Mini Mal has a new speech writer ✍️ Like 🤔 He just found out about AI 🤖🤪

Political Parties need to state positively if they will leave the Paris Agreement and WHEN, to be believed.

I have never believed in climate change unless they were talking the four seasons spring , summer, autumn, winter are the only one's i know of

Bagging out the coalition is not doing any favours. I’m a strong believer in One Nation. Please unite to get rid of the lying corrupt Labor party

Will not do you any good bagging The Coalition

100% agree

Your on a house of cards wee man

Yes

Drop the Paris agreement

Fully cooked as usual

Absolutely

Aussies Eye On Australia

The UN's own climate people have just said that this whole climate emergency is unbelievable and far from realistic.

Get us out of the rest of them while you're at it. Do not consent to any of these sick plans they have for the world

So I’ve read your article Malcolm. And honestly, this is where the argument completely falls apart. You keep presenting the Paris Agreement as though it is some kind of external force “controlling” Australia, when in reality Australia voluntarily chooses its own policies, targets and legislation. Paris does not force Australia to build transmission lines. Paris does not force Australia to subsidise EVs. Paris does not force Australia to create hydrogen projects. Those were decisions made by Australian governments. You are blending together international cooperation, domestic politics, energy policy, inflation, housing stress, aid spending and global economics into one giant villain called “Paris” and hoping people don’t notice the difference. You also repeatedly imply Net Zero was somehow “hidden” in the agreement through sneaky wording. No Malcolm. Countries openly understood the emissions balancing goal back in 2015. The terminology evolved later, but pretending this was some secret conspiracy is misleading. And the economic argument is incredibly one-sided. You talk endlessly about the cost of transition while barely acknowledging the cost of doing nothing in a world where global markets, investors, insurers and trading partners are already moving toward decarbonisation anyway. You mention Europe? Then mention carbon border tariffs too. You mention China polluting? Then mention China dominating renewable manufacturing and EV supply chains at the same time. You mention sovereignty? Then explain how Australia remains economically competitive if major export markets increasingly demand lower emissions production. Because “just leave Paris” is not an economic plan. It’s a slogan. And frankly, some of the rhetoric in your article is completely over the top. “Climate cult alcoholics.” “Radical socialist plan.” “Scam.” “Destruction of equal citizenship.” That is not serious economic analysis. That is culture war language designed to create fear and outrage. The biggest irony of all is that your article accidentally proves the opposite of what you intended. You admit yourself that most of the actual policies people are angry about were created domestically by Australian governments. Which means the real debate Australians should be having is not: “Paris bad.” It’s: “What specific energy policies actually work best for Australia?” Because blaming a single international agreement for literally everything wrong in the economy might be emotionally satisfying politically. But it is not honest.

Ten million Aussies with solar panels on their roof.....we are well on the way to Net Zero.

They’d never have the balls to do this Only one nation will

Why won’t they? Why has Matt changed his position on it? Who is getting in their ear? Something strange going on.

Did anyone vote for this?

World Health Organisation is next to go.

It is not