Pauline Hanson's One Nation is a right-wing populist party in Australia characterized by economic nationalism, social conservatism, and opposition to mass immigration. The party’s current platform, led by Pauline Hanson and MP Barnaby Joyce, focuses on protecting Australian sovereignty, reducing government waste, and addressing cost-of-living pressures through immediate relief measures. Immigration and Border Security One Nation advocates for drastically reducing migration to ease pressure on housing and infrastructure. Key proposals include: Capping visas at 130,000 per year across all categories, including foreign students. Deporting illegal migrants and visa holders who break the law. Refusing entry to migrants from nations deemed to foster "extremist ideologies" incompatible with Australian values. Withdrawing from the UN Refugee Convention. Energy and Climate The party rejects climate change action and net-zero targets, labeling them as "economic suicide." Their energy policy prioritizes: Abolishing net-zero legislated targets and withdrawing from the Paris Agreement. Expanding coal and gas production, including building new coal-fired plants and establishing a national domestic gas reserve. Developing nuclear energy as a reliable baseload power source. Banning offshore wind and renewables on agricultural land. Housing and Economy One Nation links housing affordability to immigration and foreign ownership, proposing: A five-year pause on GST for building materials to lower construction costs. A ban on foreign ownership of residential property and agricultural land. Allowing Australians to use superannuation to purchase homes. A $90 billion budget savings plan to eliminate government waste, reform the NDIS, and cut unnecessary departments. Social and Legal Issues The party emphasizes traditional values and individual rights: Free Speech: Enshrining free speech protections in the Constitution and introducing citizen-initiated referenda. Crime: Implementing "truth in sentencing," mandatory imprisonment for violent crime, and stricter penalties for drug traffickers. Health: Rolling back abortion laws to restrict access, particularly in later stages of pregnancy, and increasing funding for regional health services. Gun Laws: Supporting responsible gun ownership for work, farming, and sports, while opposing further stringent regulations.

So if One Nation can put forward thrir policies, why can't the other parties put their policies out???

Actually less government policy is the best type of policy. Simple policy is how the government was meant to Work.

Funny looking Aussie flag.

Yes they keep saying they have no policies only because they’re scared and if it looks like they’re going to get in I’m pretty sure Pauline will gather some very good people around her to help her. People with the same values as the rest of Australia 

One Nation has policies. It is just that they don't know what they are or how they going to work. The wheels are starting to fall off as expected.

They have policies. But the lack of detail is the problem. An example is the recent faux pas by Barnaby Joyce with Andrew Bolt. The policy hadn’t be fleshed out other than the slogan. If they’re serious, they need to get them costed and provide significant detail. Their education policy is particularly vague and shows limited understanding of how the education system operates.

It's not a belief, it's a fact, not one costed well thought out cohesive policy at all

Written in crayon???

They have a great web site and their policies are very clearly written. I oppose Pauline as a PM possibility and generally see the canditates and representatives as incompetent, but the web site is great.

All of the ON Policy are on the Website. Actually good reading 👍

Yes they have 3 housing policies 🤣🤣🤣

I’ve got an idea, you should put it forward in parliament sometime when you actually decide to show up there. Politicians to get paid in accordance with how often they actually show up to work. What do you think? I mean I don’t wanna name names here because it might upset some people in your audience but some politicians only show up 50% of the time. If we gave them only 50% of the pay they might actually start showing up, if they still don’t then at least we could save millions of our wasted tax dollars. What do you think? If I only showed up to my work 50% of the time I’d get fired so I feel like politicians are still getting off lightly with this proposed policy. Would be keen to your thoughts since you’re always harping on about how people don’t wanna work anymore, I’m sure this would have your unequivocal support?

Tax all gas and coal at 50% and collect all royalties or NO VOTE

If she spent more time talking about her own policies instead of bagging current ones that goes for all by the way I think Australia would be better for it

No policies that anyone understands.

Policies are not just Pauline’s talking points. They are accepted by the party, understood by members, independently costed and have consequences considered. When did your party room vote on any of the ideas you refer to as “policy”?

One Nation all the way

They want you to believe One Nation has no policies. Do not fall for it. That is the standard tactic of the political establishment. If they cannot explain why people are abandoning the major parties, they try to ridicule the alternative. If they cannot defend their own record, they attack the challenger as dangerous, empty or extreme. But Australians are not fools. They can see the country is under pressure: housing, immigration, energy, taxes, crime, infrastructure, cost of living and trust in government. They can also see that the existing political class helped create many of these problems. That is why people are looking elsewhere. This is not just about One Nation. It is about voters rejecting the arrogance of career politicians who believe they can lie, spin, tax, regulate and then frighten people back into line at election time. As I argue in The Career Politician Problem: “When voters no longer believe the political class represents them, they begin looking for disruption rather than reassurance.” That is exactly what is happening. The major parties can keep sneering, or they can ask themselves why so many Australians are now prepared to vote for anyone but them. You can read The Career Politician Problem free at: rda-publications.weebly.com

We urgently need a policy on Castle law, a policy on National Parks/land councils etc ... It's a priority in the Territory

All this is irrelevant as Dumb Nation will never hold power. For Hanson to become Prime Minister after the next federal election, several things would need to happen almost simultaneously: One Nation would need to convert polling support into actual lower-house seats. The party would need strong candidates across dozens of electorates. Preference flows would need to work in its favour. Hanson would likely need to win a House of Representatives seat herself. The major parties would need to continue losing support at an unusually rapid rate. One Nation would need to convince voters it is ready not just to protest, but to govern. Political history suggests that major realignments usually take multiple election cycles. Even when new political movements surge, building the local organisations, candidate networks, fundraising, and voter trust needed to win large numbers of seats is a slow process. A useful comparison is that parties such as the Australian Greens spent decades building their parliamentary presence. Even when support grew substantially, translating that into lower-house seats was much harder than winning Senate representation. What seems more plausible over the next two years is: One Nation increases its vote share. It wins a few more House seats. It gains additional Senate seats. It exerts more influence over the policy agenda. That's a very different outcome from Hanson becoming Prime Minister. So while political momentum can change surprisingly quickly, going from a minor party with limited House representation to leading a federal government in a single election cycle would be one of the most dramatic transformations Australia has ever seen. The electoral mathematics are simply much tougher than the headline polling numbers suggest.

Keep up the good work One Nation 🤩

So if your policy is to force property owners to give up a property after 2 years - I assume with your time in the Senate you understand an average citizenship pathway. Using the standard pathway: * Eligibility is usually reached after 4 years of residence in Australia. * Once an application is lodged, 50% of citizenship applications are decided within 4 months, and 90% within 8 months. * After approval, 90% of applicants are offered a ceremony within 6 months

All paid for by billionaires

Are they costed?