Horse and buggy Malcolm. Why stop at coal and oil, we must go back to genuine self-sufficiency and return to horses and buggies. Good ol’ days.

If government hadn't adopted the net zero farce, our refineries wouldn't of closed and went offshore. If Australia who produces the gas didn't extort Australians with high prices, our fertiliser manufacturing wouldn't of closed and become an import product. It seems net zero was the biggest disgrace to our country since the Lima agreement.

Steam engines...so modern.

Now not 2050

Mr.17 votes with his tinfoil hat speaks and thinks he's relevant 😂😂😂

Did he just waste time and not really answer the question 🤔😐✌️

Moon face says ????

with all our oceans , native forests and grassland we already sequester more carbon than we produce so we are already carbon negative..

What if we dropped the scary term net zero and just called it producing environmentally sustainable, more efficient energy production that has been proven to reduce the cost to the consumer?

Adopt, is a far far cry, from implementation and\or legislation.

Well said Malcolm 👍

Malcolm take a look at the last 12 months NEM pricing data & see if you can figure out why power companies are building renewables & not more coal & gas. Also have a crack & see if you can figure out who paid to build almost every coal fired power station

How much will it cost Australia to scrap Net Zero Mr Roberts.

One Nation a part of a world wide project burnt billionaires

Great stuff!!!

How convenient that the TIME EXPIRED!!!!!!!! At the most critical point

All reactive bullshit. Should have been producing fuels over the last years years and only Australia oil stays on our soil

You guys, One Nation are telling the truth, ❤️❤️❤️

Well this post is going as well as all your cooker posts. Senator

Why would anyone in their right mind want to pull away from net zero? Please explain?

Mumbo jumbo bullshit reply

In a country with a division of powers between the federal and State parliaments, and short electoral terms, will overseas companies be willing to invest in very expensive long-term projects? Funding a rapid transition to fossil fuels through the government alone would add to the national debt and could drive the exchange rate down, increasing inflation and interest rate rises. The world is moving towards a low-carbon future, though not all nations at the same rate. We are not big enough to stand alone. A strategy that does not have us reducing our reliance on fossil fuels can only occur with more taxes and higher prices for refinery products and electricity. We can slow it down, but the crunch will come in 2070 when we will lose most of our allies and trading partners by refusing a net-zero goal. Not the UN; they will let us do what we want. It will be driven by national governments.

🤣🤣🤣

The latest artificial intelligence (AI) tools from Anthropic and OpenAI went to new extremes in trying to undermine a popular platform during testing by the UK's AI Security Institute. The AISI said on Tuesday that Anthropic's Mythos and OpenAI's Sol models engaged in a level of "autonomy and deception" it had not seen before. During routine AI safety testing, an Anthropic agent created fake profiles of real people as it tried to trick a person standing between it and access to GitHub, a large platform where technology developers store software code.

👉💉💉💉

She will be the next prime minister

Sounds like a great plan. Reduce cost of government and everything else should follow.

So, we don't have mass immigration and our immigration has already reduced significantly since the aftermath of covid. Considering immigrants, particularly students and skilled workers, contribute significantly to our taxes each year, how do you plan to make up the difference? Students alone give us over 50 billion in taxes annually. It's funny how they never elaborate of what this "wasteful spending" is or what they are going to stop "overspending" on. It's quite telling they they never elaborate. For all we know, wasteful spending and over spending is in reference to things like healthcare and education. It would be helpful to clearly elaborate on exactly what services you consider wasteful spending and over spending, otherwise people may vote for you thinking you just mean things like immigration, but then you turn around and cut things that they rely on or that are important to them. Is your idea of wasteful spending and overspending the same as others? How could we know? You never elaborate. It's coming across as intentially misleading. Great, that means you've saved tax payers less than 5 billion dollars annually by scrapping those things. You can put it towards funding your polices, like increasing defence spending to 3.5% of our annual GDP, which is only about 80-100 billion annually. It's going to be interesting to hear how you plan yo fund that, as well as the Oil and Gas policy in which we get to help finance mining companies in their early exploration endeavours, most of which amount to nothing except destroying the environment and wasting money. Which is no doubt part of the reason as to why you want to cut all the red tape, because who cares about the state of our country. You should be able to let your mining buddies tear it up. Drill baby, drill. Though, how is that going to work from a health and safety perspective? Are you ready to be held accountable for if your cuts result in people getting sick due to pollution? Probably not. I'm sure there would be plenty of excuses. Perhaps the covid vaccine coincidentally finally kicking in? I also notice that nothing has been mentioned in regards to healthcare, education, energy, housing, pensioners, etc. You claimed that you're going to restore living standards, improve cost of living and improve the economy, yet you haven't listed how and your dot points don't reflect this.

Now if you want an economic recipe for disaster this is it.

Love how she actualy answers the question. Not like 99% other polititions❤️❤️

Would love to see the detail and depth of those policies. Also the costings.

Smart woman with great ideas 👌👏🧡🇦🇺🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡

Pauline speaking common sense

One nation where policies are slogans and math doesn't matter

Ungh... everything a cooker needs to hear.

That wonderful but our environment is not something Australians want destroyed or not a top priority we live in a bueatiful country and our future generations need a government that has the capacity to safeguard it

At least she’s making the right noises.

Oh, you mean like Trump did in America? How is that working out?

Well, we have a shell of a plan……. Crickets

The Paris Agreement has 195 countries plus the European Union as parties, making it one of the most widely supported international agreements for a reason! but sure remove the climate change department and Australia in that and let’s just ignore what’s going on 🤯

We must vote one nation

This says it all - “to get a mine up…”

But oppose all pay rises for the 'battlers' they claim to reperesent?...

Bring on one nation let’s try to get this country back on track

Ah, so many people wanting a reduced standard of living. You just might get what you wish for.

Australia's Trump

And where did she study her finance degree, environment degree she did not finish school 🧐🤔

I’d agree with all of what she say, if it was feasible and possible, it’s like me saying I’ll look into becoming a billionaire I could do it………..yes I’ll definitely look at becoming one of those, you’ve just got to work hard and make good investment choices…….. I’ve worked hard for 40+ years all I’ve got are aches and pains.

You say cut back give us a number

It’s all word salad with no dressing