party Communist China lawfare against Australian children and families. In government corrupted public courts, treachery and fraud. Evidence ... After 3 years in family court. I was court ordered to see a psychologist for anger issues. There never was any, the psychologist interviewed me, then my ex. She admitted on the recording, there never was any 'domestic violence '. I had video of my son Oskar from 1 year old crying on hand over when he sees the ex, my mum had to carry him to the ex crying. He run to me at hand over. Day one the in house court consultant lied, perjury in court, 2 counts. 1. She falsely stated in court under oath. "The father committed extreme domestic violence, but won't admit it". The ex never accused me of DV. 4 years later the psychologist report proved and stated false allegations. 2. Again lied under oath, perjury "The mother is overwhelmingly the primary attachment " I uploaded the videos to YouTube and Facebook. legal aids Queensland filed for and emergency family court hearing against me for breaching Ch121Fla, to get me 12 months prison. The judge ordered I am not to video or collect any evidence against them. And to remove any evidence from the public. It goes on ... CofACParty.com

The COOKER GNOME never has any remedies, just low IQ pointless verbal diarrhoea . Renewable energy is the cheapest. Just ask MATT CANAVAN. Ask Brainworm herion boy Kennedy how helpful vaccines are in preventing Measles. Malcolm Roberts is a dangerous cretin.

You are a fraud and a public parasite. 7 deaths per day. We are fighting unconventional asymmetric WAR CCP party Communist China lawfare against Australian children and families. In government corrupted public courts, treachery and fraud. Evidence ... After 3 years in family court. I was court ordered to see a psychologist for anger issues. There never was any, the psychologist interviewed me, then my ex. She admitted on the recording, there never was any 'domestic violence '. I had video of my son Oskar from 1 year old crying on hand over when he sees the ex, my mum had to carry him to the ex crying. He run to me at hand over. Day one the in house court consultant lied, perjury in court, 2 counts. 1. She falsely stated in court under oath. "The father committed extreme domestic violence, but won't admit it". The ex never accused me of DV. 4 years later the psychologist report proved and stated false allegations. 2. Again lied under oath, perjury "The mother is overwhelmingly the primary attachment " I uploaded the videos to YouTube and Facebook. legal aids Queensland filed for and emergency family court hearing against me for breaching Ch121Fla, to get me 12 months prison. The judge ordered I am not to video or collect any evidence against them. And to remove any evidence from the public. It goes on ...

Bogut has the courage to call out the truth. Msm is pathetic, paid for, narrative aligned, grubberment patsies

Given ALP have given much of the media $M to support their trade, of course media are going to publish stories of deflection on behalf of Federal and Vic State politics. Just waiting for the next One Nation / Pauline Hanson story stating she doesn't like salt and vinegar chips so therefore don't vote for her.

And brainless fools like yourself are to scared to speak truth about “Statdust solutions”are doing to our skies,you’re just another Zionist puppet 🖕🖕🖕🖕

Yep, not journalists, just activists

President of Ukraine is a comedian 🤣 too.

I like Dave Hughes but I think “comedian” is a bit of a stretch! 🤷‍♂️

When football is MORE important than REAL LIFE..

This is what 67 million gets you

It's not private if they are outside in full view.

Free speech to comment on it.

The Tigers players allegedly acted out something that allegedly happened as reported to police in an alleged case ..

True , just like it’s true we are being sprayed from the sky like bugs and you say you can’t find any proof either you’re blind or just not looking properly… you have lost me … PEOPLE FIRST PARTY. For me

"Andrew Bigot"

Bogus Bogut!😂

Well said 👍🙏❤️

Cooker

False equivalence is how simpletons talk. It allows them to better understand the world by bringing two entirely unrelated things together, attempting to compare them, and then coming to some weird type of conclusion.

Meh, just treat it like climate change and ignore it until it goes away.

He’s ended his career supporting the hard right. Simple as that.

All the msm will be out of a job in a few years nobody watches them anymore

Hughes aren't funny lol.

Albo needs to include Dave Hughes in that 66 Million State run Media Propaganda fund and sort this out