https://img.youtube.com/vi/embltkJw99U/maxresdefault.jpg
720
1280
Senator Malcolm Roberts
https://www.malcolmrobertsqld.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/One-Nation-Logo1-300x150.png
Senator Malcolm Roberts2023-12-05 17:08:082023-12-12 08:54:50Tough Questions Asked on Digital ID BillSPEECHES
Malcolm’s latest Speeches to Parliament
https://img.youtube.com/vi/embltkJw99U/maxresdefault.jpg
720
1280
Senator Malcolm Roberts
https://www.malcolmrobertsqld.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/One-Nation-Logo1-300x150.png
Senator Malcolm Roberts2023-12-05 17:08:082023-12-12 08:54:50Tough Questions Asked on Digital ID Bill
Digital ID Bill Passes First of Three Stages
Speeches
Government’s Runaway Spending on Disability
Speeches
Workers Left Unprotected Whilst Labor Play Their Games
Speeches
Air Albotross: Australia’s Only Reliable Airline
Speeches
Labor Holding Workers Rights Hostage
SpeechesSOCIAL MEDIA
Latest posts from Malcolm’s Facebook and Twitter
Treasurer Jim Chalmers’ hypocrisy, double standards & deceit.
Extraordinary.
It’s OK for his staff to access 3% of their super yet he says it is NOT OK for struggling Australians.
... See MoreSee Less
- Likes: 594
- Shares: 241
- Comments: 122
Why is this communist government still in power
This rule has been around for nearly 10 years, it was brought in by the libs.
You already know that people can access their superannuation in certain situations Champ. 😂🤣😂
He's a tool
FARKS - SAKE
I read it on Facebook so it must be true
Not his staff as all are public servants. Thank you for this information.
Where is the content on this claim?
That saying "do as I say, not as I do" comes to mind.
Since when do public servants get special rules? Doesn't it have to be legislated to include ATO requirements?
🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
😡😡🤡
Fucking News-corp rubbish, it's the same offer to anybody that has been around since Covid. Change of name hasn't helped you Rupert slime bags. 🐐
Each way jimbo
Is this true!!!! Interesting — and worth knowing Parliamentary staff can receive 15.4% employer super. They have an option where 3.4% can instead be paid as a taxable allowance, leaving 12% going into super. One Nation has proposed allowing eligible ordinary Australians to redirect 3% of their compulsory 12% super into their wages for up to three years to help with rent or mortgage costs. Jim Chalmers has criticised the One Nation proposal, arguing that reducing compulsory super would hurt people's retirement savings. The two policies ARE NOT exactly the same — parliamentary staff are choosing what happens to the extra 3.4% above the standard super rate, while One Nation's proposal would reduce the amount going into an ordinary worker's super from 12% to 9%. But I still think Australians are entitled to ask the question: If parliamentary staff can be trusted to make a choice about taking part of their super entitlement as money now, why shouldn't ordinary working Australians be trusted to make informed choices about their own money when they're struggling with rent or a mortgage?
Sounds about right. Do as I say, not as I do 🤬
Are we still pretending political hypocrisy and double standards are a shocking new discovery? 😂 The public is just getting much better at noticing it.
One Nation's Super Pay Boost gives workers the choice to direct their super increase towards paying off their mortgage, or helping to pay rent.
EVERY Australian deserves a roof over their head!
... See MoreSee Less
where's the column for calculating how much less super you'll have? that would be important to include, so people can compare the two figures
Compound interest on savings?
Here ya go, Micro Malcolm. Both sides of the story...
You,d have to weigh up interest on home against your super interest
Why would it be deemed extra repayment? Isn’t it just to being able to afford the payment?
Go one step further create a super offset account linked to PPOR. Money cannot be touched and can shifted between super shares and PPOR. More flexibility
Still not willing to show the impact on super balance at retirement I see.
Is it okay for us to spend it on hair treatment? I’ve been bald for a few years now, I just shaved it cos I thought I was thinning but I wish I hung in there for a few years longer cos now my hair doesn’t grow on top at all… it’s pretty good around the back and sides still but just on top it doesn’t grow much at all anymore Can we maybe use our super for a hair piece? Just a thought that I had
So renters can help landlords pay off their investments faster, leaving themselves even worse off at retirement.
I'm beyond happy that my super accrued only after 30 years [it was introduced in my 30s] is there for me to use now that I'm retired. Forcing me to budget to pay my mortgage because I couldn't access my super was brilliant as there's not a hope in hell I would've used any extra income in lieu of super, to pay off my mortgage. I'm now mortgage free with a nice nest egg to allow me to travel and enjoy my retirement after decades of hard work. This policy is insane. I
And make them poor in retirement
Now do inflation and house prices
Paying off your debt should always be a priority, so definitely a winner!
So to get this interest saving we all need to start a 30 year mortgage?
It’s fine! We all make mistakes!
This doesn't factor in the cost of independent financial advice, which everyone should get before accessing super. Also interesting that the policy targets people who can't afford independent financial advice.
Can I see the independent facts please?
Midget Cooker strikes again!
Great idea straight to my Sportsbet account 😜
You only taking notice of super now since Gerard Rennick People First Party has been talking about it the last year.
What will $44 do for me per week?
So what happens to the super balance at retirement as a result? $100,000 - $300,000 less?
Have they worked out the effect allowing billions into the market at the same time, on our inflation rate? I'd say that's a no
Still speaking to the less educated I see. They're the only ones who think this is a good idea...
During my questioning of Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS) Director Ms Neville, I asked about the agency's funding, definitions of family, and research focus.
The AIFS operates on an annual budget of approximately $23 million, consisting of a $4.7 million departmental appropriation and around $18 million in government-commissioned revenue.
I questioned Ms Neville on whether broadening the definition of "family" to include diverse structures, single parents and kin risks making the term meaningless. I also asked whether the institute's remit has evolved since its establishment under the Family Law Act 1975.
I raised several concerns regarding the agency's reporting on relationship dynamics and domestic duties, referencing Australian and international statistics on work hours, commutes, and divorce rates among different coupling types.
I'm not sure if this agency has left me confident they are genuine in providing data for Australian families. What I am sure of is that One Nation believes in promoting traditional family units rather than narratives of victimhood.
This is a 4-minute excerpt from a 15-minute video. Watch the full session on:
senroberts.com/4A1nw4T;
senroberts.com/4hiu6MY
... See MoreSee Less
That is what I would like to know too... she had her head down the whole time and never once looked directly at Malcolm. I was tought that when you speak to someone you make constant eye contact. Otherwise you are considered shifty. 😄
how is that emotive it a question of fact do men travel further?
Malcolm Roberts says he’s concerned the Australian Institute of Family Studies has “left me confident they are genuine in providing data for Australian families”, then immediately complains that its definition of family includes single parents, kinship families and other diverse structures. That isn’t mission creep. That is literally studying Australian families as they actually exist. AIFS was established in 1980 under the Family Law Act 1975 to research factors affecting family wellbeing. Its remit is not, and never has been, “study only married heterosexual couples with children and tell us why they’re best.” Its job is to research Australian families, including how family structures, relationships, work, separation, parenting and social change affect people. And yes, that includes single-parent families, blended families, de facto couples and kinship arrangements. Those are not invented categories designed to make the word “family” meaningless. They are real households containing real adults and real children. AIFS has been documenting family diversity for decades, not because somebody recently discovered “wokeness”, but because Australian family life has actually changed. Roberts also appears suspicious that AIFS researches domestic labour, employment patterns and relationship dynamics. Again, that is not evidence of ideological capture. It is family research. Recent AIFS work, for example, finds that married women remain more likely than women in de facto relationships to take on traditionally female household responsibilities, and that women continue to perform more unpaid domestic work overall. It also reports that divorce rates in Australia are currently at their lowest level in around 50 years. Those findings don’t say marriage is bad. They describe measurable differences in how Australian couples live. The particularly revealing line is Roberts saying One Nation believes in promoting “traditional family units rather than narratives of victimhood.” A research institute is not there to promote his preferred family structure. It is there to measure reality. Something Senator Malcolm Roberts seems determined to avoid. If the evidence shows marriage has benefits, publish it. If it shows women are carrying disproportionate unpaid work, publish that too. If single-parent families face different pressures, study them. If divorce rates fall, report it. Research stops being research the moment politicians decide the answers should be chosen first. Roberts is perfectly entitled to advocate for traditional families. He is not entitled to demand that an independent research body pretend every Australian family already looks like the one he prefers. Politics isn’t a team sport. Facts over noise.
Senator Malcolm Roberts, What research has AIFS commissioned or undertaken specifically examining coercive control, psychological abuse and interference with parent-child relationships where mothers are alleged perpetrators and fathers or children are alleged victims, and how does that expenditure compare with research examining the converse?
Why is she not looking at you Malcolm 🤬
Good work Senator… they have to be kept accountable
He’s cooked!
Thank you 🙏 Senator Malcolm Roberts! You are a legend and a true Australian leader!
He nailed it
Thank you Senator. This is so important.
Still living in the 50's.
Check out the slouched position……so chilled and relaxed asking the hard questions
Someone texting her the reply??
How many cushions is lil Malc sitting on so he can reach the bench?
Is there any such thing as a “traditional family unit” or is the term merely a meaningless construct? Please explain.
"The narrative of victim hood" Thats Hanson to a tee
OFFICIAL BIOGRAPHY Reverend Stefanus Samberi, An Irian Barat Person Neither Indonesian nor Dutch Correcting the Distortion of the History of Irian Barat Based on World Historical Documents Reverend Stefanus Samberi, an Irian Barat person, was a figure who played an important role in the international political and economic processes concerning the status and future of Irian Barat. Based on world historical documents concerning the political and economic rights of Irian Barat, the struggle and role of Reverend Stefanus Samberi can be described as follows: 1. Role in the International Political Dynamics of Irian Barat Reverend Stefanus Samberi, born in the City of Serui on July 6, 1935, was an international diplomatic figure who played a role in the global political and economic process concerning the status of Irian Barat since 1961. He attended a strategic meeting in Washington, D.C., on April 24, 1961, with the President of the United States, John F. Kennedy, the President of the Republic of Indonesia, Ir. Sukarno, and the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia, Dr. Soebandrio. The meeting was part of the international political dynamics that subsequently led to TRIKORA (People's Triple Command) on December 19, 1961, namely the war between the Republic of Indonesia and the Kingdom of the Netherlands concerning Irian Barat. The conflict was subsequently mediated by the United States and the United Nations (UN), which ultimately resulted in the New York Agreement of August 15, 1962. The New York Agreement was signed by the Republic of Indonesia and the Kingdom of the Netherlands as the contracting parties. The agreement subsequently gave rise to United Nations General Assembly Resolution No. 1752 of September 21, 1962, which established Irian Barat as a Non-Self-Governing Territory and placed it under the Special Committee on Decolonization (C-24), as well as the establishment of UNTEA (United Nations Temporary Executive Authority). On October 1, 1962, Reverend Stefanus Samberi was recognized within the UNTEA administrative structure and received official United Nations Card No. 206 as a Junior Labour Inspector. Based on the New York Agreement and United Nations General Assembly Resolution No. 1752, the Netherlands transferred the administration of the government of Irian Barat to UNTEA. Subsequently, UNTEA transferred the administration of the government to the Republic of Indonesia on May 1, 1963. 2. The Rome Agreement of September 30, 1962 On September 30, 1962, Reverend Stefanus Samberi signed the Rome Agreement, which established a special task for the Republic of Indonesia to develop Irian Barat for 25 years, namely from May 1, 1963 to May 1, 1988. 3. The First Work Contract between Irian Barat and PT Freeport McMoRan On April 7, 1967, Reverend Stefanus Samberi, as the holder of United Nations Card No. 206, signed the first Work Contract Agreement between Irian Barat and PT Freeport McMoRan. The contract was valid for a period of 30 years, namely 1967–1997. The agreement did not involve the signature of any Indonesian state official. This agreement constituted an Irian Barat State Security. 4. Inauguration as Chairman of the Special Red-and-White Movement for Irian Barat On August 17, 1968, Reverend Stefanus Samberi was inaugurated at the State Palace as Chairman of the Special Red-and-White Movement for Irian Barat based on: 1. Presidential Decree of the Republic of Indonesia No. 13566/7/68; and 2. Presidential Decree of the Republic of Indonesia No. 035/TK/1968, dated August 17, 1968, with the approval of the United Nations. 5. Role in Initiating the PEPERA Reverend Stefanus Samberi was the figure who initiated PEPERA (Act of Free Choice). On January 21, 1969, Reverend Stefanus Samberi met with Queen Juliana of the Netherlands to discuss changing the mechanism of Self-Determination (PENASE) into the Act of Free Choice (PEPERA), which was carried out through representation. The change was approved 100% by Queen Juliana. 6. Implementation of PEPERA in 1969 PEPERA was held from July 14, 1969 to August 2, 1969. In its implementation, the Irian Barat Council of Deliberation of PEPERA (DMP) was given two choices: 1. To remain in association with Indonesia; or 2. To sever its relationship with Indonesia. 7. Reverend Stefanus Samberi's Role in the DMP Reverend Stefanus Samberi was the figure who directed the 1,024 members of the Council of Deliberation of PEPERA (DMP) to choose to remain in association with Indonesia. This choice was made so that Indonesia would carry out its special task of developing Irian Barat for 25 years, namely from May 1, 1963 to May 1, 1988, in accordance with the Rome Agreement of September 30, 1962. The 1,024 members of the DMP, together with Reverend Stefanus Samberi, making a total of 1,025 DMP members, were members of the Special Red-and-White Movement for Irian Barat. The result of PEPERA subsequently gave rise to United Nations General Assembly Resolution No. 2504 of November 19, 1969, which recorded that the Indonesian Government, in implementing its national development plan, gave special attention to the advancement of Irian Barat, with special development funds for Irian Barat provided through the Asian Development Bank, United Nations agencies, or other means to Indonesia for the economic and social development of Irian Barat. 8. The Death of Reverend Stefanus Samberi On April 13, 1983, Reverend Stefanus Samberi was killed by the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. His name and the history of his struggle were subsequently concealed and manipulated by the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. As a result, the people of Irian Barat have remained victims to this day. EMPHASIS This biography emphasizes that Reverend Stefanus Samberi was an Irian Barat person and neither Indonesian nor Dutch. He was positioned as an international figure within the framework of the United Nations (UN), who had a role in the political, governmental, economic, and self-determination processes concerning the future of Irian Barat. Therefore, the history and struggle of Reverend Stefanus Samberi need to be placed within the framework of world historical documents and international relations, rather than solely within the Indonesian or Dutch colonial narrative. This biography was prepared as an effort to correct the distortion of the history of Irian Barat and to restore the discussion concerning Reverend Stefanus Samberi based on historical documents relating to the political and economic status of Irian Barat. Writer: Yakobus D. Samberi (Jacky Papua) The eldest grandson of Pastor Stefanus Samberi, holder of PBB Card number 206. Contact: +6281244394544
Google Jordan Peterson on Canadian politics.
Thanks Malcolm.
Google Dominik Tarczynski on know immigration into POLAND.
Hey Malcolm, why don’t you ask your coal buddies why the Australian taxpayer has to clean up their destruction of the natural environment while they’re the ones who made billions extracting resources tax-free? Please explain, Malcolm.
Nothing but a cooked out space alien
BREAKING: YouTube has suddenly banned me from uploading, posting or live streaming for two weeks
The reason given is dozens of videos, some more than 6 months old, that have only now been flagged as an issue.
This includes multiple videos calling for a COVID Royal Commission.
Thank you for meme, David
I co-signed the Digital ID Repeal Bill alongside Senators Antic, Babet, Canavan, Hanson and Rennick, which was introduced into the Senate earlier today.
This Bill aims to repeal the government's dystopian and ill-conceived Digital ID Bill.
What everyday Australians need is a… https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1805872597449818132
2 years ago I promised to hound down those responsible for the damage our COVID measures caused to Australians.
Today, in company with Senators Antic, Canavan, Rennick and O'Sullivan, a Bill was introduced to immediately commence a Senate Select Commission of Inquiry into our… https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1805533759519048180
Australia declared the most expensive country for housing in the English speaking world.
Ban foreigners buying houses and cut immigration now!
ALL NEWS
Malcolm’s press releases, speeches and other stories

Patients First – Not Profits or Mandates
National
Australians Pay the Price for Net-Zero
National, Speeches
Critical Thinking 🙄
National
Fake Degrees, Real Consequences—But Not for the Offenders
National, Speeches
One Million Reasons You Can’t Afford Rent
National, Speeches
Scrap the EV Slush Fund
National, SpeechesMEDIA RELEASES
Malcolm’s latest media announcements
Pages
Malcolm’s Fight
Casual Coal Wage TheftFebruary 21, 2024 - 2:09 pmOver $30,000 a year being stolen, and it’s been signed off by the union and the government. Find out about the largest wage theft from casuals in Australia.
My Other IssuesFebruary 16, 2021 - 12:08 pm
Murray Darling BasinMarch 23, 2020 - 3:05 am
Foreign OwnershipOctober 16, 2019 - 4:58 am
Property rightsOctober 16, 2019 - 4:39 am
United Nations #AUSEXITOctober 16, 2019 - 2:31 am
Categories
- April 2022
- Assets
- Budget 20-21
- Climate Change
- COVID
- Digital Identity Bill
- Energy
- Events
- February 2022
- Foreign Ownership
- Hybrid Bradfield
- Industrial Relations
- Infrastructure
- March 2021
- May/June 2021
- Media
- Media Release
- Murray Darling Basin
- National
- October 2021
- October 2023
- Podcasts
- Property Rights
- Queensland
- Senate Estimates
- Senate Inquiry Public Hearings
- Speeches
- Uncategorized
- United Nations
- Water


