We stand with you Malcolm Roberts ONE NATION 🙏

Youve.gotmy.vote.Malcolm

Got my vote

Got my vote malcolm

God bless U sir 🙏💞👍

Senator Malcolm Roberts I think you’ll win your spot back. I also think SA, WA and Tassie could happen.

🙏 for One Nation ❤️

Done!!

Already have! 😎

Senator Malcolm Roberts "AUSTRALIAN LABOR are the RAPISTS CHOICE 😠" details, top post (our page) fully documented.

Done!!

You got my vote today legends 🇦🇺🇦🇺

YOU CAN'T TRUST LABOR

Always was always will be white European Australians on aboriginals land pay the rent captain Cook breed

Yeah🙏👍

Done.

The reason they give us 2 choices is because it would be too obvious to the sheep if we only had one, and they call it democracy, others call it mob rule, democracy is 2 wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner

Already voted for you mate

Big job…..their both hopeless

what does hold to account actually mean....criminals are charged ever day.. and out bail on our streets now.....probably like alot of people..Iam getting sick of all this smoke & mirrors BS...... we want to see results.....showing what you wanna do is better than telling..

We stand with you Malcolm Roberts ONE NATION 🙏

I'll just say it's not necessarily what they say it's what they abstain from voting on that tells the real storey. Of course people don't think to look that up.

Need to have a doge

Don't think so. Sold out weak man. We were fooled

Just watched ACA I cannot believe all these dumb ass people they spoke to think Labor has done a good job wtf is wrong with everyone

A man is known by his actions, not words.

How...you need to get a lot of votes

How many times have we heard that bull shxt . 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡🫵

It is great to see One Nation has a Candidate in most Electorates 👏🏻👏🏻

Truth and Integrity. Senator Gerard Rennick

The problem is that they can't be held to account and they couldn't care less,no morals !

How do you hold them for account when you preference one of them for seats? Where do you stand in the hate speech bill?

*does

Yeah, you're a time wasting cooker in parliament.

Look at Canada's election, ours will be the same sh!t show.

Did you hear the truth about Albonese he lied about his family they were well off he has lied to the people he serves

We definitely need you there good luck.

When a Prime Minister lies to the people they serve, the consequences can be significant and far-reaching, impacting their political standing, their government's legitimacy, and the public's trust in the political system. Here's a breakdown of potential repercussions: Political Consequences: * Erosion of Public Trust: The most immediate and damaging consequence is the loss of trust from the electorate. Once a leader is perceived as dishonest, it becomes difficult to regain public confidence, impacting their ability to govern effectively. * Damage to Reputation: The Prime Minister's personal and professional reputation can be severely tarnished, potentially leading to long-term negative perceptions. * Loss of Authority and Influence: A Prime Minister who has lied loses moral authority and the ability to persuade and lead the public and their own party. * Increased Scrutiny and Criticism: Any subsequent statements or actions by the Prime Minister will be met with increased skepticism, scrutiny from the media, and criticism from the opposition and the public. * Weakened Political Capital: Lying depletes the political capital necessary to implement policies and navigate challenges. * Electoral Backlash: In the long term, a pattern of dishonesty can lead to significant electoral losses for the Prime Minister's party. Voters are likely to punish a leader and party they perceive as untrustworthy. * Resignation or Removal: In severe cases, especially if the lie is significant or there's a sustained pattern of deception, public pressure, internal party dissent, or formal processes like a vote of no confidence can force the Prime Minister to resign or be removed from office. Governmental and Institutional Consequences: * Destabilization of Government: Public distrust in the leader can translate to distrust in the entire government, making it harder to govern effectively and potentially leading to instability. * Difficulty in Passing Legislation: A Prime Minister who lacks public trust may struggle to gain support for their legislative agenda. * Damage to International Relations: Lying on the international stage can damage a country's credibility and relationships with other nations. * Erosion of Faith in Democratic Institutions: When leaders lie, it can undermine the public's faith in the integrity of democratic processes and institutions. Legal Consequences: * While there isn't always a direct legal penalty for lying to the public in a general sense, there can be legal ramifications in specific circumstances: * Perjury or Misleading Parliament: Knowingly providing false information under oath or to a parliamentary committee can be a criminal offense in many jurisdictions. * Fraud or Misappropriation: If the lie is connected to financial fraud or the misuse of public funds, legal charges can be laid. * Election Offences: Some jurisdictions have laws against making false statements during election campaigns. * Defamation: If the lie harms the reputation of an individual or entity, legal action for defamation may be possible. Ethical and Moral Consequences: * Breach of Public Trust: A Prime Minister has a fundamental ethical duty to be honest and transparent with the people they serve. Lying is a profound breach of this trust. * Setting a Negative Example: Dishonesty at the highest level of government can set a negative example for the rest of society. * Undermining Democratic Values: Truthfulness is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy. Lying undermines the principles of accountability and informed public discourse. Examples: History is replete with examples of Prime Ministers and other political leaders facing consequences for lying or misleading the public. These range from resignations due to misleading parliament (like the Profumo affair in the UK) to long-term damage to reputation and electoral defeat. More recently, accusations of misleading the public have surrounded leaders in various countries regarding issues from policy promises to personal conduct. In conclusion, while the immediate consequences of a Prime Minister lying might vary depending on the nature and context of the lie, the long-term effects almost always involve a significant erosion of public trust and damage to the integrity of the political process.

Malcolm Roberts Truth Seeker Song dai.ly/x9hl8v2

Senator Roberts says his “track record speaks for itself” — so let’s actually look at it. ❌ What he voted against: • Energy price relief during inflation spikes • Subsidised childcare for working families • Renewable energy investment (despite global cost advantages) • Anti-corruption legislation (missed key votes on NACC) ✅ What he voted for: • Privatising government services • Keeping political donations less transparent • Corporate tax cuts over social supports • Limiting Indigenous recognition and Voice proposals • Pro-fossil fuel motions, even when they risked higher energy costs long-term All while claiming to “hold the government accountable.” So my question is: Where exactly do you get your definition of a good track record from? The back of a One Nation bumper sticker? Here’s the actual voting record, for anyone who prefers facts over slogans: theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/queensland/malcolm_roberts

Good luck and best wishes I hope One Nation gets landslide results