Specific Questions not answered but responded with "Waffle" and defended by the Chair. Defending the Labor Ideology.

Just answer senator Robert's question. ❓️

But they don’t silence anything that they want .

“There is a limit to free speech” How ironic

There are only TWO GENDERS. Male and Female.

AHPRA needs to take a good look at what most Australians believe.

Education is the tool because it is the longest-leverage weapon the state has. It cannot be easily reversed, it affects every generation, and it replaces God's authority with the state's authority in the most fundamental way: by shaping the mind and heart of the next generation. The Fabians understood this, and their success in nationalizing education (1902) was the single most important step in establishing secular socialism in Britain—and the model was exported worldwide. Secular state education has a disproportionate effect on women, leading to a rise in "liberal" views that directly undermine the biblical family structure. Secular education promotes individual autonomy over covenantal duty. For women, this often manifests as a rejection of traditional gender roles, marriage, and child-rearing in favor of career, independence, and self-fulfillment. The "Liberal" Outcome: Data from the Pew Research Center and PNAS confirms that higher education (especially secular) is strongly correlated with: Lower opposition to abortion and same-sex marriage. Lower likelihood of being married. Higher acceptance of cohabitation and non-traditional family structures. Lower religiosity and church attendance The Fabian Women's Group (1908): Founded to "study women's economic independence in relation to socialism." Their goal was to separate women from the family and place them under the state's care By providing free state education and state pensions (for mothers), the Fabians sought to make women economically independent from their husbands, thereby dissolving the biblical family unit A generation of women educated in secular schools who viewed the state, not the family or the church, as their primary source of identity, security, and moral authority. Secular education secularizes women more than men, and this has a devastating impact on the family. 1964 Labour Manifesto: The most cited evidence is the 1964 Labour Party Manifesto (heavily influenced by Fabians) wh

Through the Looking Glass

Where does this constitute a serious risk to public health and safety ?

If you born with a willy born with Willy born with the willy you're a man

Male or female or wishful thinking

No patient complaints makes it a nothing burger.

I get the protecting vulnerable cohort thing, I really do, however at the same time this negates the ability to heed advice or helpful warnings etc, for example a doctor making public that transgender men may need to check for ovarian cancer or pap smears and transgender woman may need in many cases to check for testicular cancer...etc etc There's an whole world of difference between hate speech and biological fact and critical but valid opinions and view points.

Keep pushing. AHPRA needs to be transparent and held to account. It is not their role to use registration funding for political policing. They need reminded of their purpose and primary role.

When a Psychiatrist is no longer allowed to share facts on this topic without enduring adverse actions, then we know this country no longer has free speech. The left have launched a war on reality.

The fact that the complaints did not come from patients tells me everything I need to know. I’m not for gender ideology, but we still need to have these conversations for the very small minority that may receive warranted care.

OMG and I saw a doctor for an insurance company, whose patient died, but he was still working. There are Two species Male and Female. There are people naturally born with both sets of genitals, both male and female, but their blood must still show one gene dominance.

You work really hard Senator Roberts to uphold justice, fairness and a pathway for a better functioning Australia.

They are not answering the questions

I'd really like to hear some answers about their treatmernt of Dr My Le Trinh

"we go by the guidelines"..... But can't tell you what they are, or aren't. And practitioners are open to debate what these things are..... Unless we don't like what they are saying. Which in that case we will block and pursue them.

That was government interference in sanctioning and stopping educated free speech

Avoidance of the question wasting tax payers money

This is totally out of control.

On you senator and good speaking up chairperson

Go One Nation for Australia 🇦🇺 🧡 Prefence Greens and Labor last 👌

One Nation would however love to fund everyone to drive petrol cars, drink and smoke.

Except that our debt comes from the $700b added by the last LNP government

Holy moly. The highest assembly of Australian politics. Charged with giving this confusion air time. Representation is critical, but man, it has its tradeoffs.

Australians can’t afford a bloke that wears tin foil hats for a living..

💯 agree it means the second person or partner only gets 50% of the single pension impossible to live on and makes you feel insignificant!

Please detail reckless spending! Defence? Pensions?

Labor government did not raise the permanent fuel excise rate by 16 cents per litre; rather, they ended a temporary 16-cent-per-litre cost-of-living discount that allowed fuel prices to return to their normal rate.

If labor has reckless spending why is the debt to GDP ratio falling

The huge smirk in the background says it all. He can hardly control his laughter at the babbling fool.

The world's oceans have just reached their highest temperatures on record and you want to get rid of net zero targets? Seriously man, this stuff is actually important. Show some leadership and get behind the science. No one has more to lose from climate change than Australia.

Australia can't afford ON's policy of higher immigration.

Pauline Hanson recently voted AGAINST a 25% tax on gas exports, and also against banning Gas Industry lobbyists from Parliament. And AGAIN voted AGAINST on April 1st, and August 12th. That could fund schools, hospitals, pensions, roadworks... Claims to support Paid Parental Leave, but didn't turn up to vote for it; and Malcolm Roberts voted AGAINST. Hanson has stated "she doesn't care if cuts to migration affect business". If you are a business owner - she's not looking after your interests either. She wants to prevent farmers from installing wind turbines or solar panels - thus increasing their incomes and drought-proofing their farms. Agree with renewables or not - One Nation wants to control your life. Pauline Hanson voted: Against legislation to punish wage theft Against increasing the minimum wage - FOUR TIMES! Against a Royal Commission into violence and abuse against people with a disability Against Federal support for action on public housing Against increasing political transparency Against increasing workplace protections for workers Against increasing funding for public schools Against increasing housing affordability Against restricting political donations Look them up for yourself: theyvoteforyou.org.au/ One Nation wants to make abortion harder to access. And end government paid parental leave. Strip Medicare. Reduce the PBS. They also want to abolish the Therapeutic Goods Administration: the body that makes sure our medicines are safe. Pauline Hanson has described paid leave for those experiencing family and domestic violence as “ridiculous”, and suggested the issue is taking police away from “real crime”, calling for the family law system to be “wound back”. She spoke AGAINST Domestic Violence payments - a small step to aid women leaving violent relationships - calling it "a holiday". Any woman voting One Nation is voting AGAINST her own safety. ON Senator Malcolm Roberts stated on the 28/7/26: "The Family Court is the "slaughterhouse of the nation". On average a woman is killed in Australia by her partner ONCE A WEEK. The Family Court is one of the few protections women have in this country against violent men. ON will remove those protections. Opposed higher taxation on superannuation accounts over 3 million (the part over that amount), and again over 10 million (the part over that amount) in order to fund accounts under 3 million with a small amount of government contribution. It's a small step towards rebalancing the entrenched wealth inequity that affects most of the people who will be voting One Nation. You are voting AGAINST your own interests! Pauline Hanson recently floated the idea of effectively ending compulsory super for some lower-income workers. One Nation’s own website says they want to “unlock more land for housing.” But when it came time to actually unlock land for up to 11,000 homes in North Ellenbrook, W.A. - they voted against it. Literally fewer than 40% of those intending to vote One Nation actually support One Nation policies!(Essential Polling) It's a cult of personality driven by ignorance and fear. And Pauline Hanson used party funds for luxury hotels during her holiday in Europe. You suckers giving her money! She's using you and you're too stupid to know it. She is not a "woman of the people" nor is she a "woman for the people". One Nation is a grifting tool for Hanson's personal wealth at the expense of the working class that has been conned into voting for her by the clever use of populist slogans.

Bos saya bilang dia akan menjadi presiden negara bagian lalu presiden nasional, karena dia akan memberikan hak istimewa yang lebih besar kepada warga kulit putih dibandingkan warga lainnya.

You know ON will never be in a federal situation to implement any of your dot points.

LIEbor P/Services Kunts OUT in Force on O/T 2nite hey

Most vile disgusting thieving corrupt grubernment ever fu albanazi

🫰🫰

Why does your first sentence attack spending yet the remainder of your incoherent often irrational post attempts to critique revenue raising?