I’ve never seen a solar panel or a wind turbine renew itself yet 😆

All the cookers are out and about… 😂😂😂😂

What is PHON going to do about all the alien abductions?

Hold my Beer - Snowy 2

If a wind turbine isn’t turning its called curtailment

thanks to excess renewable generation, i can now fully charge my battery for free, and no more electricity costs.

Bowen has collected his brown paper bag ?

Yes please end this absurdity!!!

I’ve been living on solar for over five years now. It works brilliantly.

Ask any virtue signalling battery vehicle driver where he charges his toy car and you will be told (in most cases) at home or at a charging station or at work. Then ask him where that electrical power is generated and you will get a blank look. Ask him then how he defines ”green energy”.

2. 303. Bullies. Will. Fix. Wind. Terrine

www.facebook.com/share/r/1Kbz6JsoJ1/

Then what was your solution to cheaper power considering end-of-life coal generators? Nothing produces power as cheaply as renewables that have free fuel to run them.

To quote Barnaby…..Sit down Malcom. Let the grown ups run the show.

#FaceTheClimateCrisis

Blackout bowen there coming for your seat 🤣

Keep speaking truth Malcolm

Electroverse

No no no. The modelling said it’s all fine! Relax!

We need to follow New Zealand as they are seriously talking about pulling out of Paris agreement

I guess you lost biggly in this round Hobbit. Your hero Trumps Hormuz Butt Plug problem has promoted the biggest push globally for renewables yet. France and Germany have declared full electrification of their energy mix. Coal and gas are 100% over. 🐐

Senator Malcolm Roberts you, and many of us with no real public profile, are obviously in very good company as “conspiracy theorists”. Wear it as a badge of honour. Keep up your good work Sir.

I would be more interested in a peer reviewed study into how you breathe without a functioning brain

Good thing I did my own research and trusted my discernment rather than their $cience

💯 stay strong Malcolm. Side note, if the pharmaceutical companies were providing value, the educational institutions would be paying them for their services....not the other way around

Most of these quotes aren't recent. They're from way before 2020.

Are these quotes dated anywhere?

Hope this helps.... Context: These editors were criticizing systemic problems — industry funding bias, poor study design, publication bias, conflicts of interest — in the broader medical research ecosystem, not confessing that their own specific journals as institutions were "corrupt" in a narrower sense (e.g., fraud by the journal itself). The meme's framing ("testified to the corruption of NEJM," etc.) conflates "criticized systemic corruption affecting published research broadly" with "confessed my journal specifically was corrupt." These are also genuinely two decades-plus old in some cases (Relman/Angell date to the 1980s–2000s), used to imply an ongoing, current indictment rather than commentary tied to a specific era and specific practices (much of which prompted reforms like clinical trial registries, COI disclosure rules, etc. that followed). So: real quotes, real people, but "testified" is inaccurate framing, and the implication that top editors declared their own journals fundamentally corrupt (rather than criticizing broader systemic bias in published research) oversimplifies what they actually said.

The best way to stay healthy is to avoid the medical profession.

20 plus year old quotes, LOL.

Coz memes r da noesis, aren't they, malcolm?

I ree.bet as a.kid In the late 1950s a classmate came down with Polio. We kids all lined up for the Salk vaccine and the Sabin vaccine the following year. I have trusted vaccines ever since. It is bloody selfish to feel self-righteous and risk passing diseases to others.There is always some risk but very small compared to societal benefit.

Hey Malcolm can you point out any peer reviewed studies with regards to chemtrails ?

You don't need a PhD to have figured that out. Logic and common sense told many of us that a long time ago.

How about an inner ear blockage

No way Mal relying on meme sent in without looking into its context? 🥴 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Pop your tin hat back on champ

The lancet is talking about small unreliable studies. They are the ones Malcolm Robert’s believes in.

Cooker in politics. Who would have thought

Thankyou for your support in this matter

A perfect example of Richard Horton’s quote would be Andrew Wakefield’s MMR autism study that was published in the Lancet for 12 years before being retracted. It had an extremely low sample size, invalid analysis and a flagrant conflict of interest, and inspired a decades long dubiously fashionable trend of trying to link vaccines to autism.

Not surprised, but still very disturbing.

When your news source is Fox and the White House and you don’t have Google on your phone, distorting the facts becomes life. Marcia Angell was a physician and served as editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) for many years. In a 2009 article in the New York Review of Books, she wrote: “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published…” She went on to say that she had reached this conclusion reluctantly during her two decades at the NEJM. But there is an important qualification Angell was not saying that published medical research as a whole was worthless, fraudulent, or that scientific journals couldn’t be trusted at all. She was specifically criticising the influence of pharmaceutical companies on clinical research, including financial conflicts of interest and the way industry-funded studies could be designed or reported in ways favourable to particular drugs. In the same article, she discussed problems such as drug companies sponsoring research and the tendency for doctors to be presented with evidence favouring newer, expensive medicines. This distinction matters because the quote has subsequently been used to support claims that medical journals themselves are essentially propaganda. For example, in 2025 Robert F. Kennedy Jr. cited Angell when attacking major medical journals. However, former NEJM editors subsequently pointed out that Angell did not say that the NEJM was “a vessel for pharmaceutical propaganda” — that wording was attributed to her but is not what she actually wrote.

I love how Malcom Roberts doesn’t check any of this

Conspiracy,AI, Malcolm Roberts. Senator in the Australian Parliament ??????

Scientists constantly check the work of other scientists and anything that is not reproducible or that is incorrectly interpreted in the literature is corrected. Individual scientists may commit fraud, but they get caught by other scientists and have the book thrown at them! They are liable to be terminated, sued by their funding agency or institution or imprisoned if caught.