Got to give him credit for actually answering the question… unlike others who” take it on notice “ but sounds like a word salad that says we are looking after our mates..

A circus made to go around, circle the wagon until the money cannot be traced.

There needs to be an independent audit performed.

They write the rules so they can rort the system

Thank goodness you are here Malcolm Roberts!!

The moment they mention “under the law”or “is entirely legal” or in the “legal framework”, it quickly translates into; They’ve spent a ton of money with lawyers exploring the very edges of the grey areas of the legal framework and formed their “policies” in those dark corners, definitely not in the good faith of the law, but a poofteenth of a maybe it’s legal and they’ll use even more taxpayer dollars to tie it up in court forever if they get caught out (While that is happening they’re getting their own way)

Smells of brown paper bags full of cash. Jobs for the mates

"Why did the school ask the maths teacher to mark the maths tests?" That's basically the question. The Clean Energy Regulator still runs the scheme. It didn't hand control to the Clean Energy Council. It appointed them to maintain the approved product lists because they've already been assessing solar panels, batteries and inverters for years and have the technical systems in place to do it. The Regulator still sets the rules and audits compliance. � Clean Energy Council +1 Malcolm's question only sounds suspicious if you leave out the part where the Clean Energy Council has literally been doing this type of product assessment work for years.

Sounds like jobs for the boys.

Join the government it’s the only way to get super rich In a few months

Excellent work Senator Roberts

Yep and tariff only applies once a year now , redundant

What a handball

The whole thing is there’s nothing clean about renewable energy. In fact it’s worse than all the other energy sources that we had previously.!!!🙄

Very fishy 🧡🧡🧡

Keep up the good work!

If the ah and ums were taken out of this ,it would of only taken 30 seconds

Is a job for the boys

The system ensures redundancy as it requires manufacturers to pay to maintain a products “currency”. When manufacturers launch new models they don’t continue to pay currency for the old models so they become non compliant - Powerwall 2 case in point

Corruption ??

Rooftop solar is the new organised crime

Real estate decline = local Govt collapse

Jobs for the boys. Competitive bidding, bullshit. Just so happens board members are also industry investors.

#ConflictOfInterest #RoyalCommission

More importantly why are we tax payers funding Wuhan with electric/solar buses & boats?!!!

And cut pregnancy benefits for men

Malcolm the MAN

This will see people giving up on private health care and going on to the already overwhelmed public system.

Aged paid it all their working life especially those that owned small businesses

You forgot labor’s spending 😁 (Albeit which is driving inflation)

Senator Malcolm they don’t care for the elderly, they only care about confusing and controlling our young people’s minds and future. Love your honesty and stoicism in truth! Thank you 🙏 🧡🇦🇺

Who made the speech for you? Chat GBT or google Ai?

I love how this guy thinks . 😊👍🏼

For normal budget conscious people if they run out of money they just cut back on their spending but this government just looks at the Australian public and says “now who else can we rip off so we can continue to bleed them dry”

Tax the gas buddy

Yes exactly Malcolm all this Penny pinching by the government when it comes to private health insurance for over 65s will only result in many people who can’t afford to pay more for private health cover as they don’t have a big salary cut their private health insurance altogether and rely on the public system which is already under immense pressure .

It is reducing, not removing

They are not removing it they are making it consistent across all ages. The government announced this measure in the Federal Budget, stating that age should not dictate the level of financial subsidy a household receives

Can you smell smoke

Nice to see an Australian making sense.

No government is going to magically fix Australia, especially labour or one nation. In my view, this isn’t just a problem of one party, one politician, or even one country. Across much of the world we’ve watched political leaders, corporations, lobbyists and financial interests accumulate enormous wealth and influence while ordinary people struggle with housing, inflation, healthcare and the rising cost of living. The issue isn’t simply who is in power. It’s the system itself. We’ve built a culture that rewards endless accumulation, competition and short-term self-interest rather than cooperation, community and stewardship. I don’t think the answer is putting our faith in another politician. I think the long-term answer is creating systems that encourage fairness, accountability, local resilience and a willingness to share resources rather than endlessly hoard them. A society only works when people recognise that we’re all connected. When wealth, opportunity and power become concentrated in fewer and fewer hands, eventually the system starts breaking down for everyone.

The government forgets that we didn't just take out private health when we turned 65. In our case I started it the year I started working 1974. Yes that's how long my family funded our own health care from. We could afford it - dual income. We chose to stay out of the public system to leave it to people who needed it. Now as aged pensioners we try to keep it up. We are no longer on top cover but we do get hospitals paid for although now with an excess. It has been a struggle but we did it so others could use the public system . Now as this government has seen fit to penalise us for that by removing the discount. Shame on the way they treat their elderly. They forget that one day that will be them . Only they won't be struggling to pay the bills on the age pension . They will have their government funded politicians pension. Won't affect them at all. This government is disgraceful. This week they have managed to lose the female vote and now older people. Great week Albo.

Private health insurance providers are also making massive profits, health should never be about profit for them or our government, we all pay medicare.

The labour proposal forces the elderly out of the access to healthcare & into certain death because disease cant’t be addressed. This appears to be to cull the elderly population targeted at those unlimited income which would be most likely to be a burden on the public health system. Its disgusting & discriminatory. Maybe means testing this would be fairer.

I'm 66 and have never had a 34% rebate on my health insurance. I used to get 30% until Howard cut it back to under 25%

“𝘗𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘴 — 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘌𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘯 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘴, 𝘸𝘩𝘰, 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘎𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘬𝘴, 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘩𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘴𝘦𝘵 — 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮 𝘣𝘺 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘶𝘨𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘯𝘦𝘰-𝘢𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘯 𝘗𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘤 𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘮𝘴. [...] 𝘐𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘯-𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘩𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘩𝘯𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘺 — 𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭, 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘴—𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘴, 𝘥𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘣𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺, 𝘢𝘥𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳, 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘣𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘴. 𝘍𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘭𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 [...]. 𝘓𝘦𝘵 𝘶𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘦 𝘱𝘶𝘳𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘥𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘮𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘦𝘵𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘌𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘯 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘮 𝘰𝘧 𝘐𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘶𝘴. 𝘐𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘢 𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘍𝘶𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘮 — 𝘦𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘱𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘍𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘯, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 — 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘭𝘪𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮, 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘫𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘶𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺.” — 𝗚𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗮𝘂𝗺𝗲 𝗙𝗮𝘆𝗲, 𝘓𝘦 𝘚𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦̀𝘮𝘦 𝘢̀ 𝘵𝘶𝘦𝘳 𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘶𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘴 (𝘗𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘴: 𝘊𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘪𝘤, 1981). 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯: '𝘞𝘩𝘺 𝘞𝘦 𝘍𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵: 𝘔𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘌𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘯 𝘙𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦', (𝘓𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘯: 𝘈𝘳𝘬𝘵𝘰𝘴 𝘔𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘢, 2011).

Nationalise the private healthcare system?

How about we start taking perks and benefits off politicians 🤬🤬

So logical but impervious to some ??

i have paid for private health since late 1970’s, making the choice to go without other things. Why should I now be penalised because Labor cannot balance the budget as a result of waste.