Senator Malcolm Roberts you, and many of us with no real public profile, are obviously in very good company as “conspiracy theorists”. Wear it as a badge of honour. Keep up your good work Sir.

You don't need a PhD to have figured that out. Logic and common sense told many of us that a long time ago.

Good thing I did my own research and trusted my discernment rather than their $cience

Most of these quotes aren't recent. They're from way before 2020.

Hope this helps.... Context: These editors were criticizing systemic problems — industry funding bias, poor study design, publication bias, conflicts of interest — in the broader medical research ecosystem, not confessing that their own specific journals as institutions were "corrupt" in a narrower sense (e.g., fraud by the journal itself). The meme's framing ("testified to the corruption of NEJM," etc.) conflates "criticized systemic corruption affecting published research broadly" with "confessed my journal specifically was corrupt." These are also genuinely two decades-plus old in some cases (Relman/Angell date to the 1980s–2000s), used to imply an ongoing, current indictment rather than commentary tied to a specific era and specific practices (much of which prompted reforms like clinical trial registries, COI disclosure rules, etc. that followed). So: real quotes, real people, but "testified" is inaccurate framing, and the implication that top editors declared their own journals fundamentally corrupt (rather than criticizing broader systemic bias in published research) oversimplifies what they actually said.

No way Mal relying on meme sent in without looking into its context? 🥴 😂😂😂😂😂😂

The best way to stay healthy is to avoid the medical profession.

Hey Malcolm can you point out any peer reviewed studies with regards to chemtrails ?

Not surprised, but still very disturbing.

And give the money back they made and compensation to those they harmed. There should be an investigation of their conflicts because if not conflicted their competence should be assessed.

What if🎃I told you🎃you can take the "s.c.r.e.w🔩b.a.l.l"🎱out of #ABolt🎃but🎃you can't🎃"tell 'im 'e's dreaming"🎃coz🎃lT's "w.o.k.e"🎈

Bill Gates purchased the Cochrane database in 2019. Someone put his thumb on the scale.

Of course they will be and they will try and silence them aswell

How did Kelly and Skerritt fail to see the obvious?

easy answer YES

Holy selective quoting Batman 🤣

Like the peer reviewed studies saying COVID vaccinations caused thousands of deaths, can't find that one

What are they talking about? What context? Whose accusing them of being ‘conspiracy theorists’ grandad?

Vote Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party

The government and Big Pharma lied and people died

This is a misleading post ... again. The quotations shown are largely genuine, but they're being taken out of context. Editors from journals such as The Lancet, The BMJ, and The New England Journal of Medicine have indeed criticised problems in medical research—including publication bias, conflicts of interest, poor study design, selective reporting, and the influence of pharmaceutical funding. These concerns have been openly discussed in the scientific community for decades. What they didn't say is that all peer review is fraudulent or that medical journals "cannot be trusted." In fact, these editors were calling for better science, stronger peer review, greater transparency, and research reform—not the rejection of scientific evidence. Science is a self-correcting process. The fact that leading editors publicly acknowledge flaws is evidence that the system is willing to critique and improve itself, not evidence that the entire scientific literature is worthless. Ironically, these quotes are often used to argue against the very scientific process that produced them.